Originally posted by Raisen
holy sh1t dolos. wtf are you talking about? you used to seem like a good dude but lately you've really been writing some crazy stuff.
Not crazy or insane, super-sane.
what is your knowledge of the freemasons? illuminati? etc........you do know that there are freemasons everywhere right? normal people with normal careers are freemasons.
I Never said that.
There's no reason to assume that Freemasons like George Washington knew about them, or that one needs to be aware of there existence in order to act on their behalf - what with this monstrous new technological capacity to monitor and micromanage!
Modern religion is a cover up of something, it opposes the Freemasons and the Illuminati. I stated the Freemasons and the Illuminati as the antithesis to how any real super-society would present itself to the public. In fact, religion is exactly the sort of doctrine that would be preached:
[list]1) Why not poison the denizens of Rome, or
2) dramatically reduce the entire human population to something manageable via kamikaze delivery of rats afflicted with the bubonic?
* The reason for the dark ages may have been as simple as reducing the number of bloodlines so that the individual composing the population could be more easily accounted for, allowing for precision social engineering and genetic breeding programs designed in the guise of 'royal weddings'.
4)After recovering from the Dark Ages, why not begin a process that would end up replacing precious metal currencies with paper currencies during the Renaissance? [/list]
Millenniums of precision social engineering. The symbolism is now everywhere.
The fact is that the what is now considered the "civilized status quo" is actually just a form of social interaction that makes the masses easy to control, at our expense might I add.
The Pharoahs of Old would have noticed how difficult it would have been to control populations when the 'pagan'/'tribal' social interactions, in which humanity is evolved to function best in, would have been disastrous for Centralized Imperial Oppression and Control.
Yet Alexander the Great managed to emulate that tribal aspect and whilst maintaining a centralized monarchy capable of uniting many peoples to enjoy the pleasures of a Freudian, inclusive anarchical paganism without ethnic, gender, or social sectarianism - where practices or beliefs regarding philosophical, ideological, religious or sexual practice are free to be had. Education is encouraged and offered to all. This is sort of an Masonic Cult except ruled by a visionary like Alexander the Great, and without in-fighting for control or unequal access to resources.
When Achilles (bisexual, exhibitionist, incestuous, necrophiliac, "handsomest of all Greeks", possessing high intellectual ability in both his acumen and knowledge pertaining to military affairs) came along, followed by Alexander of Macedonia, all the way down to the later years of Rome, no one was afraid to be themselves, the protagonists of the Heroic Age defied death on the battlefield and brought courage to the men, and everyone seemed to be content in their social roles; women, men, and Ἑρμαφρόδιτος.
Then a certain religion which I dare not say came along ushering in an endless maze of dangerously oppressive doctrines, like social repression and emotional servitude. That religion is based on pure fiction, with less archeological backing for material events than the assault on Troy for tin or on the events that compose Alexander's life. Individuals have grown far beyond any religion, and Alexander's doctrines are still relevant, but his methods need to be updated to conquer and wage war on a different substrate, so to speak. Science is now every bit as relevant as revolution.