Are any of you familiar with vacuum polarization beyond the standard model?

Started by Astner3 pages
Astner The Ghost Who Walks

Are any of you familiar with vacuum polarization beyond the standard model?

Because I need help simplifying this expression,

into this,

where the asterisk denotes that it's an irreducible single particle representation, and.

dadudemon Senior Member

You need to carry the 1 into the tens place.

Omega Vision Face Flowed Into Her Eyes

Can't tell if Dadudemon is being helpful or flippant... mhmm

g_serious

Bardock42 Junior Member

No

Astner The Ghost Who Walks

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Can't tell if Dadudemon is being helpful or flippant... mhmm

It's an algebraic expression, he's making an ass out of himself.

Bardock42 Junior Member

Did you try to reverse the polarity, though?

Master Han Restricted

Have you tried wolfram alpha? 😉

But IDK why you think KMC forums has many people who can do this...

Bardock42 Junior Member

Originally posted by Master Han
Have you tried wolfram alpha? 😉

But IDK why you think KMC forums has many people who can do this...

I don't think receiving help was in any way, shape or form the intention of this thread.

Symmetric Chaos Fractal King

If you can't do calculus you should be in a different line of work.

Lord Lucien Lets all love Lain

Re: Are any of you familiar with vacuum polarization beyond the standard model?

Originally posted by Astner
Because I need help simplifying this expression,

into this,

where the asterisk denotes that it's an irreducible single particle representation, and.

This equation is screwed up, I'm afraid. It deduces that pi exactly 3.

Astner The Ghost Who Walks

Never-mind, I was able to solve it.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Did you try to reverse the polarity, though?

The expression represents the sum of all connected graphs, with two external photon lines, and with polarization indices μ and ν carrying four-momentum q into and out of a diagram.

Originally posted by Master Han
Have you tried wolfram alpha?

I have Mathematica, and no, it can't be used to solve these type of problems.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
If you can't do calculus you should be in a different line of work.

This isn't calculus, this is group field theory.

Master Han Restricted
Originally posted by Astner
Never-mind, I was able to solve it.

I don't doubt you, but out of curiosity, would you mind posting how you did it?

Astner The Ghost Who Walks

Originally posted by Master Han
I don't doubt you, but out of curiosity, would you mind posting how you did it?

Yeah, I'm rewriting it in TeX right now. You might have to wait until tomorrow though because it's five pages on paper, and I have work in the morning.

focus4chumps Restricted

does it make you feel superior to post calculus problems on a forum in which the most popular topics tend to be "which fictional character wins in h2h combat"?

Bardock42 Junior Member
Originally posted by focus4chumps
does it make you feel superior to post calculus problems on a forum in which the most popular topics tend to be "which fictional character wins in h2h combat"?

That's ridiculous.

It makes him feel superior to post group field theory problems on a forum in which the most popular topics tend to be "which fictional character wins in h2h combat"

focus4chumps Restricted

oh right. what i meant to do was nod my head and pretend to understand like everyone else does in these threads. right ddm?

Master Han Restricted
Originally posted by Astner
Yeah, I'm rewriting it in TeX right now. You might have to wait until tomorrow though because it's five pages on paper, and I have work in the morning.

Um, if you're just doing it for us, it's really ok, lol. But I assume you're not.

Mindship Snap out of it.

Originally posted by Astner
Because I need help simplifying this expression,

into this,

where the asterisk denotes that it's an irreducible single particle representation, and.

😐

This is the calculational equivalent of benching 400 pounds.

Actually, I do find the concept of vacuum polarization fascinating. For me, it really drives home the idea of an active vacuum and of the close relationship between spacetime, matter and energy (or so I think).

Symmetric Chaos Fractal King
Originally posted by Astner
This isn't calculus, this is group field theory.

"This isn't addition, this is adding together the number of eggs in each hen house."

Originally posted by Master Han
Um, if you're just doing it for us, it's really ok, lol. But I assume you're not.

He's worried about his e-penis. This is the equivalent of flashing other dudes in a locker room.

Reflection Restricted

Haha, someone wants to show off.