Iron Man (616) v.s. Voldemort

Started by ScreamPaste2 pages

Iron Man (616) v.s. Voldemort

New York City. Voldemort apparates and starts casting spells on people. Stark decides he's a dick and confronts him. They start 20 meters apart.

How fast is Voldemort's reaction speed?

Originally posted by SevenShackles
How fast is Voldemort's reaction speed?

I can't recall any impressive feats for him that way, tbh. I truly believe this to be spite. The suit should protect Iron Man from Voldemort's spells as we've seen they can be blocked by physical objects before, and the suit is completely environmentally sealed, forming a perfect wall against them.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Voldemort kills IronMan as well as Ganondorf.

Someone thinks Voldemort can win though so I suppose the thread is valid.

Yeah.. Ironman should win here more so if it's his comic incarnation.

I disagree on the suit protecting him, but he should be too fast for that to be an issue.

is stark's comic book feats involved

Originally posted by SevenShackles
How fast is Voldemort's reaction speed?

As fast as a top tier Mathlete i'd reckon.

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
is stark's comic book feats involved

616 indicates it's mainstream comic ironman being used here.

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
I disagree on the suit protecting him, but he should be too fast for that to be an issue.

In the Harry Potter movies we've seen killing curses and even Fiendfyre stopped by something as simple as a block of stone.

616 Iron Man trivially solos the HP-verse....

.... he speedblitzes Voldemort to oblivion

Originally posted by KingD19
In the Harry Potter movies we've seen killing curses and even Fiendfyre stopped by something as simple as a block of stone.

Because it's not alive. Tony is wearing the suit and is alive.

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
Because it's not alive. Tony is wearing the suit and is alive.

So if it hits a shield being held by a man doesn't the man still get effected?

Probably. Wizards use to wear armor in the dark ages but stopped at one point to allow greater movement. If armor was all it took to stop the killing curse, why didn't harry show up to the final battle ib Kevlar?

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
Probably. Wizards use to wear armor in the dark ages but stopped at one point to allow greater movement. If armor was all it took to stop the killing curse, why didn't harry show up to the final battle ib Kevlar?
I think there's some weird line between clothing and shielding that's a little indistinct here. We know that someone behind a wall is safe, and armour is implied to be effective on some level. Clothing obviously isn't, though. Making a shirt out of steel makes it which? shrug

The Iron Man suit is environmentally sealed and insulated, it's enough separation that to my mind it's effective protection. Even so the spell will never land, so lol. Iron Man pulps him with a single attack.

Except when Ak hits something not worn like a rock or a tapestry, the object gets destroyed. Something is different when that material is put over a living thing that causes the spell to pass through the material.

Movie IronMan would stomp Tom, wtf? 😐

Forget that. Movie Stark with prep (ala IM3) could put a good fight.

This is comicbook Iron Man. 😛

Thats my point, if Movie IM stomps what do we call what Comic IM's going to do to him? O__o

Sexy?

Iron Man sexies Voldemort.