Khan (Into Darkness) vs. Link (TP)

Started by quanchi11220 pages

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
No, that's text and your opinion. Provide proof Khan can successfully shoot Link before receiving an arrow through the brain.
Lasers travel faster than arrows. Guns fire quicker than bows. This is getting hilarious.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Lasers travel faster than arrows. Guns fire quicker than bows. This is getting hilarious.
Again I see no proof, I just see you saying words that mean nothing without evidence to support them.

Khan's speed of thought is not proven.
Khan's aim is not proven.
The speed of his projectiles is not proven.
The nature of his projectiles is not proven.
The power of his weapon is not proven.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Shooting him, Drew. Do you always ask questions You already have the answers to ?

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Again I see no proof, I just see you saying words that mean nothing without evidence to support them.

Khan's speed of thought is not proven.
Khan's aim is not proven.
The speed of his projectiles is not proven.
The nature of his projectiles is not proven.
The power of his weapon is not proven.

Watch the scene in which he aims and downs multiple foes all attacking him at once. Lasers and guns are faster the bows and arrows. Modern technology is greater than medieval weaponry.

More useless words from you, Quan. No proof? So you can't actually support Khan winning?

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
More useless words from you, Quan. No proof? So you can't actually support Khan winning?
Not my fault you have not seen the film. Go rent it.

It is your fault that you are not proving your claim. Go get proof.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
It is your fault that you are not proving your claim. Go get proof.
I don't have to post links to educate the ignorant. Khan wins based off his decimation of the Klingons. Boom. Dead link.

It's your duty to support your argument. As it stands you have nothing but baseless claims. Shame how that does you no good.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
It's your duty to support your argument. As it stands you have nothing but baseless claims. Shame how that does you no good.
I supported my argument with facts. Not my fault you did not see the film.

All I see is your opinion. That's worth nothing to me, or anyone else who wants to seriously discuss something.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
All I see is your opinion. That's worth nothing to me, or anyone else who wants to seriously discuss something.
You don't know enough on your own which is the problem. That's the issue. Ignorance.

Originally posted by The Scenario

All inferior to the über gun.

No, the problem is that you're wasting time typing things that prove nothing, out of a misplaced hatred for Zelda you got as the result of a serious jimmy rustling something like two years ago now.

The fact you're still assmad about this is kind of adorable. But yeah, prove your points so I can form a proper rebuttle or retract them and continue to throw around nonsense. I don't really care which.

Originally posted by quanchi112
All inferior to the über gun.

Gun gets dodged, Khan gets an arrow in the eye.

Do you have any evidence?

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
No, the problem is that you're wasting time typing things that prove nothing, out of a misplaced hatred for Zelda you got as the result of a serious jimmy rustling something like two years ago now.

The fact you're still assmad about this is kind of adorable. But yeah, prove your points so I can form a proper rebuttle or retract them and continue to throw around nonsense. I don't really care which.

Another breakdown.

Khan shoots him down based off the Klingon feats.

Originally posted by The Scenario
Gun gets dodged, Khan gets an arrow in the eye.

Do you have any evidence?

Link isn't fast enough to dodge repeated shots. Faster than anything he's faced in Tp.

More nonsense it is, then.

Prove it.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
More nonsense it is, then.

Prove it.

Watch the movie.

Concession accepted.