Strength Test!!!

Started by h1a811 pages
Originally posted by Silent Master
Except, even if the Hulk did it(he didn't) it wouldn't prove that guys like Superman could...seeing as the Hulk's strength varies based on his anger.

If he did it then it would prove it since Superman is always stronger than all Hulk's except for WBH.

Originally posted by h1a8
If he did it then it would prove it since Superman is always stronger than all Hulk's except for WBH.

Like usual, you dont know what you are talking about.

Originally posted by h1a8
If he did it then it would prove it since Superman is always stronger than all Hulk's except for WBH.

IOW, no matter what feat the Hulk performs, Superman is still stronger...because he's Superman bro.

BTW, the Hulk didn't overcome the enchantment, nor was he proven worthy...the comic clearly shows/states that Mjolnir was merely returning to Thor's hand.

Originally posted by Silent Master
IOW, no matter what feat the Hulk performs, Superman is still stronger...because he's Superman bro.

BTW, the Hulk didn't overcome the enchantment, nor was he proven worthy...the comic clearly shows/states that Mjolnir was merely returning to Thor's hand.

Listen, I'm not stupid ok. I already agreed that Hulk didn't lift Mjolnir. Do you remember?

I said IF Hulk lifted it (he didn't) then it would prove it for Superman since Superman's strength feats are better than any of Hulk's (except WBH). But if Hulk gets a feat in the future that is beyond anything that Superman has ever done then I would agree with you.

Originally posted by h1a8
Listen, I'm not stupid ok. I already agreed that Hulk didn't lift Mjolnir. Do you remember?

I said [B]IF Hulk lifted it (he didn't) then it would prove it for Superman since Superman's strength feats are better than any of Hulk's (except WBH). But if Hulk gets a feat in the future that is beyond anything that Superman has ever done then I would agree with you. [/B]

What strength feats of Superman would be better than overcoming Mjolnir's enchantment?

Originally posted by Silent Master
What strength feats of Superman would be better than overcoming Mjolnir's enchantment?

Mageddon is one
But that's irrelevant since we are arguing that if Hulk does it then Superman can.

Originally posted by h1a8
Mageddon is one
But that's irrelevant since we are arguing that if Hulk does it then Superman can.

So, your stance is that Superman can overpower the enchantment on Mjolnir?

Originally posted by Silent Master
So, your stance is that Superman can overpower the enchantment on Mjolnir?

Only if a non WBH can do it

or

Only if we use Superman's highest feats as the one who would do the lifting.

So my stance is conditional.

Originally posted by h1a8
Only if a non WBH can do it

or

Only if we use Superman's highest feats as the one who would do the lifting.

So my stance is conditional.

IOW, if a non WBH did it, you'd lowball the feat.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Thor lifted the hammer because he was Worthy but he still struggled. That's my entire point.

It's proof that Hulk lifting Mjolnir but struggling in the beginning doesn't mean he overpowered the enchantment like you claimed it is.

Thor's struggle consisted of a dramatic moment, over in one panel, where he shouts who he is fighting for. To equate that with the Hulk scene makes you a legitimate moron. Well, it's not this particular standpoint that makes you a moron [you've always been one] but it certainly reaffirms it.

Hulk, who tried to lift it with one hand, then with both hands, then groaned, then slowly started lifting it until it's full on above his head is a scene depicting him overpowering something. Thus the effort. Thor, stressed out [Sif had dissappeared he was not worthy up until that point], rushing to the hammer and then one panel showing him in a close up shouting the names of the ones he wants to fight for is not equivalent to the Hulk scene.

Not only due to common sense, and blatant intention of the author [one wants to show, using multiple pages Hulk overpowering the hammer's enchantment, while the other is a quick dramatic moment because Thor had just received his worthiness], but also because it would imply that young Thor is much stronger than Hulk.

I know you're a Thorbag, but young Thor isn't that strong.

Hulk didn't overpower the enchantment.

Originally posted by Silent Master
IOW, if a non WBH did it, you'd lowball the feat.
saying superman could do it isn't lowballing. Superman, after all, has lifted infinite weight.
So I wouldn't lowball it.

IMO it takes less force than the weight of several planets to overpower the enchantment. Otherwise the durability would give first.

Originally posted by Philosophía
Thor's struggle consisted of a dramatic moment, over in one panel, where he shouts who he is fighting for. To equate that with the Hulk scene makes you a legitimate moron. Well, it's not this particular standpoint that makes you a moron [you've always been one] but it certainly reaffirms it.

Hulk, who tried to lift it with one hand, then with both hands, then groaned, then slowly started lifting it until it's full on above his head is a scene depicting him overpowering something. Thus the effort. Thor, stressed out [Sif had dissappeared he was not worthy up until that point], rushing to the hammer and then one panel showing him in a close up shouting the names of the ones he wants to fight for is not equivalent to the Hulk scene.

Not only due to common sense, and blatant intention of the author [one wants to show, using multiple pages Hulk overpowering the hammer's enchantment, while the other is a quick dramatic moment because Thor had just received his worthiness], but also because it would imply that young Thor is much stronger than Hulk.

I know you're a Thorbag, but young Thor isn't that strong.

exactly, it was obvious Hulk overpowered the mjolnir enhancements, however the thor trolls are trying to twist it and create chaos everytime someone brings that up.

Originally posted by h1a8
saying superman could do it isn't lowballing. Superman, after all, has lifted infinite weight.
So I wouldn't lowball it.

IMO it takes less force than the weight of several planets to overpower the enchantment. Otherwise the durability would give first.

You've already admitted that you'd lowball the feat if it was done by a Hulk other than WBH.

Originally posted by Philosophía
Thor's struggle consisted of a dramatic moment, over in one panel, where he shouts who he is fighting for. To equate that with the Hulk scene makes you a legitimate moron. Well, it's not this particular standpoint that makes you a moron [you've always been one] but it certainly reaffirms it.

Hulk, who tried to lift it with one hand, then with both hands, then groaned, then slowly started lifting it until it's full on above his head is a scene depicting him overpowering something. Thus the effort. Thor, stressed out [Sif had dissappeared he was not worthy up until that point], rushing to the hammer and then one panel showing him in a close up shouting the names of the ones he wants to fight for is not equivalent to the Hulk scene.

Not only due to common sense, and blatant intention of the author [one wants to show, using multiple pages Hulk overpowering the hammer's enchantment, while the other is a quick dramatic moment because Thor had just received his worthiness], but also because it would imply that young Thor is much stronger than Hulk.

I know you're a Thorbag, but young Thor isn't that strong.

What in the hell are you babbling about?
Originally posted by wolverinos
exactly, it was obvious Hulk overpowered the mjolnir enhancements, however the thor trolls are trying to twist it and create chaos everytime someone brings that up.
First of all, that isn't what he is saying. At all. If it were, he'd be a complete moron. Second, that isn't the first time the creators of a comic pulled the ole bait-and-switch on someone supposedly lifting Mjolnir. Third, how many times do you need the scans to be posted and to be told to shut up by mods before doing so?

Originally posted by ODG
What in the hell are you babbling about?
If you can't follow what's being discussed, go back in your bench.

Originally posted by Philosophía
If you can't follow what's being discussed, go back in your bench.
I can't follow what's being discussed because your rant makes no sense.

And I'm not the first to point it out.

Originally posted by ODG
I can't follow what's being discussed

Back you go.

Originally posted by Philosophía
http://2.imimg.com/data2/PB/WN/MY-1584463/school-bench-model-ue-08-250x250.jpg

Back you go.

Well it seems you have retained the ability to communicate an idea via simple English. Even with pictures that aren't obnoxiously oversized and page-breaking.

So try it again with your incoherent babblespeak you sh1tted this thread up with.

I'll even give you the rest of the day to collect your scattered thoughts.

You seem to be mad about something.

Is your anus itching, again? I don't recommend sitting in the bench then.

You can try and figure out what's happening while standing up 👆