Battle of the Fantasy Teams

Started by quanchi1129 pages

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
How many zelda games have you beat?
2nd one, ALTTP, and Tp.

You thought adventures of link was repetitive and easy?

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
You thought adventures of link was repetitive and easy?

When he says 'beat' I'm fairly sure he means 'played when I was young' in terms of LoZ2 and aLttP, his knowledge of those games is pretty spotty. shrug

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
You thought adventures of link was repetitive and easy?
The whole dungeon thing is repetitive and lame.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
When he says 'beat' I'm fairly sure he means 'played when I was young' in terms of LoZ2 and aLttP, his knowledge of those games is pretty spotty. shrug
I beat them when I was young. If I included games I played I'd include the first and OOT.

You can't beat OoT while in your 30's, you expect me to believe you ever beat LoZ2, or aLttP?

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
You can't beat OoT while in your 30's, you expect me to believe you ever beat LoZ2, or aLttP?
Yes, and age does not really matter here. Why would I lie about beating certain ones ?

Originally posted by quanchi112
That isn't official. I went through the game and this never happened.
That is different entirely as he makes it through Zelda but this is a versus thread where the hero can die.

Lotr staffs only work due to being more powerful so we can't conveniently ignore the reasoning to sell your flimsy points.

Yeah I just said you want to ignore official items etc. Expert marksman is thus.
You didnt answer the question. Can you state that baby dragons would be more challenging than what he's faced throughout TP? Yes or no?

LotR staffs need to be overpowered, HP wands do not. HP wants get destroyed by simple force and weak magic spells hitting them so are not the same durability wise.

Originally posted by BloodRain
Yeah I just said you want to ignore official items etc. Expert marksman is thus.
You didnt answer the question. Can you state that baby dragons would be more challenging than what he's faced throughout TP? Yes or no?

LotR staffs need to be overpowered, HP wands do not. HP wants get destroyed by simple force and weak magic spells hitting them so are not the same durability wise.

It isn't absolutely necessary so it isn't canon.

Tree dragons at once would be harder to beat than what he faced,

Hp wands needs to be overpowered since that is the only way Lotr wands destroy them.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, and age does not really matter here. Why would I lie about beating certain ones ?

The same reason you make up random shit to support your stances?

Originally posted by quanchi112
It isn't absolutely necessary so it isn't canon.

Tree dragons at once would be harder to beat than what he faced,

Hp wands needs to be overpowered since that is the only way Lotr wands destroy them.


Devs > You

No, lol.

Don't care about this point.

Ganon solos.

Actually Scream I'd like your opinion about the wand issue just so I know which side holds more water.

LotR lore has it that you destroy a wizards staff by being stronger than the wielder. HP lore has no such trait and can be destroyed by most things. Would Dalf need to overpower Tom's magic to destroy his wand, or just destroy his wand because it lacks durability?

Originally posted by quanchi112
It isn't absolutely necessary so it isn't canon.
Tree dragons at once would be harder to beat than what he faced,

Hp wands needs to be overpowered since that is the only way Lotr wands destroy them.

You may as well start stating that that item doesn't exist at all. Its denying official material. Hell you could even take away the 'expert' part and just call Link a 'decent' archer and the same conclusion can be drawn.

Care to prove this?

No, that's the method to destroy LotR staffs, not HP wands. Stop avoiding the fact here.

Actually Scream I'd like your opinion about the wand issue just so I know which side holds more water.

Well, I've barely been paying attention to that point tbh, but looking over what's being said on this page...

Hp wands needs to be overpowered since that is the only way Lotr wands destroy them.

This point doesn't make any sense. Nothing stops force being applied to an HP wand by a wizard's staff just because the method of destroying a wizard's staff is different. An HP wand is not a wizard's staff, it's a stick with a magical core and it's used differently and has the durability of a stick with a magical core. We know they break in universe from use and are even repaired with tape, lol.

I'm of the mind that if we're talking specifically about a spell clash that it might be harder under that circumstance but Gandalf should win that anyway.

So in short, a wand is not a wizard staff, it's rules are not the same.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
The same reason you make up random shit to support your stances?

Devs > You

No, lol.

Don't care about this point.

Ganon solos.

I cite evidence for my theories. I don't care what needs think.

It isn't canon just a possibility. He can also miss.

You concede.

He couldn't even defeat sages or Link. Guy is a failure.

Originally posted by BloodRain
Actually Scream I'd like your opinion about the wand issue just so I know which side holds more water.

LotR lore has it that you destroy a wizards staff by being stronger than the wielder. HP lore has no such trait and can be destroyed by most things. Would Dalf need to overpower Tom's magic to destroy his wand, or just destroy his wand because it lacks durability?
You may as well start stating that that item doesn't exist at all. Its denying official material. Hell you could even take away the 'expert' part and just call Link a 'decent' archer and the same conclusion can be drawn.

Care to prove this?

No, that's the method to destroy LotR staffs, not HP wands. Stop avoiding the fact here.

It isn't canon just a possibility. You can miss too. You are saying he hits first shot without even needing to ompletrlynchqning fame here.

3 dragons breathing fire from three different angles makes it pretty clear.

The same mets applies as its just a staff without a wizard wielding it.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I cite evidence for my theories. I don't care what needs think.

It isn't canon just a possibility. He can also miss.

You concede.

He couldn't even defeat sages or Link. Guy is a failure.


Then prove, with evidence, that anyone in this thread has a hope against Ganondorf.

Devs > You.

Ganon soloes with a twilight field.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Then prove, with evidence, that anyone in this thread has a hope against Ganondorf.

Devs > You.

Ganon soloes with a twilight field.

Ak, destroy his body, Crucio.

It isn't canon.

Show him using this in combat.

Except Ak has absolutely no effect on the body...

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
Except Ak has absolutely no effect on the body...
Ak kills him or destroying his body by blasting or fire snake.

Which of his spells destroys bodies?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Ak, destroy his body, Crucio.

It isn't canon.

Show him using this in combat.


Too much magic resistance, too durable, too much magic resistance.

Devs > You

Zant did so against Lanayru. Show AK killing someone with magic resistance. 🙂