Originally posted by Zack M
Ben knows martial arts. 😉
what styles???
don't have time quote posting everyone , so will just say it here as pertained to Suoergirl.. Her ratings suck, In fact they were in the toilet at the time of the Flash crossover.. After tomorrows season finale, CBS will take the time to think about renewal..
Originally posted by Ridley_PrimeI saw the first 4 or 5 episodes of Gotham and didn't care for it. That said I felt the same way about Agents of Shield's first 10 or so episodes, but I stuck it out until season 3 and now the show is at least interesting.
How much of Gotham have you seen? Only watched the first season but I thought it was great, for a grounded gritty take on pre-Batman era of the city.Agree on the other shows though. Legends of Tomorrow (since it wasn't brought up) has still been pretty fun too; just hope it doesn't go hugely downhill at some point like Arrow did.
Originally posted by Ridley_Prime
I wouldn't say that, though even before BvS was out, the Marvel and DC shows looked more interesting than the rushed direction the Synderverse had taken.
Originally posted by Firefly218
I saw the first 4 or 5 episodes of Gotham and didn't care for it. That said I felt the same way about Agents of Shield's first 10 or so episodes, but I stuck it out until season 3 and now the show is at least interesting.
Originally posted by Zack M
Flash and Supergirl have good ratings from last I've seen and they are renewing most shows.Console gaming is another.
Supergirl ratings have dropped as badly as AOS did in its first season.
Flash has been pretty consistent in its ratings so far to the extent where Agent Carter has dropped below it and AOS looks to be dropping below it as well. Gotham doesn't look far behind that drop.
But In terms of quality no comic book show sans Walking Dead even touches The Flash IMO.
Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8g0SdpF0v0k
Originally posted by Silent Master
Labeling something as art doesn't make it immune to measuring/judging it's quality.
Right but it's "subjective" not "objective".
I say BvS was fun, you say it was trash. How do you "objectively" prove me wrong?
I say Bad Boys was great, the critics majority say it was Rotten. How do they "objectively" prove me wrong.
Originally posted by HulkIsHulkThis movie, as I said, isn't going to make $900 million. And honestly, the fact it's made over $800 million kinda sucks. It would have been better if it had completely bombed and not just by critics. If it would have made even less than it did WB would have no choice but to fire Snyder...as of now it gives them just enough (stupidity) courage to keep him.
close to 900 mil probs
Originally posted by Darth Thor
Right but it's "subjective" not "objective".I say BvS was fun, you say it was trash. How do you "objectively" prove me wrong?
I say Bad Boys was great, the critics majority say it was Rotten. How do they "objectively" prove me wrong.
Just like they did with BvS, they list all the problems the movie had..IIRC you even agreed with them on several points.
Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
This movie, as I said, isn't going to make $900 million. And honestly, the fact it's made over $800 million kinda sucks. It would have been better if it had completely bombed and not just by critics. If it would have made even less than it did WB would have no choice but to fire Snyder...as of now it gives them just enough (stupidity) courage to keep him.
850-860 is where it's headed.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Just like they did with BvS, they list all the problems the movie had..IIRC you even agreed with them on several points.
I agree the film had some editing problems. Think the same about AVengers:AOU tbh. But others might feel both those movies flowed perfectly for them. So there's no quantative science to it.
What's objective is a statement like BvS grossed more money than Winter Soldier. Or Deadpool made more profit than BvS. Because those are figures that can be measured.