Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiIt's pretty obvious that Mike Tyson only knocked people out because he was hurt at the time. One does not simply let someone swing at them and retaliate in a fight or a 40 page comic with like 10 pages left without getting hurt.
Huh? That isn't true at all.. My son could hit me.. doesn't mean it hurt me at all.. but it would piss me off and I might retaliate with a punishment.. whatever that might be. Same with a fight.. and you see it all the time in the ufc or any combat sport... You think because a boxer gets hit.. he's hurt or shows signs of being hurt because he fights back? I know you actually don't believe that argument.. and it's shown to be untrue pretty much everyday on spike or late night boxing. The whole premise of... ohh if he wasn't hurt why did he fight back then and not just keep on taking it.. falls flat pretty much every angle you can look at it.
A recent example would be Anderson vs Stephen Boner. Anderson was playing with him and then all of the sudden he dropped him like a worthless sack of Rich Franklin. Boner must have really hurt Anderson bad. I mean, it's only logical science thingamajig stuff
Also, plus 1 for beating your son.