Originally posted by CosmicCometHis entire world is crashing down around him and I'm going to be there when he finally breaks.
Golgo with the backtracking.He was all about the positive buzz that was going on when there were impressions from the press screenings and such, which of course all came from the enthusiasts, which should naturally make up a large portion of such things.
Originally posted by Zack MWith a grain of salt except when they say good things.
😂 so nothing per usual. I've been praising what I've seen from the movie for the past 3 years, sure. Most of the trailers looked awesome, the batsuit, batmobile, ww look, irons as alfred, etc... and from the sounds of it, they are the highlights of the film. Far cry from when they were first announced and people were shitting on it before they even started shooting the movie.I'm sure the editing and forced world building are problems. I never said they wouldn't be. That was one of the problems MOS had was the editing and it looks like it's a bigger problem here. Without seeing it, I can't say for certain that it will or won't affect my enjoyment of the movie, but I'm not going to let the RT score ruin the movie of all things and I take what every review and critic with a grain of salt, because I generally find my tastes in certain genres different from theirs.
Originally posted by CosmicCometThat too.
Golgo with the backtracking.He was all about the positive buzz that was going on when there were impressions from the press screenings and such, which of course all came from the enthusiasts, which should naturally make up a large portion of such things.
Though he's not lying when he said he takes it with a grain of salt. Mind you it's a huge chunk of salt. You'd need a bobcat to move the pieces of salt he takes those first impressions with
Originally posted by CosmicComet
Golgo with the backtracking.He was all about the positive buzz that was going on when there were impressions from the press screenings and such, which of course all came from the enthusiasts, which should naturally make up a large portion of such things.
How am I backtracking? The movies not even out yet, so we don't know how much of a crowd pleaser it will be. Those positive reactions still exist.
Originally posted by One Big Mob
With a grain of salt except when they say good things.
That too.Though he's not lying when he said he takes it with a grain of salt. Mind you it's a huge chunk of salt. You'd need a bobcat to move the pieces of salt he takes those first impressions with
I said take with a grain of salt even with good things. Not my problem you can't read.
Originally posted by CosmicComet
Been with this since 2013.
I should've been on since 2013, too. I thought adding Affleck and Terrio would help Snyder, but a director shouldn't need that much help just to tell a decent story. I even thought this to myself before BvS: DoJ had the massive outpouring of critical shame against it.
Originally posted by Zack MExcept when you post them to try and say good things about them. When you rave about the first impressions. When you try to refute a majority of critics by saying Eisenlex is 50/50 against people using it to say he's bad.
I said take with a grain of salt even with good things. Not my problem you can't read.
Also you did not say you take the good things with a grain of salt. You flowed from them ruining the enjoyment of the movie for you to saying you take them with a grain of salt. Ie you take them with a grain of salt as to not ruin the movie.
I can't read things you didn't say Golgz.
Also I noticed your little strategy. All you do is argue with negative views while trying to keep you from outright saying you think it's the best thing ever. You want people to think they're wrong about negative feedback, but you don't want to personally say they're wrong. Which is defeated considering every single post from you is only meant to try and take negatives away from the movie to see it in a positive light. Ie you're trying to make people think good things about it.
Which I know it's painfully obvious that you're a shill, but there's a slightly deeper level to it.
Originally posted by One Big Mob
Except when you post them to try and say good things about them. When you rave about the first impressions. When you try to refute a majority of critics by saying Eisenlex is 50/50 against people using it to say he's bad.Also you did not say you take the good things with a grain of salt. You flowed from them ruining the enjoyment of the movie for you to saying you take them with a grain of salt. Ie you take them with a grain of salt as to not ruin the movie.
I can't read things you didn't say Golgz.
Also I noticed your little strategy. All you do is argue with negative views while trying to keep you from outright saying you think it's the best thing ever. You want people to think they're wrong about negative feedback, but you don't want to personally say they're wrong. Which is defeated considering every single post from you is only meant to try and take negatives away from the movie to see it in a positive light. Ie you're trying to make people think good things about it.
Which I know it's painfully obvious that you're a shill, but there's a slightly deeper level to it.
Except i did, dummy. Try reading the posts. Plus I was the first one to post the mixed reactions that Devon mentioned several weeks ago. Try harder.
Originally posted by Zack MNo you didn't. I don't know if you missed a word or something (since it's incoherant anyway) but you did not. Following simple sentence structure you said critics wouldn't ruin the movie since you take what they say with a grain of salt. Which sure, good could fall under that, but there was no allusion to that. Especially when you continue posting good parts of reviews like they hold merit, when you rave about first impressions. Because you cannot stop backtracking.
Except i did, dummy. Try reading the posts. Plus I was the first one to post the mixed reactions that Devon mentioned several weeks ago. Try harder.
Originally posted by Zack MThat all you do is post positive things to try and offset the negatives. You're letting examples speak the words that you don't want to commit to.
What? This will likely open big. I guess all you want to do is post negative stuff. You hardly ever posted in this thread, only until it got bad to mixed reviews. Sad.
I don't want to post negative things though. I've barely said anything bad about the movie. What I want however is for you to stop being a blatant hypocrite and shill.
And what does it matter how long I've posted in this thread? Is it not a good thing that I don't have a longstanding hatred of this movie?
I came in here to go against using IGN because it's shit. No amount of them being right can change that. Then I spoiled the entire movie and saw some really shitty scenes and saw you playing fast and loose with what you wanted to accept and I said hey cut that out in the nicest way possible.