Which Zod is better? Michael Shannon or Terence Stamp?

Started by Kotor32 pages

Which Zod is do better Michael Shannon or Terence Stamp?

I do not know if this has already been done but which Zod do you think is more memorable?

Shannon.

Stamp's Zod was a bit too 1 dimensional for my tastes, but that has more to do with the script than the actor.

Who will ultimately be remembered? Stamps. The "kneel before Zod" is just too much.

Stamp's Zod had more of a comic-book (precrisis, yet) sensibility, and you get the impression he had fun with the role, especially delivering his memorable lines.

Shannon was deadly serious, more realistic. I'm not sure how fair it is to even compare the two, but yeah, I think Stamp takes this as far as memorable goes.

I like both Stamp and Shannon portrayal of Zod. I believe both portrayals fit the movie they were in.

I agree Stamp is the more memorable and is my favorite one of the two. Stamp Zod was outright cocky.

One thing I am not getting and that is the word ‘realistic’ that is being used for a comic book character. How is one more realistic then the other?

"Realistic" as far as this subject matter could be taken (perhaps "less comic-booky" would be better?). It's sort of like comparing Caesar Romero's Joker with Heath Ledger's. One is played a bit campy / tongue-in-cheek; the other has a very serious tone.

Shannon..

Stamp was good but was too comic booky which was good for its time

Originally posted by Mindship
"Realistic" as far as this subject matter could be taken (perhaps "less comic-booky" would be better?). It's sort of like comparing Caesar Romero's Joker with Heath Ledger's. One is played a bit campy / tongue-in-cheek; the other has a very serious tone.

Understood.

If it is one issue that I have with Nolan's portrayal of comic book characters (not excluding how he totally destroyed Batman's character for me in TDK) on screen, is that I feel he tries to mix in to much reality instead of leaving some of the comic book feeling in it.

Shannon had a terrifying presence as Zod. Guess because of the more serious tone. Plus he was being genocidal, as compared to Stamp's version who just wanted to rule the planet if I remember correctly.

they both served their purposes.. as far as who is better, well that's up to personal opinions.. shannon zod was definitely more menacing and calculating.. i liked shannon zod, personally speaking of course.. not to say that stamp didn't do his job well as zod..

Shannon's Zod is THE Zod. Son of Terrance Stamp, kneel before Zod!

Shannon's was a more rounded performance, but Stamp's was more memorable imo.

stamp. Shannon was a more new age persona and that's what the kids like. As has been mentioned before in theses MOS threads this new movie is less comic bookish then the past( I personally like the comicbookish style hehhe) But Shannon was still good. as far as who was more menacing, I think shannons Zod had a sense of honor and phucked up integrity in him. He did what he thought was right. I think people forget about how stamps zod took a undefencless astronaut in supermanII through him in the air and jerked out his air line. Remember the look on stamps face? He looked proud of what he did. Almost a sense of passion for suffocating this poor astronaut. Remember where stamp lifted that poor farmer in the air with his hand beam the farmmers 12 year old son bagged him to let him down, and Zod only let him down after the kid showed respect called him general and then dropped the poor farmer 50 feet. Stamps zod was cruel and hateful. Not as dark as shannons but he just was plain evil shannons had as sense of honor in him even if it was misplaced.

I liked both.

Kneel before Zod...it is implied!

Stamp's is far more memorable and entertaining.

Shannon was overacting the whole time; maybe he got confused, thinking he was playing Leonidas? Stamp was the better. S2 was my favorite b/c of the PC Kryptonian, especially Stamp's portrayal.

Michael Shannon

Shannon was the better actor, but his Zod was a shitty villain. There was nothing about his Zod that was memorable in a positive way, there was nothing "zod'ish" about his persona. Nothing. Add onto that that he was extremely incompetent and lost, literally, every fight he or his people were involved in, and you find yourself disappointed.

i love michael shannon. he's among my favorite actors. however man of steel sucked. MoS zod was crappy just as he was poorly written to be.

so: kneel before stamp

Stamp.

Shannon played a great villain but he didn't have to be a revamp of Zod.

If you were old enough to watch Superman 2 on the big screen then Terrance Stamp will always be Zod.