Battle of the Fantasy Teams

Originally posted by NemeBro
It does not.

A fat guy was able to cut him.

Advantage: Ganondorf.

Not Ganondorf's.

Provide evidence of me saying this.

Prove it.

We see a magic sword made by mages harm Ganondorf's body before he had the Triforce of Power.

Correction: He isn't as durable as Superman.

This statement is grammatically unsound.

Define No Limits Fallacy.

His feats.

The fact that Zant with a fraction of his power soloed the Twili and enslaved them.

Plot device. Fat guy stabbing Dorf with Ms would cut him too.

Based on what ?

None needed.

You made the claim.

We don't see his durability increase. Prove it did.

He isn't anywhere near as durable as he is.

You claiming Dorfs powers are basically without limits ie. nothing can kill him save his own plot device weapons which have.

His feats don't suggest he can. Zant had an army. They trapped most of the people as spirits. The army was also pathetic and lacked numbers, leadership, and anyone of note.

Zant made his army from the Twili after he subjugated them.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Zant made his army from the Twili after he subjugated them.

Originally posted by quanchi112
None needed.

There is actually.

Let me make this clear: you do not claim I said anything without providing proof I did so. If you can not do so, shut the **** up and troll somewhere else.

Originally posted by NemeBro
There is actually.

Let me make this clear: you do not claim I said anything without providing proof I did so. If you can not do so, shut the **** up and troll somewhere else.

So you admit that you lied then?

Originally posted by NemeBro
So you admit that you lied then?

Point out where I claimed others claimed something they did not.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Point out where I claimed others claimed something they did not.

Originally posted by quanchi112
That isn't what you said. An arrow piercing these doesn't always result in this.
It's the magical connection and they have means to block magic from hitting their wands. We see magic clash all the time.
You conceded. It's fine .

Yes, a magical bond. Never has it been stated that they become super tough, so they don't.

How about you get off your 'nah you lose I win' high horse when you know you've got nothing?

Originally posted by quanchi112
So you're biased.

Originally posted by BloodRain
Tearing the wing membrane would mess with flight and its a low chance a chest hit wont damage the heart or lungs, that's beside basic damage on the chance it misses those spots. The fact is that 1 bear > 3 wolves just as 1 durable elephant sized Dragon > 3 dog sized baby dragons.

Yes, a magical bond. Never has it been stated that they become super tough, so they don't.

How about you get off your 'nah you lose I win' high horse when you know you've got nothing?

The fact remains your examples are off. Wolves lack fire which incinerates and changes thing as opposed to just one big animal to three smaller ones without flame breath.

I always have something.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You said piercing the wing that doesn't mean they cannot fly.

The fact remains your examples are off. Wolves lack fire which incinerates and changes thing as opposed to just one big animal to three smaller ones without flame breath.

I always have something.

Examples aren't meant to be literal comparisons, notice how bears don't fly or breath fire either. A bear is to a large, fire breathing/flying dragon and 3 wolves are to 3 smaller dragons. Especially when arrows can take do damage to them.

Then kindly point to how a bond will stop Dalf from destroying Tom's wand.

Originally posted by BloodRain
An arrow would tear the wing, its just a membrane of skin. And I said mess with flight not halt it altogether. Either way an arrow would be damaging to them no matter where it lands.

Examples aren't meant to be literal comparisons, notice how bears don't fly or breath fire either. A bear is to a large, fire breathing/flying dragon and 3 wolves are to 3 smaller dragons. Especially when arrows can take do damage to them.

Then kindly point to how a bond will stop Dalf from destroying Tom's wand.

One larger target compared to three targets all capable of fire breathing is pretty obvious that would be more dangerous,

Dalf cannot do so against someone more powerful than he is.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I never said an arrow would not damage them I said three dragons breathing fire in multiple directions is harder to defend against than one bigger easier to hit target dragon.
One larger target compared to three targets all capable of fire breathing is pretty obvious that would be more dangerous,

Dalf cannot do so against someone more powerful than he is.

A large, highly durable, fire breathing dragon... Three small, not durable, fire breathing dragons. Anyone would take three wolves over a bear, three orcs instead of a troll (LotR), three trolls instead of a giant (HP), three Flare Dancers over Volvagia (OoT).

You haven't said how a Wizards power increases the durability of their wands.

Couldn't Voldy apparate and cast Immobulus/Avada Kadavra while the Basilisk kills people with it's stare?

Originally posted by Impediment
Couldn't Voldy apparate and cast Immobulus/Avada Kadavra while the Basilisk kills people with it's stare?

Except the White Walker with its necromancy powers only, its not the mage the other three are. (is it even technically 'living'?)

Originally posted by BloodRain
It's not like Link has never dealt with groups before, and if arrows can inflict heavy damage?

A large, highly durable, fire breathing dragon... Three small, not durable, fire breathing dragons. Anyone would take three wolves over a bear, three orcs instead of a troll (LotR), three trolls instead of a giant (HP), three Flare Dancers over Volvagia (OoT).

You haven't said how a Wizards power increases the durability of their wands.

Three flames make it harder to defend against then one stream. They are also quicker.

Gandalf only did so to someone he was more powerful than. He isn't more powerful than Voldemort.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Link did not face 3 dragons before. You are assuming he easily puts the arrows where he wants to while avoiding three dragons breathing fire his way,

Three flames make it harder to defend against then one stream. They are also quicker.

Gandalf only did so to someone he was more powerful than. He isn't more powerful than Voldemort.

In this situation the dragons are equally surrounding him syncing up their flames? Faster?

Where was that ever stated or hinted at?