Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiI have refuted every single point in support of Yoda. You haven't. Game, set, match.
Again, you fail to see how much of a hypocrite you are. YOU claimed people were voting based on bias and without viewing the evidence. Support said claim with facts that people were doing that
So English isn't your language then? YOU CLAIMED that the poll was based on people voting based on their bias and without looking at the evidence. Back up your claim that all the people voting for Yoda did this. I'll await your facts to support your claim, or I'll accept another concession from you.
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiSomeone else made the claim. Onus is on them. I have supplied evidence. It's faulty for anyone to use opinions as more important than evidence. It's all that matters, dumbass.
So English isn't your language then? YOU CLAIMED that the poll was based on people voting based on their bias and without looking at the evidence. Back up your claim that all the people voting for Yoda did this. I'll await your facts to support your claim, or I'll accept another concession from you.
Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
Once more, Quan shows he is completely incapable of being reasonable, logical, or consistent. I've already gone over all these points with him in the first half of this thread, all he does is rinse and repeat the same parroted crap repeatedly. Nobody takes anything he can say seriously...
Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
That's because Quan is a grade A idiot, but you already knew that.
Originally posted by DTM
This statement pretty much proves you have no idea about what Jedi and Sith are capable of. None whatsoever.
Originally posted by focus4chumps
yet more of quanchi's abysmal stupidity.now cry for 30 more pages.
Originally posted by Badabing
Wrong, you are. Strong with the force, you are notduryoda
Originally posted by -Pr-
So you're not actually replying to anything I'm actually asking, then?All right, I guess. If you decide to actually reply instead of just trying to change the subject, I'll be around... Sort of.
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
A blast missing three klingons.(Quanchi will never be able to mentally process that, let alone admit it)
Originally posted by Lestov16
logic of an insane man
I love these, Quan says Khan has perfect aim and never misses. Then this is presented
Originally posted by The ScenarioDone. Next goalpost?
Originally posted by The ScenarioKhan's blasts hit zero out of four Klingons.
Point proven. Please present you counter evidence. (Not counter argument, you must actually present evidence that counters this or you lose. Do you want to lose?)
What to see Quan’s amazing rebuttal?
Originally posted by quanchi112
We don't see what happened prior to or if he hit someone else. Onus is on you.
Somehow somebody was in front of Khan he was hitting that we can’t see, but this blocked him from shooting actual Klingons dropping down? Odd. Generally things don’t hit invisible targets we can’t see and then re-direct the energy. Odd theory or better yet..
Originally posted by quanchi112
Looks like he was shooting at someone next to the Klingon. If you don't have any real proof you should quit embarrassing yourself.
This is just a small sample of what people think of you in this thread. I could’ve quoted much more, this is only a small sample, but a consistent one.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Someone else made the claim. Onus is on them. I have supplied evidence. It's faulty for anyone to use opinions as more important than evidence. It's all that matters, dumbass.
It doesn't matter what anybody else says. YOU made a claim that the only people voting for Yoda were bias or didn't view the evidence? Shall I quote you making this claim?
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiSo again you quote opinions and nothing definitive. What's even worse that's irrelevant to this thread as its Khan vs Yoda not Khan vs an entire squad of Klingons and a few enterprise members.
I love these, Quan says Khan has perfect aim and never misses. Then this is presentedWhat to see Quan’s amazing rebuttal?
Somehow somebody was in front of Khan he was hitting that we can’t see, but this blocked him from shooting actual Klingons dropping down? Odd. Generally things don’t hit invisible targets we can’t see and then re-direct the energy. Odd theory or better yet..
This is just a small sample of what people think of you in this thread. I could’ve quoted much more, this is only a small sample, but a consistent one.
You can't even come up with your own rebuttals but leech yourself onto another's argument from months back. This is just very sad.
You never contested the actual thread with anything substantial. Ad hominem attacks and plagiarizing someone else's argument isn't debating, virgin.
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiOpinion based has no credence over evidence based debating. I have evidence you don't. Khan wins.
It doesn't matter what anybody else says. YOU made a claim that the only people voting for Yoda were bias or didn't view the evidence? Shall I quote you making this claim?
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Somehow somebody was in front of Khan he was hitting that we can’t see, but this blocked him from shooting actual Klingons dropping down? Odd. Generally things don’t hit invisible targets we can’t see and then re-direct the energy. Odd theory or better yet.. .
This is why no one takes him seriously in debates and it's been this way for years. People debate him just to see him make a complete fool of himself with his powers of strawmanning, point-dodging and context evasion.
To be fair though, in regards to his penchant in always ignoring the context of a scene when it doesn't favor him, he could just really be that stupid and it's not intentional. 50/50.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Opinion based has no credence over evidence based debating. I have evidence you don't. Khan wins.
You have no idea how debating works. If somebody says fire burns things and you say fire doesn't burn things. He needs to prove his case AS DO YOU. You also have to back up your claim that you made. So I'll ask one more time, or I'll accept your concession again.
Do you have facts supporting your claim that the people who voted for Yoda, did so without looking at the evidence and did so out of bias. Which is what I can quote you saying. So do you have the facts to support this or do you not actually know this to be true?
Originally posted by Robtard
This is why no one takes him seriously in debates and it's been this way for years. People debate him just to see him make a complete fool of himself with his powers of strawmanning, point-dodging and context evasion.To be fair though, in regards to his penchant in always ignoring the context of a scene when it doesn't favor him, he could just really be that stupid and it's not intentional. 50/50.
Very true Big Rob.
Yeah, I lean to him just being stupid, I mean, we have mountains of evidence to support that theory.
It's funny that you and I made his top 5 worst posters on the site. Which means, we're actually doing something right lol.
Originally posted by RobtardAnother ad hominem attack completely derailing the relevant points here. What makes this even more special is the fact Robtard rarely if ever debates on kmc these days. If no one took me seriously you wouldn't have a dedicated fanbase quaking in their boots over facing me in a judged debate. Key word is judged, cuck.
This is why no one takes him seriously in debates and it's been this way for years. People debate him just to see him make a complete fool of himself with his powers of strawmanning, point-dodging and context evasion.To be fair though, in regards to his penchant in always ignoring the context of a scene when it doesn't favor him, he could just really be that stupid and it's not intentional. 50/50.