The Batman and Spider-Man swap cities. Who fares better against the other'senemies?

Started by Marvel_Mystic17 pages

Batman is toast. Even low level Spider-Man villains like Shocker would beat him easily.

If Batman gets to use his JLA level Tech he can win quite a few of these battles.

Originally posted by JayDaDon
On average, Spidey's rogues gallery is larger and far more dangerous. Don't act like their interchangeable.

More powerful yea more dangerous no

I would say they are more dangerous. Doc ok alone has been insanely dangerous leading up to superior.

If batman takes a bit of time to get intel on the villains he could take them down without acting to far ooc. Mysterio and Electro are the biggest problem. Not really sure what Bruce could do if he's remotely ic to take down I am electricity Electro. Maybe electro's back to being human though...

If batman just rushes off head first he'd die horribly.

Originally posted by JayDaDon
I would say they are more dangerous. Doc ok alone has been insanely dangerous leading up to superior.
Compare bane to the Rhino and then tell me who's more dangerous. Spider-man villains are typically more powerful but are most certainly less dangerous.

Originally posted by maxivitopowe
Reddit: The bat and spidey swap places

That subreddit is filled with morons.

Originally posted by deathslash
Compare bane to the Rhino and then tell me who's more dangerous. Spider-man villains are typically more powerful but are most certainly less dangerous.

You think Bane is more dangerous than Rhino?

Originally posted by Sin I AM
More powerful yea more dangerous no

Doc Ock by himself is more dangerous than half of Bat's rogues gallery put together.

Originally posted by deathslash
Compare bane to the Rhino and then tell me who's more dangerous. Spider-man villains are typically more powerful but are most certainly less dangerous.

Cool, how bout we use, just to shake things up, Bane and Doc ock and see who's more dangerous? There is far smarter and more ruthless than Rhino to choose from in Spidey's rogues gallery.

In the case of batman v Spider-man I bring up the following

Peak fighters. Or captain America: tie
Bricks: both defeated hulk: tie
Cosmic love threats: darkseid > fire lord

Whenever the question is who wins in a fight against batman... The answer is always batman.

Originally posted by JayDaDon
Cool, how bout we use, just to shake things up, Bane and Doc ock and see who's more dangerous? There is far smarter and more ruthless than Rhino to choose from in Spidey's rogues gallery.

There are also smarter/more dangerous in Bats' rogue gallery (different reasons, of course).

How would Spidey, on his lonesome, deal with Ra's and the League, for example? Bats was tolerated because Ra's wanted his baby batter, but I doubt he'd want a snarky young adult to knock his daughter up.

And then yes, there is the Joker. Goblin is also mad, but never on the scale of the Joker - poisoning all the fish in the US, poisoning almost every supervillain in the world etc etc.

Joker would not last very long on the streets with spidey.

Joker trumps every villian Spiderman ever faced. .hush, the black mask the league would crush Spiderman and kill May for shits n giggles

Not to mention the Court of Owls (post FP) and the Black Glove.

Professor Pyg, Wraith..yeah, Spidey wouldn't fare too well.

^
Yup the Talons are pretty nasty.

Originally posted by Estacado
^
Yup the Talons are pretty nasty.

The Talons alone are bad, but imagine if New York was run from the shadows (and always has been) by a secretive organisation who have their roots in every facet of public life.

Leviathan, headed by Talia, would also mess him up bad. As would the Black Glove - as Jet said:

There's nothing you can do, Bruce — no court on the planet we can't buy, no judge or jury beyond threatening or bribing. There's you rich, down here.....

And then there's Black Glove rich. Oh! I'm just not tall enough.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
There are also smarter/more dangerous in Bats' rogue gallery (different reasons, of course).

How would Spidey, on his lonesome, deal with Ra's and the League, for example? Bats was tolerated because Ra's wanted his baby batter, but I doubt he'd want a snarky young adult to knock his daughter up.

And then yes, there is the Joker. Goblin is also mad, but never on the scale of the Joker - poisoning all the fish in the US, poisoning almost every supervillain in the world etc etc.

Considering a child tween Talia and Pete would be superior then a child tween Bruce and Talia.. i dunno

and would joker be able to effectively become the leader of what is effectively a hyper advanced security service?

R'as might, Talia might as well

hell i'll even say that bane and riddler could as well

but not Joker

Originally posted by maxivitopowe
Considering a child tween Talia and Pete would be superior then a child tween Bruce and Talia.. i dunno

Ra's doesn't see it in pure terms of power mixing. He's not doing an amalgam match. Bruce is superior to Peter for what Ra's is looking for. Parker is and always will be the underdog, the beta male.

Plus, Talia fell in love with Bruce first, only then didRa's begin to consider him.


and would joker be able to effectively become the leader of what is effectively a hyper advanced security service?

R'as might, Talia might as well

hell i'll even say that bane and riddler could as well

but not Joker [/B]

Joker wouldn't want to be the leader of a security service. But that doesn't mean he couldn't. He has led before - witness Joker's Last Laugh, where he's the head of a mad group of super villains, and the Salvation Run storyline, where the villains followed his leadership.

Plus, he almost always has a large gang under his lead.

Edit: double post