Originally posted by quanchi112'Principal enemy' = Greatest enemy = Archenemy.
No, it isn't he's his reoccurring or principal enemy. You're too dumb to even understand the words you cling to.When I say arch enemy i refer to reoccurring rogue you twit. 😂
Doomsday is a far greater rogue than his reoccurring one. 😂
funnyanimation8
Originally posted by Adam GrimesI will even use wiki since its Roberta's bible.
'Principal enemy' = Greatest enemy = Archenemy.funnyanimation8
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Jump to: navigation, search. For other uses, see Archenemy (disambiguation). An archenemy, archfoe, archvillain, or nemesis (sometimes spelled arch-enemy, arch-foe, or arch-villain) is the principal enemy of someone or something.
If you think Luthor is greater than Darkseid is as a threat to Superman you're a troll. Recurring villain or archenemy isn't his greatest rogue. Darkseid and Doomsday are far greater threats than this own personal whipping boy, Luthor.
😂 😆 💃 🤣
Once again you don't understand what "archenemy" means, it means "principal enemy", which Luthor is. You were wrong and you keep upping the stupid instead of just admitting you were wrong.
arch·en·e·my
\(ˌ)ärch-ˈe-nə-mē\
noun
: someone's main enemy
Full Definition
plural arch·en·e·mies
:a principal enemy
From merriam-webster, now argue that the dictionary is wrong.
Originally posted by RobtardLuthor is his main enemy but not his greatest enemy. Words and Robbie don't mix. Darkseid is a far greater enemy than Luthor is to Superman. Do you agree ?
Once again you don't understand what "archenemy" means, it means "principal enemy", which Luthor is. You were wrong and you keep upping the stupid instead of just admitting you were wrong.arch·en·e·my
\(ˌ)ärch-ˈe-nə-mē\
noun
: someone's main enemy
Full Definition
plural arch·en·e·mies
[b]:a principal enemyFrom merriam-webster, now argue that the dictionary is wrong. [/B]
It's obvious to everyone that followed the topic that you meant 'archenemy' when you said 'greatest' in regards to Doomsday otherwise you wouldn't have kept contesting me saying "Luthor is his Arch-nemesis" like you did for pages, you've since tried to spin it to something else and people are mocking you for it.
Originally posted by RobtardNo, it's obvious I didn't mean greatest when I said greatest. Archenemy doesn't mean greatest it means principal aka recurring. You're an idiot and no matter how many idiots you bring over they can't change the definition of the ord.
It's obvious to everyone that followed the topic that you meant 'archenemy' when you said 'greatest' in regards to Doomsday otherwise you wouldn't have kept contesting me saying "Luthor is his Arch-nemesis" like you did for pages, you've since tried to spin it to something else and people are mocking you for it.
I knew you'd avoid my question because you're an idiot and always fall into a rage loop. Again you're an idiot.
Originally posted by quanchi112
No, it's obvious I didn't mean greatest when I said greatest. Archenemy doesn't mean greatest it means principal aka recurring. You're an idiot and no matter how many idiots you bring over they can't change the definition of the ord.I knew you'd avoid my question because you're an idiot and always fall into a rage loop. Again you're an idiot.
You didn't mean "greatest" when you said "greatest"? You've spun around so much in here that you're stumbling over your own nonsense. Look at your blinding rage at me. LoL.
Your question was stupid, why it was ignored. Even if we go with your new spins of "greatest = most powerful", you're still wrong in regards to Doomsday being Superman's most powerful villain. You're DC ignorant, likely comic ignorant all around. Do you even comic?
Originally posted by RobtardI was being sarcastic. Doomsday is a greater villain than Luthor is for Superman to overcome.
You didn't mean "greatest" when you said "greatest"? You've spun around so much in here that you're stumbling over your own nonsense. Look at your blinding rage at me. LoL.Your question was stupid, why it was ignored. Even if we go with your new spins of "greatest = most powerful", you're still wrong in regards to Doomsday being Superman's most powerful villain. You're DC ignorant, likely comic ignorant all around. Do you even comic?
I didn't say doomsday was the most powerful I said he was one of the greater rogues. Luthor is an arch nemesis aka the villain of the week superman routinely beats. Learn what words mean before you argue next time.
🙂
Hilarious. You're constantly changing what you said, you opened up with Doomsday being Superman's "greatest" rogue, which depending on the flips you're doing at the moment could mean his Arch or most powerful; now you've changed it to "one of the greater" in another sad, sad, sad attempt to save face.
I stand by my original "Luthor is generally considered Superman's Arch-nemesis", my point hasn't changed at all, unlike yours constantly changing to cover up your mistakes. Not on my watch though, quan.
Warner Bros clearly has big plans for its growing DC movie universe, with next year's Batman V Superman: Dawn Of Justice and Suicide Squad to be followed by Justice League, Wonder Woman and Aquaman. There's also the small matter of Ben Affleck's stand-alone Batman film, which he'll write and direct.We've now heard, however, that Affleck's role in the DC movies is about to get even bigger.
According to an industry source who will remain anonymous, a cut of Batman V Superman: Dawn Of Justice was screened for the film's crew and Warner bosses within the past 24 hours or so. "It's a near finished cut but not locked," our source tells us.
That screening was, we're told, a glowing success - to the point where Zack Snyder's movie received a "standing ovation".
Warner is said to be so impressed with Affleck's performance as Batman that it's apparently in the process of making an extended, "Golden deal", which could see the actor play the Caped Crusader in a trilogy of stand-alone movies, not the single outing already announced.
All told, this deal could see Affleck in the role of Batman for the next 10 years or so.
"Basically, Warners are now working their movie universe around Ben's Batman," our source says.
As far as Warner's bosses are concerned, Affleck is considered to be the "definitive Batman" and could be the hub around which the DC movie universe will rotate in future movies.
Hopefully this is true.
http://www.denofgeek.us/movies/batman/248269/report-affleck-to-star-in-3-stand-alone-batman-movies