Titanic Gospel: There's Only Two

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Why? What can I do to help?

This is your original post:

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Why can't they all be right? I think they are all right, and all wrong.

I simply want to know what you mean by "right" in the above context so that we can enter into a discussion.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
This is your original post:

I simply want to know what you mean by "right" in the above context so that we can enter into a discussion.

Right as in correct. But I already told you this.

All religions are right (correct) and wrong (not correct) at the same time.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
All religions are right (correct) and wrong (not correct) at the same time.

You have created a contradiction.

Something cannot be two distinct things at the same time.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
You have created a contradiction.

Something cannot be two distinct things at the same time.

What do you see?

You can't argue relativism with an evangelical fundamentalist.

You can't argue period, which is why JIA completely avoiding replying to me.

We all know munson is a fundamental anti spiritual troll who lives on his computer.. arguing with him about God is equivalent to trying to explain calculus to Siri, she just wont get it

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
What do you see?

An illusion i.e. distorted reality.

But we are talking about "states" or "religion" not images.

Besides, something cannot be both in and out, up and down, on and off, a "1" and a "0", true and false--simultaneously, just ask any real scientist.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
An illusion i.e. distorted reality.

But we are talking about religion not images.

Besides, something cannot be both in and out, up and down, on and off, a "1" and a "0", true and false.

Why don't you answer my question? I can't explain if you don't follow. What do you see? Just tell me as simply as you can.

How do you explain faith over the internet or how do you explain what a lotus smells like to someone who has never touched one?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Why don't you answer my question? I can't explain if you don't follow. What do you see? Just tell me as simply as you can.

I see an image of two different things within the same context, but again that is an image not a state, condition, or reality.

That is an illusion i.e. a distortion of reality--not reality.

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
You can't argue relativism with an evangelical fundamentalist.

You can't argue period, which is why JIA completely avoiding replying to me.

Exactly, because I am not here to argue.

I am here to speak the Truth in love.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
I see an image of two different things within the same context, but again that is an image not a state, condition, or reality.

That is an illusion i.e. a distortion of reality--not reality.

No, what you see is colored pixies on your computer screen. You have an image of what your religion is in your mind, but it is just an image in your mind. You cannot ever experience true reality.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
No, what you see is colored pixies on your computer screen. You have an image of what your religion is in your mind, but it is just an image in your mind. You cannot ever experience true reality.

How do you explain faith over the internet or how do you explain what a lotus smells like to someone who has never touched one?

Dodging this only shows your ineptness

Originally posted by Supra
How do you explain faith over the internet or how do you explain what a lotus smells like to someone who has never touched one?

Dodging this only shows your ineptness

Faith? You give a definition. I don't know what a Lotus smells like, I've never smelled one.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Faith? You give a definition. I don't know what a Lotus smells like, I've never smelled one.

Yet you put on in your signature and make me look at it every time you post...this proves your a fraud

Originally posted by Supra
Yet you put on in your signature and make me look at it every time you post...this proves your a fraud

It is symbolism. The Lotus is a symbol of the oneness of cause and effect.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Exactly, because I am not here to argue.

I am here to speak the Truth in love.

No, you're here to push your beliefs without consideration to anything but those beliefs. This isn't a Christian forum, sub-forum, or even Christian-only thread. You are attempting to convert people on the premise that currently they are worthy of hell over heaven.

"Do as I do and you won't suffer for all eternity" is not a statement of love.

You really should go back and challenge yourself to answer my questions. If you base your entire existence on KMC around not accepting new data, you're only going to draw fire from less narrow-minded people.

Also, the image is similar because it changes meaning based on subjective perception. Since subjectivity is always up to the beholder, it applies to everything. Destroying a tree can be good or bad depending on the beholder.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
It is symbolism. The Lotus is a symbol of the oneness of cause and effect.

Yet you have never seen one in real life yet you claim its the symbol of oneness...

Yet you dare tell us because we have not seen God in person he does not exist..

Thats called hypocrisy

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
No, you're here to push your beliefs without consideration to anything but those beliefs. This isn't a Christian forum, sub-forum, or even Christian-only thread. You are attempting to convert people on the premise that currently they are worthy of hell over heaven.

"Do as I do and you won't suffer for all eternity" is not a statement of love.

You really should go back and challenge yourself to answer my questions. If you base your entire existence on KMC around not accepting new data, you're only going to draw fire from less narrow-minded people.

Also, the image is similar because it changes meaning based on subjective perception. Since subjectivity is always up to the beholder, it applies to everything. Destroying a tree can be good or bad depending on the beholder.

The only thing he's pushing is your buttons you have full freedom to respond or not to..the fact that you are responding tells us all you are looking for something..