Originally posted by jinXed by JaNx
The fact that Thor is made of flesh and also requires a brain and heart to live 😉
You're aware that Thor's flesh is far more durable than anything Wolverine has actually cut, right?
BTW, you still haven't explained how a cut or stab(assuming he can) would ko Thor, rather than make just him bleed?
Originally posted by FrothByte
Flesh that's mostly bullet proof, can survive outer space and can survive massive amounts of trauma that would pulverize a normal man.
I suppose i'm the only one that actually watched those Thor movies. Without his whamey he's nothing. Also, where do you get this information that his flesh is bullet proof? If his flesh is bullet proof then why does he need to wear armor while fighting against enemies with swords 😕
Now, if you want to talk bullet proof, we can talk bullet proof...,Adamantium skeleton
Thor without his hammer and odin power never showed any kind of special feat. Well, he did beat up some military soldiers 😛
There's nothing that I've seen that suggests, Thor isn't just as vulnerable to adamantium as any other mortal
Originally posted by jinXed by JaNx
I suppose i'm the only one that actually watched those Thor movies. Without his whamey he's nothing. Also, where do you get this information that his flesh is bullet proof? If his flesh is bullet proof then why does he need to wear armor while fighting against enemies with swords 😕 outerspace? Thor can't handle outerspace without odin powerNow, if you want to talk bullet proof, we can talk bullet proof...,Adamantium skeleton
Thor without his hammer and odin power never showed any kind of special feat. Well, he did beat up some military soldiers 😛
Actually without Mjolnir, Thor is still strong enough to block hits from a bloodlusted Hulk and crush Iron-man's armor, he's also durable enough to take hits from sed Hulk and tank the Bi-frost explosion and blasts from Odin's spear..not to mention energy attacks from an amped Iron-man.
For someone that claims to have seen the movies, you seem to lack knowledge of what happened in them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ybnlsnbqgk&feature=youtube_gdata_player
His prowess combined with his durability and strength equals him raping logan.
Originally posted by wallman77
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ybnlsnbqgk&feature=youtube_gdata_playerHis prowess combined with his durability and strength equals him raping logan.
Wow, pretty impressive. I swear, there are scenes that they never should have deleted from both THOR and Thor TDW.
Considering that in Agents of SHIELD we see an Asgardian farmer casually block a knife thrust to the face and crumple it without effort, it's safe to say that a trained Asgardian guard would have better fighting prowess and faster reflexes.
And Thor took on what, 4-5 of them while he was unarmed?
Yeah, Wolverine stands no chance.
Originally posted by jinXed by JaNx
I suppose i'm the only one that actually watched those Thor movies. Without his whamey he's nothing. Also, where do you get this information that his flesh is bullet proof? If his flesh is bullet proof then why does he need to wear armor while fighting against enemies with swords 😕Now, if you want to talk bullet proof, we can talk bullet proof...,Adamantium skeleton
Thor without his hammer and odin power never showed any kind of special feat. Well, he did beat up some military soldiers 😛
There's nothing that I've seen that suggests, Thor isn't just as vulnerable to adamantium as any other mortal
Loki was pretty much bullet-proof against firearms in the Avengers, and he tanked an exploding arrow to the face. So unless you want to tell me that Loki is more durable than Thor, I think it's safe to assume that Thor's durability is comparable.
Thor also gets hit with IM's repulsor rays and Cap's shield without resulting in any injury whatsoever.
Originally posted by FrothByte
Loki was pretty much bullet-proof against firearms in the Avengers, and he tanked an exploding arrow to the face. So unless you want to tell me that Loki is more durable than Thor, I think it's safe to assume that Thor's durability is comparable.Thor also gets hit with IM's repulsor rays and Cap's shield without resulting in any injury whatsoever.
Originally posted by FrothByte
Thor also gets hit with IM's repulsor rays and Cap's shield without resulting in any injury whatsoever.
That was with odin power when he was in possession of Mjolnir. However, it doesn't matter, even with Odin power, Thor is not bullet proof. There is nothing that suggests Thor is impervious to adamantium and arguing otherwise is just silly. You should be focusing more on Thors strengths in this bout which are his is strength because that's the only advantage he has in this fight without his smashey.
Wolverine only has to penetrate six inches into Thors chest or four into his skull to end this fight. Thor on the other hand has to knock Wolverine out from afar because the moment he gets in close Wolverine is going to get that kill shot. We should really stop arguing about Thors durability in attempts to dwarf Logans because his durability feats, however silly, outshine Thors'. At the very least they make him equal. A nuclear blast and resisting the Phoenixs' powers.