Freedon Nadd Vs Darth Sidious

Started by mikemikeer3 pages

About 1% of what you just typed is actually relevant.

lmao

Of course. Unless he sends a message across the galaxy, then most of it's irrelevant.

Another great point from you mikequeer. You must be tired of ripping these arguments to shreds?

I'm sorry, you're right. Darth Sidious was a "master swordsman". Therefore he wins. Rofl. It's unlikely anybody has to try against you at any point.

Yeah, because being a master swordsman in a vs debate means nothing, but sending a message across the galaxy, well that'll definitely mean something in a fight.

You're too good. Keep 'em coming, we're all learning so much from you.

Yeah, because being a master swordsman in a vs debate means nothing

Yup, that's exactly what I said, instead of the obvious of "being a master swordsman doesn't guarantee victory over anyone at any point". I realize you're having trouble with common sense but come on, this is almost comical.

lol, what has nadd done that puts him even close to sidious? You shitily defend your favorite ancient sith, though sidious is canonically stronger than all of em.

Nothing. He's as much of an unknown as we have in the mythos. Only Ragnos is more unknown.

Originally posted by mikemikeer
About 1% of what you just typed is actually relevant.

this lead me to believe you were defending nadd, although everything typed about sidious is relevant, canonical statements, feats, etc.

1% was actually relevant to a fight. That includes feats and statements.

Originally posted by mikemikeer
Yup, that's exactly what I said, instead of the obvious of "being a master swordsman doesn't guarantee victory over anyone at any point". I realize you're having trouble with common sense but come on, this is almost comical.

It doesn't guarantee anything, but it IS more directly relevant.

I don't recall saying Krayt would win a fight because he can reach every sith with the force, but desperation breeds lies.

I think you're both misrepresenting the other for comedic purposes and out of a sense of deep, mutual hatred.

And I am pleased by it.

Originally posted by mikemikeer
About 1% of what you just typed is actually relevant.

It states flat out THREE times hes the best, and the others further support the factual claims:
"Obi Wan Kenobi and Yoda were the only Jedi left in a position to do something about the disaster. Yoda went after Palpatine in the empty Senate chamber, but could not defeat the most powerful Sith Lord in history."
-From The New Essential Chronology

"Vader imagined the power that could be his if he crushed Palpatine and established his own rule over the Empire. But first, he would need his own apprentice. By himself, he could not hope to defeat the most powerful Sith Lord the galaxy had ever known ."
-Vader: The Ultimate Guide

"Beyond the vision of the Jedi Knights, somewhere within the darkness, the greatest master of evil ever to use Sith power bides his time. As his strength grows, his plans begin to shape the course of the galaxy, and his snares await the unsuspecting."
-The Complete Visual Dictionary

Originally posted by The_Tempest
I think you're both misrepresenting the other for comedic purposes and out of a sense of deep, mutual hatred.

And I am pleased by it.

I think you're exaggerating the level of awesome because of your unconditional love and sexual attraction.

I think you are projecting your emotions onto me. I'll be projecting my semen onto your face.

Pretending I'm Sidious again?

lol, good one

Originally posted by mikemikeer
Pretending I'm Sidious again?

The physical resemblance is deceptive....

Originally posted by mikemikeer
Pretending I'm Sidious again?
Originally posted by mikemikeer
Pretending I'm Sidious again?

You're mentally defective, but gotta admit, that was a good one.