Jesus names as evil those who think his Father would break heavenly law and have him

Jesus names as evil those who think his Father would break heavenly law and have him sacrificed.

The law in heaven is that the oldest dies first if there is to be a death. That is the only proper law for Gods, --- if they could die that is.

As above so below.

If we interpret that law and apply it to a human family, then the first to die would be fathers, followed by wives and lastly, children. Fathers are to die before sons. That is God’s law.

As above so below then would indicate that the law of the sea should also be the law of the land. It says that women and children are saved first then the men.

Men would need to recognize their duty to sanctify the family by placing women and children above themselves. IOW, equality does not exist in heaven nor should it exist in our human law.

Knowing this, God would never have his son sacrifice for a ransom that God himself would have had to set. One does not put a bounty on a son’s head.

I am not an atheist but Satan and Christians want atheists to embrace barbaric human sacrifice and the notion that we should profit from punishing the innocent instead of the guilty. Christian preach for Satan. Shame on Christians for their immoral dogma and tradition of embracing blood sacrifice.

In reality, if God did demand such a barbaric sacrifice, he would be sinning. He would know that barbaric human sacrifice is immoral.

You do as well. Right?

Those with good morals will know that no noble and gracious God would demand the sacrifice of a so called son just to prove it's benevolence nor would God break heavenly law.

If you are a believer in the vile notion of the human sacrifice of Jesus Christ, when you die, Satan will ask you; how was your ticket to heaven purchased?
With innocent blood?

If you say yes and point to you scapegoat Jesus, you become Satan’s.

Have you embraced human sacrifice and do you plan to try to ride your scapegoat Jesus into heaven, --- on your way to hell?

Regards
DL

Yeah but...What about the Kangaroos?

This is like, fanfiction, kind of wonder if you thought it was clever wordplay when you posted it.

This isn't Greek Mythology.

Besides, God needed a human form just for the Throne of Heaven, his form would be incomprehensible without Jesus.

Originally posted by Dolos
This isn't Greek Mythology.

Besides, God needed a human form just for the Throne of Heaven, his form would be incomprehensible without Jesus.

If the God you know is as described in scriptures, then we can all comprehend that he looks more like a prick than a human.

Regards
DL

Originally posted by Bentley
This is like, fanfiction, kind of wonder if you thought it was clever wordplay when you posted it.

No. My thoughts at the time were more like disgust for a vile son murdering God.

Regards
DL

I don't understand your disgust to be honest. You'd need to believe the christian God exists to be disgusted by it, otherwise there would be no need for such strong feelings. So I assume you'd describe yourself as Christian.

Originally posted by Bentley
I don't understand your disgust to be honest. You'd need to believe the christian God exists to be disgusted by it, otherwise there would be no need for such strong feelings. So I assume you'd describe yourself as Christian.

Hell no. I have pride.

The Godhead I know in a nutshell.
I was a skeptic till the age of 39.
I then had an apotheosis and later branded myself an esoteric ecumenist and Gnostic Christian. Gnostic Christian because I exemplify this quote from William Blake.

“Both read the Bible day and night, But thou read'st black where I read white.”

This refers to how Gnostics tend to reverse, for moral reasons, what Christians see in the Bible. We tend to recognize the evil ways of O T God where literal Christians will see God’s killing as good. Christians are sheep where Gnostic Christians are goats.
This is perhaps why we see the use of a Jesus scapegoat as immoral, while theists like to make Jesus their beast of burden. An immoral position.

During my apotheosis, something that only lasted 5 or 6 seconds, the only things of note to happen was that my paradigm of reality was confirmed and I was chastised to think more demographically. What I found was what I call a cosmic consciousness. Not a new term but one that is a close but not exact fit.

I recognize that I have no proof. That is always the way with apotheosis.
This is also why I prefer to stick to issues of morality because no one has yet been able to prove that God is real and I have no more proof than they for the cosmic consciousness.

The cosmic consciousness is not a miracle working God. He does not interfere with us save when one of us finds it. Not a common thing from what I can see. It is a part of nature and our next evolutionary step.

I tend to have more in common with atheists who ignore what they see as my delusion because our morals are basically identical. Theist tend not to like me much as I have no respect for literalists and fundamentals and think that most Christians have tribal mentalities and poor morals.

I am rather between a rock and a hard place but this I cannot help.

I am happy to be questioned on what I believe but whether or not God exists is basically irrelevant to this world for all that he does not do, and I prefer to thrash out moral issues that can actually find an end point. The search for God is never ending when you are of the Gnostic persuasion. My apotheosis basically says that I am to discard whatever God I found, God as a set of rules that is, not idol worship it but instead, raise my bar and seek further.

My apotheosis also showed me that God has no need for love, adoration or obedience. He has no needs. Man has dominion here on earth and is to be and is the supreme being.

Regards
DL

Again, feeling disgust about a non-existent God makes you more attached to that idea of God than most atheists or lazy christians for that matter. If you were actually antagonizing christians for the kicks, I'd get the point of your argumentation, but if you're actually describing your personal relationship with the concept of God, I think it's a bit of a waste of energy in intellect (not chatising you about it, it is you, afterall, the one that gives meaning to your actions, I'm just trying to wrap my head around your gesture).

Originally posted by Bentley
Again, feeling disgust about a non-existent God makes you more attached to that idea of God than most atheists or lazy christians for that matter. If you were actually antagonizing christians for the kicks, I'd get the point of your argumentation, but if you're actually describing your personal relationship with the concept of God, I think it's a bit of a waste of energy in intellect (not chatising you about it, it is you, afterall, the one that gives meaning to your actions, I'm just trying to wrap my head around your gesture).

My bad. I read too quickly and did a knee jerk to your last.

Here is an answer to your whole question.

It is my view that all literalists and fundamentals hurt all of us who are moral religionists as well as those who do not believe. They all hurt their parent religions and everyone else who has a belief or not. They make us all into laughing stocks and should rethink their position. There is a Godhead but not the God of talking animals, genocidal floods and retribution. Beliefs in fantasy, miracles and magic are evil.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HKHaClUCw4&feature=PlayList&p=5123864A5243470E&index=0&playnext=1

They also do much harm to their own.

African witches and Jesus
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MlRG9gXriVI&feature=related

Jesus Camp 1of 9
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=48b_1185215493

Death to Gays.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMw2Zg_BVzw&feature=related

For evil to grow my friends, all good people need do is nothing.
Fight them when you can. It is your duty to our fellow man.

Regards
DL

there is a certain hubris to a person who makes sweeping statements about Christianity then posts Jesus Camp as proof.