Originally posted by marwash22
ahahahahaha. That doesn't make sense.they took 2 tall people and made one look even taller. That's not an example of taking a short person and making him look the same height as a taller person.
take a seat.
So they took someone and made them look taller? A full foot and a half taller at that. Yet a minute ago you were arguing they don't do that. They just make people look shorter. Make up your mind eh. Or is your argument that they can't make someone shorter look taller than someone who is taller than them in reality?
In which case I go back to LotR/The Hobbit and show how they made Cate Blanchett look taller than Ian McKellan despite her being 3 inches shorter
Amazes me you're actually trying to keep this argument up though. Almost Quan like in its level of stupidity and stubbornness in a vain attempt to save face.
Originally posted by jaden101lol.
So they took someone and made them look taller? A full foot and a half taller at that. Yet a minute ago you were arguing they don't do that. They just make people look shorter. Make up your mind eh. Or is your argument that they can't make someone shorter look taller than someone who is taller than them in reality?In which case I go back to LotR/The Hobbit and show how they made Cate Blanchett look taller than Ian McKellan despite her being 3 inches shorter
Amazes me you're actually trying to keep this argument up though. Almost Quan like in its level of stupidity and stubbornness in a vain attempt to save face.
Camera tricks (making the Rock and Vin look the same height) and completely digitizing someone (Chris Evans in Captain America before the SSS, or the Hobbits from LotR) are not the same thing.
take the L.
I agree the thing with the rock and vin diesel looked stupid and unconvincing. But the fact is you can make someone look taller than they are, Much taller in the case of Michael Clarke Duncan and still look convincing. Trying to argue that they couldn't make a 5ft 7 Kate beckinsale look 6' to 6'2 or there about is just silly and you know it. They did it with Cate Blanchett easily enough. And your final point just solidifies my argument.
I more saw Michael Fassbender as a possible superman cast type. I dunno about batman. At one point John Hamn was rumored to be casted for superman.
I cant think of anyone who could be a good batman other then bale right now...ryan gosslin isnt serious enough IMO, the guy from the notebook to me could never play a emotionless charachter like the bat.
Who else!? Im racking my brain thinking now.
Originally posted by jaden101
But who would you cast?I think Guy Pearce could make a decent batman. Some are arguing Bradley Cooper, Michael Fassbender and even Ryan Gosling but I don't think any of them are right for it.
Cooper and Gosling to my fall in similar type casts, have simmilar looks and such, Bale was so perfect because of his past movies, built a perfect batman...American Pyscho, Equilibrium, The Machiniest and a few others, to me thats why he was the best because he was literally in the training of it before he even was cast to be Bruce Wayne.
I take it you've never seen any of Gosling's other movies such as Drive or The Place beyond the Pines or Only God Forgives. Emotionless and serious are all he seems to do nowadays. I haven't seen Only God Forgives yet but it looks ace.
my problem isn't with his inability to play serious and emotionless but just that he doesn't look right. Same with Fassbender and Cooper. Pearce has the right stare and gritty grim look of Batman. Night be a bit old though. That's the only problem.
Originally posted by Supra
Cooper and Gosling to my fall in similar type casts, have simmilar looks and such, Bale was so perfect because of his past movies, built a perfect batman...American Pyscho, Equilibrium, The Machiniest and a few others, to me thats why he was the best because he was literally in the training of it before he even was cast to be Bruce Wayne.
Can probably leave The machinist off that list. At least from a physical standpoint. Haha. It was an amazing transformation between the machinist and batman begins same with between the fighter and TDKR
Originally posted by jaden101
Can probably leave The machinist off that list. At least from a physical standpoint. Haha. It was an amazing transformation between the machinist and batman begins same with between the fighter and TDKR
I mentioned machinest because it showed his dedication to such a low budget and unknown film, I think it shows great character of what he can and is willing to do to play a part.
Originally posted by jaden101
I take it you've never seen any of Gosling's other movies such as Drive or The Place beyond the Pines or Only God Forgives. Emotionless and serious are all he seems to do nowadays. I haven't seen Only God Forgives yet but it looks ace.my problem isn't with his inability to play serious and emotionless but just that he doesn't look right. Same with Fassbender and Cooper. Pearce has the right stare and gritty grim look of Batman. Night be a bit old though. That's the only problem.
Yes I forgot about those, he did play a pretty good part in them. He is a well versed actor, but im with you he just dose not look the part to me.
Originally posted by jaden101
But who would you cast?I think Guy Pearce could make a decent batman. Some are arguing Bradley Cooper, Michael Fassbender and even Ryan Gosling but I don't think any of them are right for it.
None of them fit Bruce Wayne or Batman.
Bale worked due to his role in American Psycho.
Originally posted by Zack Fair
My definite look for Wonder Woman is Lynda Carter.
Then we disagree.
I'm not really that bothered about the height thing though, tbh. If the actress is hot, can act, and looks convincing in a fight, and they use their normal camera wizardry to make her look a little tall, then that's fine with me.
====
Originally posted by marwash22
Everytime i watch White Collar i see Matt Bomer as Bruce Wayne.
👆
====
Also, Aquaman needs to be in a JL movie, at the very least to add some variety.