Originally posted by SquallX
I respect your point, but highly disagrees on the predator thing.A teacher, like a parent is meant to nurture, elevate, teach, and to overall prepare those under them-no pun intended-for the future. Not to seduce them.
Take a look at the first case. He was 13. At 13, I was "all the way grown up and shaving." For all intents and purposes I was a man. A full grown man. Intellectually and physically. In other cultures, you're considered a man when you're 13 or 11.
But in America, in our absurdly puritan country where we are super scared of "sex" and try to sanitize all children from it, a 13 year old male is "just a kid" and "just a boy."
I know you remember how you were when you were 13. At 13, I was trying to seduce college girls. It was all about trying to get into the pants of any attractive girl in sight.
Take a look at the photo of the teacher: she's probably a smoke-wagon to any 13 year old.
And then read the story. Despite the fact that the news site presents a bias perspective, there's not really any "sexual predator" practices.
I just cannot view this person as a sexual predator.
Did she threaten to give him bad grades if he didn't let her give him a BJ? No?
Okay...did she stalk him? No?
Did she lavish him with gifts and ask for sexual favors in return? No?
Did she emotional abuse him into getting a BJ (such as crying that she is super insecure and thinks she's ugly)? No?
Okay...so where is the "sexual predator" practices you usually see in sexual predator cases? I don't see it. I see two sexually mature humans doing sexual things. Dude...let's get real...he blew a load in her mouth while in her car. He's horny. She's hot. Nature took its proper course.
They swapped nudes, talked sex over messages, etc. Nothing to see here. She should be banned from teaching, probably. Just can't see labeling her a 'sexual predator' as legit, though.