Dr Manhattan vs Kryptonians

Started by marwash224 pages

To deny that Manhattan can dismantle the kryptonians is to deny the in-world mechanics of the movie the character comes from... it's the same thing people love to do in Neo threads.

Manhattan blows people up by removing their intrinsic field (the thing that holds matter together)... it has nothing to do with telekinetically ripping them apart, so a character's durability is irrelevant.

If you wanna ignore facts, that's on you.

Originally posted by Supra
Whats more powerful the singularity pull being shown on Man Of Steel and the gravity beam in which he both resisted and overcame or DM control on matter?

Those were feats of strength, dude.

Show me one instance where Superman points at somebody and makes them explode like a Hot Pocket in a microwave.

Control over matter > Raw Kryptonian speed and strength.

"You could've turned the gun into steam, the bullets into mercury, the bottle into goddamned snowflakes!"

^Matter manipulation

"I've walked across the sun. I’ve seen events so tiny and so fast they hardly can be said to have occurred at all."

^Durability and perception of time/reaction speed.

Manhattan can perceive his own future, and that gives him all the edge he needs.

The good Doctor wins.

Damn yeah whenever I think of DM I just think of Matter manipulation, but I totally forget how fast his perceptions are and the fact that he sees into the future.

He can also multiply himself and multi task. However so Kryptonian numbers won't even be an advantage. DM was basically invincible.

He seems immortal. As in it doesn't really matter what you can do to him he will just reform, if you get to do anything in the first place.

Is this actually a joke thread?

Originally posted by marwash22
To deny that Manhattan can dismantle the kryptonians is to deny the in-world mechanics of the movie the character comes from... it's the same thing people love to do in Neo threads.

Manhattan blows people up by removing their intrinsic field (the thing that holds matter together)... it has nothing to do with telekinetically ripping them apart, so a character's durability is irrelevant.

If you wanna ignore facts, that's on you.

So DM wins or loses?

Wins. Utterly.

Originally posted by Impediment
Wins. Utterly.

Fair enough, DM wins

Originally posted by NemeBro
Kryptonians as we can see can take planetary terraforming blasts of coolness to the face without being injured.

Neither party can do anything to the other, assuming Zod at least is as durable as Superman.

The ignorance of this post offends me. You literally make stuff up and have the comprehension skills of a five year old.

Your mother's a fat whore who is beaten by her pimp daily because no man is desperate enough to lay with that ugly beast.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Your mother's a fat whore who is beaten by her pimp daily because no man is desperate enough to lay with that ugly beast.
So you avoid the actual discussion because clearly intelligence isn't your strong suit.

You didn't make an actual point though, there was nothing to discuss.

Why is your mom an obese sow that spreads her legs to whatever passes by quanchi?

Originally posted by NemeBro
You didn't make an actual point though, there was nothing to discuss.

Why is your mom an obese sow that spreads her legs to whatever passes by quanchi?

You clearly hyped words you didn't even understand the definition of and were mocked the entire thread. I can't recall a more embarrassing debate. Awful.

So you still have nothing to add to the discussion?

No, embarrassing is you still refusing to battlezone me and losing the one battlezone you had in All Versus .

Originally posted by NemeBro
So you still have nothing to add to the discussion?

No, embarrassing is you still refusing to battlezone me and losing the one battlezone you had in All Versus .

Do you concede that Manhattan wins ?

I was ten percent superior to scenario. Seeing you debate it would be a waste of my time. You're awful.

Scenario was twenty per cent cooler though.

Originally posted by Nephthys
Scenario was twenty per cent cooler though.
Do not be ridiculous.

Impossible.

Originally posted by Nephthys
Impossible.
Arguing with the King is treason.

As an Englishman, I only recognize a certain Queen's authority. Now back off before I go all french revolution on your candy ass.