Re: Deathsaurer v.s. Iron Man
Originally posted by Wei Phoenix
Yeah he said that, but has Hiltz ever met anything as advanced as Stark's armor? Anyone as smart as Stark? Tony's technology shits on theirs because he's in a more advanced time period, he's got money and he's smarter than most if not all characters in the show. So you're saying that it's impossible for a techonlogically advanced character to manipulate or even shut down and damage the deathsaurer?
And how does Tony's technology shit on the Deathsaurer's?Has Ironman produced an armor capable of tanking a gravity effect like that of a black hole.The Deathsaurer's armor is a combination of its and Deathstinger's armor btw.If its capable of tanking a gravity shell, the density of the armor might be equal to uru or adamantine.Only the Genobreaker enhanced by an Organoid was able to penetrate its shield and armor while firing a charge particle on the Blade liger(with its shield and Blades protecting it from the charge particle.And Tony might hack the Deathsaurer if he had prep.But again, the stips of this thread are against your argument.
Originally posted by Wei Phoenix
He's as good as dead while they're a mile apart? Tony would have logistics on the zoids inner workings in no time flat. He moves way faster than the Deathsaurer. This is from someone who hates Iron Man, and everything about Tony Stark but loves Guardian Force and Chaotic Century.
And how does Ironman counter the Deathsaurers Zoid absorbing thingy?Not to mention Deathsaurer also has those fragmentation spike for defense and offense.And we go back to what the topic starter's stipulations.
Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Current comic Iron Man v.s. Deathsaurer zoid. Goes down in London, because why not. No foreknowledge, no prep, it's pissing rain and they're a mile apart.
The no foreknowledge no prep negates your statement.Otherwise, I would agree with you Tony would have logistics on the Deathsaurers.And could possibly win.