Khan vs T-1000 vs E Cullen vs T-X vs Voldemort vs ASM

Originally posted by dadudemon
Hehe, I know which sock-troll you are, now. I figured it was you.

And, yes, it does. You're now denying what was seen onscreen. So, should I start clicking the report button because of your trollery? 🙂

Uhm, from what I understand, the Avara Kadavera does not necessarily destroy the soul (Lily and James make apperances as souls, as does Sirius.) More like it stops the body working, like a massive cardiac arrest, hence the name Kadavea, an anagram of Cadaver, a dead body.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Hehe, I know which sock-troll you are, now. I figured it was you.

And, yes, it does. You're now denying what was seen onscreen. So, should I start clicking the report button because of your trollery? 🙂

No it doesn't. The AK kills. King's Cross was a special one-time case for Harry/Voldemort with Dumbledore randomly thrown in for explaining what that sh1t was to Harry. Going by your ridiculous logic, getting stabbed to death would directly affect the soul. Since that too kills.

Sorry broski, but made-up claims don't count as facts from the movies.

Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
Uhm, from what I understand, the Avara Kadavera does not necessarily destroy the soul (Lily and James make apperances as souls, as does Sirius.) More like it stops the body working, like a massive cardiac arrest, hence the name Kadavea, an anagram of Cadaver, a dead body.

Of course ddm is going to ignore what the potterlore itself tells us in favor of his own silly theories.

Originally posted by Epicurus
Do tell. I am really excited about figuring out what my previously non-existent account was.

No it doesn't. The AK kills. King's Cross was a special one-time case for Harry/Voldemort with Dumbledore randomly thrown in for explaining what that sh1t was to Harry. Going by your ridiculous logic, getting stabbed to death would directly affect the soul. Since that too kills.

Sorry broski, but made-up claims don't count as facts from the movies.

No, what I said. I shouldn't have to constantly requote myself to rebut your replies. That's a sure sign you're an idiot or trolling. 👆 😉 🙂 😄

AK removes the soul and kills the body. The end. You've agreed with me while saying "no" and "derp" 5000 times, now. I am still right. Reply 5000 more times, nothing changes.

Here, let me requote:

"Blue is not actually blue, goddammit! Blue is really just blue!"

Danny Banny Fanny Fanny Bo-Banny.

Originally posted by dadudemon
No, what I said. I shouldn't have to constantly requote myself to rebut your replies. That's a sure sign you're an idiot or trolling. 👆 😉 🙂 😄

AK removes the soul and kills the body. The end. You've agreed with me while saying "no" and "derp" 5000 times, now. I am still right. Reply 5000 more times, nothing changes.

Here, let me requote:

"Blue is not actually blue, goddammit! Blue is really just blue!"

Danny Banny Fanny Fanny Bo-Banny.

AK kills you, the soul leaving the body is a natural after-effect of death. Stop being a moron and watch the films or read the books. Both make clear distinction between direct removal of the soul and death. With the former being considered far worse than the latter in the opinions of in-canon experts like Remus Lupin.

This almost reminds of the Breaking Bad thread where you trolled for what, a half a dozen pages continuously denying that the Nazis stole Walt's money despite all evidence pointing to the contrary.

Originally posted by Epicurus
If you can't even man up and add some substance to your socking allegations, why even bother making them up in the first place? Why bother with this needless buthurt?

AK kills you, the soul leaving the body is a natural after-effect of death. Stop being a moron and watch the films or read the books. Both make clear distinction between direct removal of the soul and death. With the former being considered far worse than the latter in the opinions of in-canon experts like Remus Lupin.

This almost reminds of the Breaking Bad thread where you trolled for what, a half a dozen pages continuously denying that the Nazis stole Walt's money despite all evidence pointing to the contrary.

I won. You lost.

You lost when you argued my point. You tried.

Now bray that I've conceded.

DDM you're wrong as I said before

Originally posted by maxivitopowe
ak kills
dementors suck

Originally posted by maxivitopowe
DDM you're wrong as I said before

You're saying almost the same thing I am, you know that, right?

If I'm wrong, you're wrong. 😐

There.

And that's all I'll say.

Ineresting, according to that the AK didn't even damage the centaur statue....so much for the argument that the ak causes all non-living things it hits to explode regardless of their durability.

No one said that it destroys everything regardless of their durability; who said that?

But good show of missing reference 7, where it blew up the storey of a cottage.

bump

Why?

Because I'm a sadistic Bastard

Originally posted by maxivitopowe
Because I'm a sadistic Bastard

No you just make the stupidest threads on the forum and keep bumping them to get people to talk in them forced out of it being at the top.

Originally posted by Robtard
Why does Edward not only get weapons, but some made up shit he's never used in the films? Tells me biased intent right there.

You don't want to see a super fast and strong vampire wielding two baseball bats made from the same thing as Cap's Shield?

Also people seemed to forget that weapons could be picked up. Ya'll don't think a vampire would use an automatic grenade launcher? How about Spidey yanking one of those bats?

Voldemort wins. Spite thread.

Edit. Oh sh!t, I realized this is a 3 year old necrobumped thread. Nvm.Not about to ask you to dig up something from over 3-5 years ago.

who to dig up what?

Let's chime in for fun. Edward or Garfield Spidey clean up the rest of this crew. Then it's telepathy and super speed/reflexes/strength in Edward vs super duper reflexes/speed/ and strength in Garfield Spidey.