Spiderman vs Captain America : Damage Soak

Started by maxivitopowe6 pages

Spiderman vs Captain America : Damage Soak

Who has the better damage soak?

Cap I guess but it's close.

Cap.

Some of the beatings Spidey has taken would have killed Cap.

Some of the beatings Cap has taken would have killed Spidey.

Captain America without any questions has the by far better damage soak.
infact spiderman damage soak suck balls seriously.

Spidey is more durable. Does that count towards damage soak?

Spiderman should have more damage soak. Capt is only peak human.

Originally posted by Terryc250
Spiderman should have more damage soak. Capt is only peak human.

Now you've done it.

As for the thread, IMO its Cap, all other things being equal (so Cap doesn't have body armour etc). Combination of his heart force, HF, and natural durability. Whilst Spidey may have the edge in HF (debatable), it's close enough to not be a massive edge.

Yes, Spidey has a heart force too, but Cap trumps it IMO. Have the two of them stand side by side, and have Beast punch each of them over and over again.....Spidey would fall first.

I don't think Cap could have taken that beating Colossus gave Spidey.

Originally posted by KingD19
I don't think Cap could have taken that beating Colossus gave Spidey.

Could Spidey have taken a point blank shot from Gambit?

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW

Nobody can match Spidey in that regard. He's the best at what he does.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Could Spidey have taken a point blank shot from Gambit?

Hah, have you ever seen Spidey taking on a herald?

Originally posted by abhilegend
Hah, have you ever seen Spidey taking on a herald?

Irrelevant.

Gambit has taken out Gladiator before.

Obviously, Cap's damage soak > Spiderman > Gladiator.

Spidey has tanked lasers. A laser took out Gladiator.

Spidey>>Lasers>>Gladiator

Didn't Spidet get bumrushed there?

Originally posted by red sabre
Captain America without any questions has the by far better damage soak.
infact spiderman damage soak suck balls seriously.
You should be banned for that amount of ignorance. Captain America has substantial armor and he still isn't as durable.

Originally posted by namorsubby
Captain America has substantial armor and he still isn't as durable.

Armour won't protect him from Gambit - in fact, it was his armour that exploded next to his skin. So if anything, the durability/hardness of his armour would count substantially for his durability (imagine have a sheet of metal explode next to your skin vs a sheet of paper).

Also, he's taken laser blasts to the unarmoured face before (am sure you've seen it).

He is not more durable than Spider-Man. This is obvious. He has armor and he still isn't. What is with you guys and Captain America? It's honestly starting to creep me out a lil.