Thor vs Bane

I think he punched a hole in solid concrete, and Thor has never shown to be able to do that.

But tbh I haven't seen Thor in a while.

Originally posted by NemeBro
I think he punched a hole in solid concrete, and Thor has never shown to be able to do that.

But tbh I haven't seen Thor in a while.

But he was punching Batman at the same time...I think that showing was just for show as it rendered little damage to Batman in that fight and in fact he missed those punches. So who knows on that one.

I don't think the column was solid concrete.

Might not have been, only saw the flick once.

Originally posted by Supra
But he was punching Batman at the same time...I think that showing was just for show as it rendered little damage to Batman in that fight and in fact he missed those punches. So who knows on that one.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Might not have been, only saw the flick once.

Batman is wearing full body armour.

True but does that stop all injury from a bunch?

There was actually a debate about it in the Bane vs Spock thread.

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=586385&pagenumber=1

Originally posted by NemeBro
Then by all means provide any evidence of this fact. If you can't, just step out of the thread like a good little boy and let the adults talk.

Fat has larger volume than muscle mass per the same weight. Hardy had at least 17-20% body fat while Hemsworth was at about 8%, and he was still much bigger than Hardy. He also has at least 6 inches on him which is a lot. Especially when you factor in the square-cube law. Your average skinnyfat 6'4 dude who doesn't lift can easily weigh 200 lbs. Someone with Chris Hemsworth's physique can't be any less than 225. Like I said I'm 5'11 and 180 lbs and I look bigger than Bane did. He was no where near 200 lbs. Hell, Christian Bale was bigger than him.

Hemsworth said he weighed 215 pounds during Thor. Not sure why actor weights/heights matter through as they often make them look bigger or smaller in a film.

Originally posted by Silent Master
IOW, human Thor was ripped...Bane was a fata$$.

If by "fata$$" you mean physique of a boxer, sure.

👆

Originally posted by ares834
If by "fata$$" you mean physique of a boxer, sure.

👆

Yea...Butterbean 👆

Originally posted by Silent Master
Yea...Butterbean 👆

👆

Butterbean would kick Thor's ass.

Originally posted by ares834
👆

Butterbean would kick Thor's ass.

What feats does Butterbean have that compare with beating several of the most highly trained people in the world so badly that he makes them look like chumps?

Originally posted by ares834
If by "fata$$" you mean physique of a boxer, sure.

👆

lol no. Check out Mike Tyson or Vladimir Klichko. Those are physiques of boxers. Hardy obviously failed a cycle and ended up looking like shit. He looked better even in Bronson.

Hardy was trying to bulk up as much as possible for the Bane role and still cam away with a pretty good physique.

Either way Thor's best combat feat was taking on and managing to take down a bunch of shield agents managing to get to the hammer.

He failed, he got the kind of body you get from eating like shit and working out for a few months. Only his traps were good. That and his height made him a joke. My theater burst into laughter whenever he was on screen. It's not entirely his fault though, he was miscast from the start.

Bane took out a retired, out of shape Batman. Plus he has a pretty big wekaness.

I... I don't even... Bane was buff, although not necessarily defined. Nor did he ever appear short in the movie. He looked huge and bulky, like a guy who beats the shit out of people rather than just someone who lifts weights all day.

Originally posted by Psychotron
He failed, he got the kind of body you get from eating like shit and working out for a few months. Only his traps were good. That and his height made him a joke. My theater burst into laughter whenever he was on screen. It's not entirely his fault though, he was miscast from the start.

Bane took out a retired, out of shape Batman. Plus he has a pretty big wekaness.

Bane broke a column and beat and bruised a heavily armored man that just took finished taking down a few well trained mercenaries with ease.

Believe what you want but Batman had some of his better combat feats in this movie.

Originally posted by ares834
I... I don't even... Bane was buff, although not necessarily defined. Nor did he ever appear short in the movie. He looked huge and bulky, like a guy who beats the shit out of people rather than just someone who lifts weights all day.

How... how can anyone consider him buff? He was fat, had spaghetti arms, his back was mediocre, and we didn't even see his legs. His height was obvious, Batman was taller than him even with the camera trickery. Jackman, Hemsworth, Cavill, and Evans all looked a million times better than him.

As for fighting physiques I direct you to guys like Overeem or Lesnar.

Originally posted by Psychotron
How... how can anyone consider him buff? He was fat, had spaghetti arms, his back was mediocre, and we didn't even see his legs. His height was obvious, Batman was taller than him even with the camera trickery. Jackman, Hemsworth, Cavill, and Evans all looked a million times better than him.

As for fighting physiques I direct you to guys like Overeem or Lesnar.

Originally posted by Newjak
We can consider him buff because he was... definitely more so than 70% of guys out there.

So? 90% of people look like shit. Movies stars are supposed to be a cut above the average skinnyfat loser. He was supposed to portray a huge, muscular fighting machine. Instead we ended up with a fat manlet.

I just couldn't take him seriously when I, an average dude who likes to lift, was bigger than freaking Bane. The crappy fight choreography didn't help either.