Ok. Now we're getting somewhere.
1. Neme can make a case when he really wants to, but he usually just trolls the shit out of people hilariously. Scream is more inclined to making legitimate debate efforts, and generally provides a more in-depth analysis from what I can tell. He's not always tactful about his take on a subject thought, which MAY sometimes remove a point of credibility and reason, but we've all been there. I would be more easily able to judge this if I actually saw exchanges between them. I guess it could go either way. Idk.
2. Scream's alcoholic numbness durability and hockeynaught rage tenacity FTW.
I'm a lot bigger and stronger than ScreamPaste.
I am something like two or three inches taller, and about eighty pounds heavier, and have been working in a physically demanding job for the past year and a half. I also wrestled in high school (Until the back injury I am about to talk about) and was bench-pressing 350 in senior year, and IMO I am probably stronger now. That said, I also have had a back problem for the past six years that hinders how agile I am on my feet and of course if hit could honestly end the fight right there (Though why would my back be to him?).
Good thing you made it "no morals", I already have very very few. Max plays at sociopathy, but he falls short of the genuine article.
The debating round is something only a narcissist would address.
Originally posted by NemeBroNah, not really. ScreamPaste has durability feats on his side, but the statement about his skull striking fear into the fists of men, while from a canon source, is likely hyperbole, fun to troll with but it's impossible to quantify a fist's ability to feel terror.
You did that though.