Khan Noonien Singh vs. Yoda · Movie Versus Forum

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Just repost my 2 posts at the bottoms of page 165. He has no argument against them. Like Ellimist just ignores the words, and repeats his same points that have been refuted, i.e. he just keeps Trolling.
Just let this thread die now. He's been owned by multiple posters already, so why keep going around in circles? He's lost and he knows it.
If he wants to carry on, he's welcome to accept my Khan vs Ahsoka battlezone challenge. He has to try and win that first. He's proven himself unworthy of holding his own in a Khan vs Elite Jedi/Sith debate.

You already backed down from two battlezones. One you accepted and the day of booked out on Vader. Sad, really. The second you've trolled about for months but when push comes to shove your pussy starts bleeding and you make excuses. If I lose I won't post in the Star Wars forum for three months.

Accept the challenge you pansy.

Darth Thor Senior Member

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Like Ellimist just ignores the words, and repeats his same points that have been refuted, i.e. he just keeps Trolling.

I meant "Like Ellimist SAID"

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Just repost my 2 posts at the bottoms of page 165. He has no argument against them.
Just let this thread die now.

So two lies. I refuted his arguments to which he hasn't even addressed because he's done. Secondly he says let the thread die but he continues to post showcasing him as an emotional fool who can't follow through with his own advice.

KuRuPT Thanosi Senior Member

Originally posted by quanchi112
I was casually blocking the attacks ??? English please. Pai Mei dominated and had her at his mercy. Dooku escaped while Yoda was too busy aiding his allies. Yoda knew how inprtant killing Dooku was yet he failed. You're very bad at this. You compared Yoda failing to Pai Mei casually dominating a hopeful student.
He was ko'd and down for over thirty seconds. He didn't want to be struck by it and moved his and to block it. He failed. So you admit he was trying to deal with the attack so you admit he failed. You are hideously stupid.
You conceded the point above.
Palps resisted being ko'd. He wasn't defeated or ko'd like the guards. He ranked the force push. Khan is a lot more resilient than Palpatine so if a force push can't take out someone older, and less durable what chance does it have if defeating Khan ?
Khan won't be standing right next to a wall and they are featless guards without superhuman cellular regeneration. The facts always laugh at you just like the women you've encountered.
😂

No you bumbling moron, YOU said Yoda was AT DOOKU'S MERCY. Only a moron would view that scene that way. Yoda was CASUALLY dealing with Dooku's attacks and even telling him he has a lot to learn. How on earth is that helpless. He was casually dealing with him. Again, it's like watching one guy block everything another guy throws at him, tell him he sucks and has a lot to learn... THEN have a guy from the audience yell out... See, you were helpless against his attacks!! Everybody then looks at that guy who said that, points and laughs at him for being a total moron. That guy is you

Again, you didn't watch the movie then did you? Nor do you understand the dynamic going on there. Yoda "wasn't trying to kill him" He was there to CAPTURE him. At no point was he trying to kill his former padawan. This was made explicitly clear in the script and novel. So again, you are ignorant to the source material.

Who said he wanted to be KO'd you bumbling moron? Nobody. He didn't. What I said was, he wasn't quite braced for the power Sids had. He figured he could casually deal with it like he did Dooku... He was wrong. However, that doesnt' change the fact that you said he was unable to dodge the attack... when HE DIDN'T TRY AND DODGE IT. Remember those people laughing at that guy above, he's you.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
No you bumbling moron, YOU said Yoda was AT DOOKU'S MERCY. Only a moron would view that scene that way. Yoda was CASUALLY dealing with Dooku's attacks and even telling him he has a lot to learn. How on earth is that helpless. He was casually dealing with him. Again, it's like watching one guy block everything another guy throws at him, tell him he sucks and has a lot to learn... THEN have a guy from the audience yell out... See, you were helpless against his attacks!! Everybody then looks at that guy who said that, points and laughs at him for being a total moron. That guy is you
Again, you didn't watch the movie then did you? Nor do you understand the dynamic going on there. Yoda "wasn't trying to kill him" He was there to CAPTURE him. At no point was he trying to kill his former padawan. This was made explicitly clear in the script and novel. So again, you are ignorant to the source material.
Who said he wanted to be KO'd you bumbling moron? Nobody. He didn't. What I said was, he wasn't quite braced for the power Sids had. He figured he could casually deal with it like he did Dooku... He was wrong. However, that doesnt' change the fact that you said he was unable to dodge the attack... when HE DIDN'T TRY AND DODGE IT. Remember those people laughing at that guy above, he's you.

He was at his mercy aka he was busying trying to repel his attacks. Yoda let a weaker Sith dictate the fight despite being more powerful and skilled. He had to react the entire fight to how Dooku was attacking him. Your points and sentence structure is cringe worthy.

Either way Yoda failed. He didn't capture him. I guess when he swings a saber at someone he really didn't want to hurt him ?

😂 😂

He wasn't quick enough to repel or deflect it. That's the point. The second time he absorbed it since he was quick enough to put his hand in a position to do so. The first time he was hit before that occurred.

You're a massive dumbass. Your posts are incoherent madness.

😂

KuRuPT Thanosi Senior Member

You've conceded and been crushed. That moron people laugh at... that's you.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
You've conceded and been crushed. That moron people laugh at... that's you.

Those moron people are wrong. I agree. You're one of them. I've refuted every single point and your entire posting consists of your feelings and pleas to be respected. I say thee nay.

Khan ftw

KuRuPT Thanosi Senior Member

Incorrect, you've conceded the thread already. Yoda wins

KuRuPT Thanosi Senior Member

Originally posted by quanchi112
He was at his mercy aka he was busying trying to repel his attacks. Yoda let a weaker Sith dictate the fight despite being more powerful and skilled. He had to react the entire fight to how Dooku was attacking him. Your points and sentence structure is cringe worthy.
Either way Yoda failed. He didn't capture him. I guess when he swings a saber at someone he really didn't want to hurt him ?
😂 😂
He wasn't quick enough to repel or deflect it. That's the point. The second time he absorbed it since he was quick enough to put his hand in a position to do so. The first time he was hit before that occurred.
You're a massive dumbass. Your posts are incoherent madness.
😂

You're too stupid to even make a coherent argument, let alone analyze scenes from movies. Dooku did not have Yoda at his Mercy like you claimed. That was blatantly idiotic, but that doesn't surprise me coming from you. Look no further than real life sports... GO look at the Whitaker vs. Ramirez 2 fight. Ramirez was "dictating" the fight.. He was constantly pressing forward, constantly being aggressive and throwing a lot of punches that Whitaker had to avoid or block. Yet Whitaker won ever single round of that fight. Same thing here, Yoda was CASUALLY dealing with Dooku, he even comments he has much to learn as he was casually dealing with him. In no way shape or form did Dooku have Yoda at his mercy as you claimed.

Again, you're ignorant of the source material. You said Yoda was there to kill Dooku, he wasn't. Shoot, you didn't even know Palps and the Emperor were the same person. Stop debating subjects you have no clue about.

Also, the only reason Dooku escaped is because Yoda had to protect Anakin and Kenobi from being killed. Dooku via the script and novel was tiring when facing Yoda. He knew he couldn't beat him. That is hardly what I used to say somebody had another at their mercy clownshoes.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Incorrect, you've conceded the thread already. Yoda wins

Repeating something that isn't true only makes you an idiot, Kt. 😂

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
You're too stupid to even make a coherent argument, let alone analyze scenes from movies. Dooku did not have Yoda at his Mercy like you claimed. That was blatantly idiotic, but that doesn't surprise me coming from you. Look no further than real life sports... GO look at the Whitaker vs. Ramirez 2 fight. Ramirez was "dictating" the fight.. He was constantly pressing forward, constantly being aggressive and throwing a lot of punches that Whitaker had to avoid or block. Yet Whitaker won ever single round of that fight. Same thing here, Yoda was CASUALLY dealing with Dooku, he even comments he has much to learn as he was casually dealing with him. In no way shape or form did Dooku have Yoda at his mercy as you claimed.
Again, you're ignorant of the source material. You said Yoda was there to kill Dooku, he wasn't. Shoot, you didn't even know Palps and the Emperor were the same person. Stop debating subjects you have no clue about.
Also, the only reason Dooku escaped is because Yoda had to protect Anakin and Kenobi from being killed. Dooku via the script and novel was tiring when facing Yoda. He knew he couldn't beat him. That is hardly what I used to say somebody had another at their mercy clownshoes.

Another post attempting to ape my insults towards you further demonstrating the severe retardation you exhibit on a daily level.

You didn't understand my point just as you don't understand anything you watch, read, or have your mommy try to teach you. Dooku dictated the fight since Yoda was on the defensive. Yoda was always defending himself to Dooku's attacks prior to their Lightsaber duel and at the end of it. Just as the boxer dictated the tempo of the fight correlates with my point. At no point did I say Dooku was winning just that he was dictating the tempo of their engagement for the majority of the time. Your basic comprehension issues follow you around this entire forum further exposing you as a simpleton and moron savant.

Another clueless insult. Yes, Yoda was there to kill him. If someone swings a Lightsaber at your head the intent is generally to kill especially given the severity of the galactic crisis the Jedi were facing if Dooku survived.

I never said Yoda would be defeated but as you moronically even point out Yoda was on the defensive hence my original point.

Game, set, match.

🙂

KuRuPT Thanosi Senior Member

No you didn't, you didn't say Dictated the fight... Your INTITAL clam was that Dooku "Had Yoda at his mercy' .. Then after I chumped you, and easily per the norm, you change it to... he was dictating the fight. How can you claim you won and argument where you just moved the goalposts mid argument. That's called a lose. Dooku didn't have Yoda at his mercy as you falsely claimed.

Yes your buffoon, he was there to CAPTURE him. This is EXPLICTLY stated in the scrip and novel. He wasn't there to kill him buffoon. Look no further than Mace confronting Dooku... He could've came up behind him and killed him. Instead he tried to reason with him and hold somebody hostage. Clearly demonstrating, he wasn't there to "kill him" . Again you're ignorant of the source material. You can injure somebody with your saber and incapacitate them for capture. Look no further than what Dooku did to Kenobi, he injured him with his saber, put him down, but it didn't kill him. We see this again with Anakin and Dooku after Anakin cut his arms off. He was still alive and Anakin dropped his swords and said he was stand trial, it goes again the Jedi to kill him. Only after the Emperor goaded him, did he kill him. However, again it shows, in a duel you can hurt somebody enough to capture them without killing them. Again ignorant about the source material.

You've lost another argument to me, per the norm.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
No you didn't, you didn't say Dictated the fight... Your INTITAL clam was that Dooku "Had Yoda at his mercy' .. Then after I chumped you, and easily per the norm, you change it to... he was dictating the fight. How can you claim you won and argument where you just moved the goalposts mid argument. That's called a lose. Dooku didn't have Yoda at his mercy as you falsely claimed.
Yes your buffoon, he was there to CAPTURE him. This is EXPLICTLY stated in the scrip and novel. He wasn't there to kill him buffoon. Look no further than Mace confronting Dooku... He could've came up behind him and killed him. Instead he tried to reason with him and hold somebody hostage. Clearly demonstrating, he wasn't there to "kill him" . Again you're ignorant of the source material. You can injure somebody with your saber and incapacitate them for capture. Look no further than what Dooku did to Kenobi, he injured him with his saber, put him down, but it didn't kill him. We see this again with Anakin and Dooku after Anakin cut his arms off. He was still alive and Anakin dropped his swords and said he was stand trial, it goes again the Jedi to kill him. Only after the Emperor goaded him, did he kill him. However, again it shows, in a duel you can hurt somebody enough to capture them without killing them. Again ignorant about the source material.
You've lost another argument to me, per the norm.

Yes, he dictated the fight and had Yoda at his mercy. Nothing has changed. Reality is still the same but your perception of reality changes from post to post due to your inability to understand pretty much anything above a fifth grade reading level.

It's also called a "loss" not a lose you ignorant baboon. Your ineptitude is rather appalling. Why would someone as dense as you choose a masochistic existence through debating.

What does Mace have to do with Yoda ? Dooku had overwhelming numbers and his own defenses/senses so he wouldn't be just a one swipe kill. You can't prove your claims. You just keep making more asinine claims to back up your previous asinine claims. When someone engages in a light saber duel in this fashion they meant to kill. Your stupidity isn't a valid rebuttal. I didn't say you can't but with what was on the line and given Yoda's actions it's logical to assume he would kill Dooku to spare a galactic conflict you dumb baboon.

Kenobi attempted to kill Maul in a Phantom Menace. Windu attempted to kill Sidious in Rots. There I just provided two examples of Jedi trying to kill Sith Lords. Your welcome.

You're a dimwit trapped in his own retarded make believe world. Kill yourself.

Darth Thor Senior Member

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
However, again it shows, in a duel you can hurt somebody enough to capture them without killing them. Again ignorant about the source material.

He's always been ignorant about the source material.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi

You've lost another argument to me, per the norm.

So nothing new happening here 👆

Also I wonder who the 8 people are who voted for Khan. We know who the 2 are who voted he stomps. But who are the other 8? And why they hiding like cowards instead of backing up their ridiculous vote. I suspect Quanchi has made multiple sock accounts.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Darth Thor
He's always been ignorant about the source material.
So nothing new happening here 👆
Also I wonder who the 8 people are who voted for Khan. We know who the 2 are who voted he stomps. But who are the other 8? And why they hiding like cowards instead of backing up their ridiculous vote. I suspect Quanchi has made multiple sock accounts.

This is all you've been reduced to by myself. You're a laughing stock on the Star Wars forum and won't even directly challenge me. You also ran from the Kelvin Ot challenge. Pussy.

KuRuPT Thanosi Senior Member

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, he dictated the fight and had Yoda at his mercy. Nothing has changed. Reality is still the same but your perception of reality changes from post to post due to your inability to understand pretty much anything above a fifth grade reading level.
It's also called a "loss" not a lose you ignorant baboon. Your ineptitude is rather appalling. Why would someone as dense as you choose a masochistic existence through debating.
What does Mace have to do with Yoda ? Dooku had overwhelming numbers and his own defenses/senses so he wouldn't be just a one swipe kill. You can't prove your claims. You just keep making more asinine claims to back up your previous asinine claims. When someone engages in a light saber duel in this fashion they meant to kill. Your stupidity isn't a valid rebuttal. I didn't say you can't but with what was on the line and given Yoda's actions it's logical to assume he would kill Dooku to spare a galactic conflict you dumb baboon.
Kenobi attempted to kill Maul in a Phantom Menace. Windu attempted to kill Sidious in Rots. There I just provided two examples of Jedi trying to kill Sith Lords. Your welcome.
You're a dimwit trapped in his own retarded make believe world. Kill yourself.

Against ignorant of the source material. Maul was the apprentice, sids was in charge. He wasn't Lord Maul you buffoon. It pains me to have to correct you all the time.

You citing examples of people killing others with a sword isn't proof your moron. Nobody says people don't go for the kill for sabers. YOUR CLAIM WAS, that Yoda was there to kill Dooku... and he wasn't. To back up your claim you cite times when people were killed by sabers? Do you know how idiotic that looks. When the source material says Yoda was there to CAPTURE him.. it has ZERO relevance if Kenobi killed Maul... or Sids killing Fisto... It was explicitly stated he was there to capture him clownshoes. Get better at this.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Against ignorant of the source material. Maul was the apprentice, sids was in charge. He wasn't Lord Maul you buffoon. It pains me to have to correct you all the time.
You citing examples of people killing others with a sword isn't proof your moron. Nobody says people don't go for the kill for sabers. YOUR CLAIM WAS, that Yoda was there to kill Dooku... and he wasn't. To back up your claim you cite times when people were killed by sabers? Do you know how idiotic that looks. When the source material says Yoda was there to CAPTURE him.. it has ZERO relevance if Kenobi killed Maul... or Sids killing Fisto... It was explicitly stated he was there to capture him clownshoes. Get better at this.

What the hell is your first paragraph supposed to address ? Can't you even break down the quotes. I bet you don't know how. 😂

Based off Yoda's actions he would have died. Occam's razor. You don't bring a shotgun shoot at a guy and miss and claim hey I was just trying to wound him.

Prove he was only there to capture him. 😂

KuRuPT Thanosi Senior Member

You're too stupid to realize the dumb comments you make and I have to correct. YOU SAID "I've provided two examples of Jedi's trying to kill SITH LORDS" Maul wasn't a Sith Lord. Ignorant to the source material rears its ugly head again.

Robtard Senor Member

LoL, quanchi saw me say "Occam's Razor" yesterday and now he's parroting without knowing what the hell it means.

"Khan wins. Occam's Razor!". *everyone laughs at him*

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
You're too stupid to realize the dumb comments you make and I have to correct. YOU SAID "I've provided two examples of Jedi's trying to kill SITH LORDS" Maul wasn't a Sith Lord. Ignorant to the source material rears its ugly head again.

Darth Maul is a fictional character in the science fiction franchise Star Wars. Trained as Darth Sidious's first apprentice, he serves as a Sith Lord and a master of wielding....

Google it.

Sidious referred to Dooku as a Sith Lord and he was an apprentice as well. I never said he was the master but he was the Sith Lord. Foiled again as I unlike you grasp the source material.