Originally posted by RobtardWhen did I say it's a higher form of canon than the films ?
According to quanchi this picture book is of a higher canon source than the actual films[img]http://www.dmeb2.com/darthmaulsection/bookimages/powerofmyth2_lg.j
Witness here, a man who's 38-39 having a full blown meltdown, behold quanchi112
You seem really upset I'm right. Also pinned my age wrong. I'm also younger than you. By your pic you look your age. Also you looked fat and short.
😂
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
You do realize, that isn't a canon source right? Nor is it what you claimed.
LOL He's just posted that from a thread in the SW forum where they're discussing Legends (Non-Canon) sources.
In this forum however not only is it Canon only, but specifically the movies and Tv series Only.
Originally posted by Robtard
According to quanchi this picture book is of a higher canon source than the actual films
It's hilarious he's gone to such desparate lengths to win this argument. All he has to do was rewatch the films (assuming he has watched them in the first place) and he'd find quotes to support his stance.
As it is though, KT is kicking his ass as per usual.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
LOL He's just posted that from a thread in the SW forum where they're discussing Legends (Non-Canon) sources.In this forum however not only is it Canon only, but specifically the movies and Tv series Only.
So he's not only copying someone else again, he's improperly using that other person's argument. LoLz, clowns be clowny.
Originally posted by Darth ThorAlready posted from the canon wiki Star Wars and the rots.
LOL He's just posted that from a thread in the SW forum where they're discussing Legends (Non-Canon) sources.In this forum however not only is it Canon only, but specifically the movies and Tv series Only.
It's hilarious he's gone to such desparate lengths to win this argument. All he has to do was rewatch the films (assuming he has watched them in the first place) and he'd find quotes to support his stance.
As it is though, KT is kicking his ass as per usual.
I already posted a link in which Robtard and Kt disagreed. Thanks for agreeing I am correct.
Originally posted by RobtardTold you I was correct.
So he's not only copying someone else again, he's improperly using that other person's argument. LoLz, clowns be clowny.
D. Thor coming to fight by my side. QUAN is right. Even my enemies have no choice but to back my claims since they are undeniable facts.
Originally posted by quanchi112
D. Thor already stated my position is right. I already supported it with a direct quote from ROTS.Just because you and Kt don't know that there are multiple Sith Lords that isn't my problem. It is yours.
The moron vs. Quan strikes again. Haven't you figured it out yet? I said EXPLICITLY, cite the movie quote where he calls MAUL a Lord... or refers to him as Lord Maul or Lord of the Sith. You've provided nothing to support your stance. Further, in case you haven't figured it out, YOU are the one, and I can quote you multiple times, that screams out like a petulant child movies only!! This is a movie forum. Yet here, you're citing non canon sources to support your argument. Now do you see why you're still incorrect? You fought against even the TV series, yet here, you want to cite wookiepedia? Lol comical. As per the norm you lose.
Further, even if you were correct in the Jedi killing sith lords as your overall point, you'd still fail regardless. Your premise was... Yoda was there to kill dooku... you tried to support this by saying here are two examples of them doing so. That doesn't prove your case, as I would only have to cite Mace vs. Sids.. to prove the point. Mace went to great lengths to give all he had to beat him. He knew what was at stake and he was dealing with the Lord of the sith. Yet he still tried to capture him at first disproving your theory. You can injure somebody to capture them... as shown again when Anakin disarms dooku and says he will stand trial. This is seen over and over which unquestionably shows, the script and novel are correct... Yoda was there to capture Dooku not kill him as we've seen before
Game set match
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
The moron vs. Quan strikes again. Haven't you figured it out yet? I said EXPLICITLY, cite the movie quote where he calls MAUL a Lord... or refers to him as Lord Maul or Lord of the Sith. You've provided nothing to support your stance. Further, in case you haven't figured it out, YOU are the one, and I can quote you multiple times, that screams out like a petulant child movies only!! This is a movie forum. Yet here, you're citing non canon sources to support your argument. Now do you see why you're still incorrect? You fought against even the TV series, yet here, you want to cite wookiepedia? Lol comical. As per the norm you lose.
Jeez Total Ownage
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiI never said they called him Lord Maul. I said he was a Sith Lord. I provided sources of canon from Star Wars saying he's a Sith Lord. I've also refuted your claim Sidious was the only Sith Lord. You even conceded Vader was an exception aka back pedaling.
The moron vs. Quan strikes again. Haven't you figured it out yet? I said EXPLICITLY, cite the movie quote where he calls MAUL a Lord... or refers to him as Lord Maul or Lord of the Sith. You've provided nothing to support your stance. Further, in case you haven't figured it out, YOU are the one, and I can quote you multiple times, that screams out like a petulant child movies only!! This is a movie forum. Yet here, you're citing non canon sources to support your argument. Now do you see why you're still incorrect? You fought against even the TV series, yet here, you want to cite wookiepedia? Lol comical. As per the norm you lose.Further, even if you were correct in the Jedi killing sith lords as your overall point, you'd still fail regardless. Your premise was... Yoda was there to kill dooku... you tried to support this by saying here are two examples of them doing so. That doesn't prove your case, as I would only have to cite Mace vs. Sids.. to prove the point. Mace went to great lengths to give all he had to beat him. He knew what was at stake and he was dealing with the Lord of the sith. Yet he still tried to capture him at first disproving your theory. You can injure somebody to capture them... as shown again when Anakin disarms dooku and says he will stand trial. This is seen over and over which unquestionably shows, the script and novel are correct... Yoda was there to capture Dooku not kill him as we've seen before
Game set match
Anakin was a Jedi who killed Dooku a Sith Lord right in the beginning of Rots. 😂
It's so easy to prove you wrong. Yoda also went to try to kill Sidious but failed. For ****s sake you're a retard.
And you use the made example in which he states he's too dangerous to be left alive and attempts to kill him ?
😂
Just kill yourself already. Just be gone with from my sight. You're a pitifully stupid man.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I never said they called him Lord Maul. I said he was a Sith Lord. I provided sources of canon from Star Wars saying he's a Sith Lord. I've also refuted your claim Sidious was the only Sith Lord. You even conceded Vader was an exception aka back pedaling.[B] Anakin was a Jedi who killed Dooku a Sith Lord right in the beginning of Rots.
😂It's so easy to prove you wrong. Yoda also went to try to kill Sidious but failed. For ****s sake you're a retard.
And you use the made example in which he states he's too dangerous to be left alive and attempts to kill him ?
😂
Just kill yourself already. Just be gone with from my sight. You're a pitifully stupid man. [/B]
NO SOURCE you just used is a valid source ON THIS FORUM according to you. Shoot, even not on this forum they are very low levels of canon. Here though, they count for nothing per YOUR words. So you've now conceded to me, Maul was never referred to as Lord Maul or Lord of the Sith or any such thing. I've accepted your concession on this matter.
Further showing your stupidity, you try and say Mace tried to kills Sids, which only happened AFTER he FIRST tired to capture him. After he disarms him, he EXPLICITLY states he's going to ARREST him when he shows up. Clearly DISPROVING your theory. Even after they engage in sword conflict, Mace disarms him, and AGAIN states he's under arrest. Proving, without question, Jedi don't always show up trying to kill a Sith Lord, even one THE Lord of the Sith.
Again, the moron strikes again. You said Anakin killed Dooku, but failed to address the actually context there. It's posts like this which make people laugh at you and point. It makes people consider you one of the worst debaters on this site. What you failed to mention was... Anakin DIDN'T try and kill him at first. He disarms him and then explicitly states... he must stand trial. Only AFTER the Emperor's goading did he kill him. Without that, Anakin was going to arrest him, just as said.
Get better at this, you lose, again.
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiI already provided sources. You ignored them. You just spout your opinion without even understanding what I'm saying let alone what you're saying. I have proof you don't.
NO SOURCE you just used is a valid source ON THIS FORUM according to you. Shoot, even not on this forum they are very low levels of canon. Here though, they count for nothing per YOUR words. So you've now conceded to me, Maul was never referred to as Lord Maul or Lord of the Sith or any such thing. I've accepted your concession on this matter.Further showing your stupidity, you try and say Mace tried to kills Sids, which only happened AFTER he FIRST tired to capture him. After he disarms him, he EXPLICITLY states he's going to ARREST him when he shows up. Clearly DISPROVING your theory. Even after they engage in sword conflict, Mace disarms him, and AGAIN states he's under arrest. Proving, without question, Jedi don't always show up trying to kill a Sith Lord, even one THE Lord of the Sith.
Again, the moron strikes again. You said Anakin killed Dooku, but failed to address the actually context there. It's posts like this which make people laugh at you and point. It makes people consider you one of the worst debaters on this site. What you failed to mention was... Anakin DIDN'T try and kill him at first. He disarms him and then explicitly states... he must stand trial. Only AFTER the Emperor's goading did he kill him. Without that, Anakin was going to arrest him, just as said.
Get better at this, you lose, again.
I didn't say Jedi always try to kill Sith Lords I said they can and have attempted. Windu tried to kill him. Proven. Yoda tried to kill Palpatine. Point proven.
Anakin killed him. Windu tried to kill Palpatine. Yoda tried to kill Palpatine. Your nuh uhs are silly. I already have more than enough examples. Your incoherence isn't to be taken seriously. I laugh at cha.
😂
Originally posted by quanchi112
I already provided sources. You ignored them. You just spout your opinion without even understanding what I'm saying let alone what you're saying. I have proof you don't.I didn't say Jedi always try to kill Sith Lords I said they can and have attempted. Windu tried to kill him. Proven. Yoda tried to kill Palpatine. Point proven.
Anakin killed him. Windu tried to kill Palpatine. Yoda tried to kill Palpatine. Your nuh uhs are silly. I already have more than enough examples. Your incoherence isn't to be taken seriously. I laugh at cha.
😂
No clownshoes, that wasn't your premise. You argued that Yoda was there to kill Dooku, IGNORING the script and novel which state he was there to capture him. You cited as "PROOF" he was there to kill Dooku and why you IGNORED evidence, was because Jedi kill Sith Lords... that is what they do. Incorrect, that isn't what they do all the time as you've just admitted. So your reasons for ignoring what we see, was based on faulty logic. We have substantiated proof that Jedi don't go for the kill, therefore there is absolutely zero reason to ignore what we are told, namely, that Yoda was there to capture Dooku.
I accept your concession on the matter.
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiSwining your light saber while def eins your life is trying to kill. I never said they do this 100 percent of the time but given the severity of the circumstances with a galactic conflict in jeopardy are you saying he'd be worried about taking Dooku's life ?
No clownshoes, that wasn't your premise. You argued that Yoda was there to kill Dooku, IGNORING the script and novel which state he was there to capture him. You cited as "PROOF" he was there to kill Dooku and why you IGNORED evidence, was because Jedi kill Sith Lords... that is what they do. Incorrect, that isn't what they do all the time as you've just admitted. So your reasons for ignoring what we see, was based on faulty logic. We have substantiated proof that Jedi don't go for the kill, therefore there is absolutely zero reason to ignore what we are told, namely, that Yoda was there to capture Dooku.I accept your concession on the matter.
Provide proof he was only there to capture Dooku. That's your claim so back it up. You saying something without even backing it up isn't debating.
You can't even defend your own position or support this you concede, virgin.