Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
This.Despite being absolutely ridiculously powerful, being a Skyfather gives him a huge versatility edge to fall back on.
But yea, he turns them all to ash like Desak.
WBH tanked an attack superior to any attack King Thor has shown in that arc. King Thor wasn't shown to have the durability (through feats) to withstand an attack on the magnitude of which WBH can deliver. Thus he would fall short here. Now if you disagree then provide evidence to the contrary.
Lastly, I disagree with the notion that Superman won't bother King Thor or would be easily touchable. Superman would not only rock the hell out of King Thor but he would be nigh untouchable. This isn't a comic fight. Thor would be bombared by two fast guys and one very powerful guy at the same time.
Originally posted by quanchi112If I didn't read the arc then I would have never said, King Thor had no feats on the magnitude of WBH (in both durability and attack). I choose to go on what is shown vs. implied power. Going by only what he has shown then he falls short here.
You did not read the arc.