Originally posted by Firefly218He wasn't in the movie save the end. The ring has been in five films. Thanos hasn't been in enough to include him.
Once again, screen time is irrelevant to number of feats. Smiling is a feat, is it not? Surviving in space without a breathing apparatus is also a feat right? You said the basilisk fang can destroy the ring because it has more feats. And that's not my logic, that's your logic.Stay in school
Yes, as the ring does have resistance feats. Thanos has no interactions with anyone at this point so it is unfair to use him at this point.
Let's bet. If Thanos is more formidable than Cap on his own you leave the board forever.
Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Not all bullets are the same speed.
This is correct, a lot of pistols still shoot rounds downrange at a subsonic velocity as opposed to most assault rifles, carbines and of course, anti aircraft machine guns which a prominent one is the MP3 .50 cal which shoots in 25 round bursts. Although the a-10 warthog ( the aircraft in the smallville scene) probably uses both a different caliber and larger round as it is pretty much solely used for attacking ground units, and predominantly armored units. It is known as a tank killer. So namek taking that shot to the chest is actually a better durability feat bit supes "dodging" that was hardly a speed feat. Any human could of stumbled drunkenly out of the way of that particular attack. And probably faster as Clark hesitated for a good second or so before moving.
Originally posted by quanchi112
He wasn't in the movie save the end. The ring has been in five films. Thanos hasn't been in enough to include him.Yes, as the ring does have resistance feats. Thanos has no interactions with anyone at this point so it is unfair to use him at this point.
Let's bet. If Thanos is more formidable than Cap on his own you leave the board forever.
Once again, screen time is irrelevant.
Thanos also has resistance feats. He survived in space without proper equipment. This indicates that he has tough skin so as to not freeze, tough lungs/biology so as to not suffocate etc...
You stated that basilisk fang would destroy ring because it has more feats. The writers for LotR chose not to give the ring more resistance feats - and being lazy - they just had Gandalf tell the audience it was invincible (without visual proof). Similarly, Avengers writers chose not to give Thanos any significant feats, prob to maintain his enigma.
Formidable is subjective. That bet would be disputable. Hell I could argue Scooby Doo is more formidable than Godzilla. It's interpretive.
How about we have a KMC poll. If over 80% of the voters agree that your a troll, you leave this board forever?
Originally posted by ShadowFyre
This is correct, a lot of pistols still shoot rounds downrange at a subsonic velocity as opposed to most assault rifles, carbines and of course, anti aircraft machine guns which a prominent one is the MP3 .50 cal which shoots in 25 round bursts. Although the a-10 warthog ( the aircraft in the smallville scene) probably uses both a different caliber and larger round as it is pretty much solely used for attacking ground units, and predominantly armored units. It is known as a tank killer. So namek taking that shot to the chest is actually a better durability feat bit supes "dodging" that was hardly a speed feat. Any human could of stumbled drunkenly out of the way of that particular attack. And probably faster as Clark hesitated for a good second or so before moving.
I have no opinion on this either way. I was just mentioning that dodging a bullet doesn't mean you have supernatural speed.
Originally posted by ShadowFyre
The farthest right is the most likely round used in the movie as it is fired from a Gau-8 which is the Gatling gun on an A-10.
Correct, the A-10's gun rely of speed and the bullet composition, that being depleted uranium. Those two combinations make it armor piercing and able to take a tank out using bullets rather then missiles armed with explosives.
Originally posted by Firefly218It is indeed relevant. He hasn't been the focal point of a film whereas the rings had three.
Once again, screen time is irrelevant.Thanos also has resistance feats. He survived in space without proper equipment. This indicates that he has tough skin so as to not freeze, tough lungs/biology so as to not suffocate etc...
You stated that basilisk fang would destroy ring because it has more feats. The writers for LotR chose not to give the ring more resistance feats - and being lazy - they just had Gandalf tell the audience it was invincible (without visual proof). Similarly, Avengers writers chose not to give Thanos any significant feats, prob to maintain his enigma.
Formlessness is subjective. That bet would be disputable. Hell I could argue Scooby Doo is more formidable than Godzilla. It's interpretive.
How about we have a KMC poll. If over 80% of the voters agree that your a troll, you leave this board forever?
We don't know what abilities he has yet on screen. Too early to put him in threads.
The Horcruxes are more impressive due to the universe they are in and the feats.
You are changing it into a popularity contest. I want a good bet. You said cap wins so put your ass on the line.
Originally posted by quanchi112
It is indeed relevant. He hasn't been the focal point of a film whereas the rings had three.We don't know what abilities he has yet on screen. Too early to put him in threads.
The Horcruxes are more impressive due to the universe they are in and the feats.
You are changing it into a popularity contest. I want a good bet. You said cap wins so put your ass on the line.
So a character has to be the focal point of the movie to have their feats count?
Screen time does not determine awesomeness of feats. Superman has better feats in his trailer than Spidey has in his entire movie.
I understand the absurdity of saying Cap beats Thanos. I'm giving you a taste of your own medicine by using your logic to prove Cap beats Thanos.
I hope you can now see the immense absurdity of your arguments and why I think your a troll. Then again, trolls keep on trollin.
Originally posted by Firefly218No, I said Thanos hasn't been in a film to know his movie abilities. That's true.
So a character has to be the focal point of the movie to have their feats count?Screen time does not determine awesomeness of feats. Superman has better feats in his trailer than Spidey has in his entire movie.
I understand the absurdity of saying Cap beats Thanos. I'm giving you a taste of your own medicine by using your logic to prove Cap beats Thanos.
I hope you can now see the immense absurdity of your arguments and why I think your a troll. Then again, trolls keep on trollin.
I never said it did but the rings have screen time and enough to gauge whereas Thanos does not.
Thanos isn't like the ring. We have seen the ring defeated. We have not seen Thanos fight or anything yet.
Feats matter. I don't include Maleficent in threads based off previews. Wait until the movie ya nerd.
I destroyed you in that thread hence it still carrying over.
Originally posted by quanchi112
You tried mocking another poster for something you had no clue about. You reek of this in every thread.
I mocked no one.
I simply pointed out that dodging a bullet doesn't make you faster than the bullet. The user responded with a completely irrelevant comment - which is why, out of genuine concern, I asked him if he was on drugs.
You reek of shit in every thread.
Originally posted by Firefly218He said some buckets are faster than others. They are. You tried acting like he was wrong when you were completely ignorant on the matter.
I mocked no one.I simply pointed out that dodging a bullet doesn't make you faster than the bullet. The user responded with a completely irrelevant comment - which is why, out of genuine concern, I asked him if he was on drugs.
You reek of shit in every thread.
Look at the post you quoted when you said it, noob.
You're embarrassing yourself all over the place, kiddo.