Thor vs A Planet

Started by JakeTheBank19 pages
Originally posted by abhilegend

Its both flowery dialogue and the art I guess.

Anything specific?

Originally posted by zopzop
WHAT evidence? Don't you get it? What evidence do you have of Thor busting a planet that's not a shared feat? This is actually an easy one for team Thor since you have DECADES of appearances on your side.

Again, examples have already been posted and explained.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
So does Gorr's weapons produce shockwaves or not?

Or did Gorr himself being the target of Mjolnir mean that his body contributed to the damage of the planet by taking the damage from Mjolnir?

Those are really the only viable stances you could possibly have given your stance that this was a shared feat.

Perhaps the narration can provide some insight banke?

Originally posted by abhilegend
The same scene which you tried to refute by a writer's interview? Remind you of something?

Please show us that planet totally shattered then. Shouldn't be hard.

Drawing a blank tbh. Do you have scans?

You've already seen the scans.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Anything specific?

Not enough Superman.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Anything specific?

Nah. Its the whole fight. BTW I'm not saying its a bad book, its good. Not for my tastes I guess.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Drawing a blank tbh. Do you have scans?

😂

The fight between superman and Kal-L?

You've already seen the scans.
Which showed a destroyed planet? Where?

Not enough Superman.

That's your problem with thor.

Originally posted by dmills
Perhaps the narration can provide some insight banke?

Narration is clearly attributing the bludgeoning, which causes the worlds around him to begin to break, to Thor and Mjolnir. Gorr being the target of that doesn't mean he "helped" produce that force. And there's nothing about that scene through any dialogue or art that suggests that Gorr was producing any kind of force like Thor was.

Originally posted by abhilegend
😂

The fight between superman and Kal-L?

Which showed a destroyed planet? Where?

That's your problem with thor.

Show on panel a world being destroyed. We don't accept nonsense hyperbole like on panel narration here do we?

Originally posted by abhilegend
Yes. But that blast obviously had no effect on the moon. Obviously.

Lol, I was genuinely curious. I don't recall them leaving the orbit of that moon/planet that was affected by their battle until the very end when they all flew into the sun.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Narration is clearly attributing the bludgeoning, which causes the worlds around him to begin to break, to Thor and Mjolnir. Gorr being the target of that doesn't mean he "helped" produce that force. And there's nothing about that scene through any dialogue or art that suggests that Gorr was producing any kind of force like Thor was.

that new thor series is metal as phuck

Originally posted by psycho gundam
that new thor series is metal as phuck

👆

Originally posted by The Sorrow
Lol, I was genuinely curious. I don't recall them leaving the orbit of that moon/planet that was affected by their battle until the very end when they all flew into the sun.

Young Thor knocked Gorr through a wormhole taking the fight like light years away from the moon King Thor blasted Gorr into.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Show on panel a world being destroyed. We don't accept nonsense hyperbole like on panel narration here do we?

Like you are doing? I'm accepting that the planet was starting to break after several strikes. Also in superman's case it was both character statementS and narration telling us so.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Narration is clearly attributing the bludgeoning, which causes the worlds around him to begin to break, to Thor and Mjolnir. Gorr being the target of that doesn't mean he "helped" produce that force. And there's nothing about that scene through any dialogue or art that suggests that Gorr was producing any kind of force like Thor was.

The sense of scope/scale in both the actual art depiction and in the corresponding narration is amazing. A dying art in comics imo.

Originally posted by dmills
The sense of scope/scale in both the actual art depiction and in the corresponding narration is amazing. A dying art in comics imo.

Read Pak's hulk then.

uhuh

Originally posted by abhilegend
Read Pak's hulk then.

uhuh

Outside of Planet Hulk, utter shit.

I still don't front Pak for pushing Hulk as far as he could though. But I'm not a fan of the character so that's just me I guess.

Also I don't know why Thor fans are so psyched by this feat when this isn't even a strength feat but a striking feat? Haven't they said countless times that Gladiator's feat of destroying "a large space rock" doesn't means much in terms of fights?

Originally posted by dmills
Outside of Planet Hulk, utter shit.

I still don't front Pak for pushing Hulk as far as he could though. But I'm not a fan of the character so that's just me I guess.


I was joking brah. This series isn't good because of power feats, its good because it shows Thor at his best, a noble warrior god with the heart of a man against impossible odds.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Also I don't know why Thor fans are so psyched by this feat when this isn't even a strength feat but a striking feat? Haven't they said countless times that Gladiator's feat of destroying "a large space rock" doesn't means much in terms of fights?

I don't recall any of them ever saying that, let alone saying it often enough to justify saying "countless times", can you provide some examples?

Originally posted by abhilegend
Also I don't know why Thor fans are so psyched by this feat when this isn't even a strength feat but a striking feat?