Darth Zannah vs Obi Wan Kenobi

Started by XRKun4 pages

Darth Zannah vs Obi Wan Kenobi

Saber
Force
All Out:

I'm going with Kenobi in all 3. Better mastery of Soresu, proficiency in Ataru and Jar'Kai, and training in Shii-Cho, Niman, Shien, and Tae-Jitsu.
His force powers include Tutaminis (against a flamethrower, noted to be very hard to block against with the Force), Repulse, a very powerful Push, and Crush, as well as basic Force Speed and Strength.

I'm leaning towards Kenobi too, but a lot depends on the setting. If this is a DS world similar to Ambria, Zannah takes it due to ungodly tendrils.

Other that that, I think:

Sabers; Kenobi, handily
Force: Zannah, possibly
All-out: Kenobi 6-7/10

Zannah stomp.

lolno

I'm sorry.

Kenobi wins sabers.

Zannah should take force.

Not sure who would take all out.

Kenobi. He's a better lightsaber duelist, in the force it's somewhat close, as Kenobi utilizes the basic force abilities far more often than zannah does, while Zannah uses sith sorcery, though the only one that would truly cause harm (other than tendrils) is the fear spell, which I don't think will work on kenobi. to be fair, i'll give Zannah edge here. Overall, gotta give it to Kenobi, as zannah isn't very effective at mounting a lightsaber offensive, while kenobi is perfectly capable of doing so.

I'm not seeing how Kenobi is better than Zannah in lightsabers considering how well she did against Bane, who's better than anyone Kenobi's fought. Plus he has no chance of penetrating her defense nor her his so lightsabers are useless.

Also he apparently gets tired in 10 seconds so she'll easily wear him out. 😆

um, zannah woulda been slaughtered by bane, were it not for one-off tendrils. lol, and Zannah has a chance of penetrating through kenobi's defenses? 🙄

Originally posted by ares834
Kenobi wins sabers.

Zannah should take force.

Not sure who would take all out.

Obi-Wan. He's on par with Maul, who's more skilled and powerful than either Zannah or Bane.

Lol. I still can't believe you actually believe that.

yeah I don't believe Maul is overall more powerful than Bane, most likely a better duelist though.

Originally posted by XSUPREMEXSKILLZ
yeah I don't believe Maul is overall more powerful than Bane, most likely a better duelist though.

I believe he's both. Though Bane may have an edge in terms of sheer Force knowledge. And I'd probably give him the nod if he has his orbalisks. But in terms of natural ability, Maul's definitely better.

Nah. Bane has shown comparable TK, and has shown an affinity, even a mastery, over force lightning.

Why definitely?

Originally posted by XSUPREMEXSKILLZ
Nah. Bane has shown comparable TK, and has shown an affinity, even a mastery, over force lightning.

Mighella the Nightsister has shown that Force lightning isn't necessarily a decisive weapon against Maul, who may actually possess the ability (The Ultimate Visual Guide does credit him with "far greater" dark side knowledge than she).

The Phantom Menace Scrapbook makes it clear that the powers of the Sith advanced over the years in accordance with Bane's own edict. And Maul's been constantly referred to as one of the most skilled and dangerous Sith of all time.

Seems pretty obvious to me.

Yeah, because tanking some random Nightsisters lightning means he can tank lightning powerful enough to disintegrate people. That sounds right durrr. 9_6

Maul never reached the point where he advanced passed Sidious so that quote is useless.

Also ignoring me only makes me harder. You can't ignore my girth.

Nah, people take the master-apprentice thing way too deeply. The apprentice is usually barely weaker, if not on-par, with the master, like revan/malak, vindican/ malgus, bane/zannah, etc. How exactly is Mighella comparable to bane in terms of lightning?

Kenobi takes sabers, no doubt.

Zannah takes force, easy.

All-Out could go ether way. Honestly not sure.

I can guarantee that Zannah does not take force easily, might barely even win in that dept.