Gibraltor and the Malvinas

Started by Paul Calf1 pages

Gibraltor and the Malvinas

Is self determination acceptable when the colonised people are descendants of the British after the original inhabitants had been expelled?

The alternative is that they be colonized under dubious historical claims. Argentina has next to no claim on the Falklands, and they have no claim whatsoever on South Georgia, despite their insistence to the contrary. As for Gibraltar, the Spanish are just butthurt and have been since the dawn of the 18th century.

**** all those filthy gobbledy-gook speaking brown people. They're ours.

KAPOW!!!! RACISM!!!

Originally posted by Omega Vision
The alternative is that they be colonized under dubious historical claims. Argentina has next to no claim on the Falklands, and they have no claim whatsoever on South Georgia, despite their insistence to the contrary. As for Gibraltar, the Spanish are just butthurt and have been since the dawn of the 18th century.

They're closer, so their claim is more valid. /thread

Keep your grubby hands off of Falklands.

While everyone's at it, France should reassert claim to the Channel Islands.

Mexico should reassert claim on California and Texas.