Cosmic Armor Superman vs Galactus + Ultimate Nullifier

Originally posted by abhilegend
Yes.

Originally posted by Epicurus
The Cosmic Armor, which gets affected by the heat from a billion suns, is supposed to be the Ultimate Weapon?

Not this shit again...

Originally posted by Epicurus
The Cosmic Armor, which gets affected by the heat from a billion suns, is supposed to be the Ultimate Weapon?

It's not like Galactus hasn't been affected by far less either.

I say Galactus. Partly because I think the Cosmic Armor was a stupid plot invention to begin with, and mainly because, if I take it's in story meta-literary capabilities regarding it being fueled by Superman's "story", which is supposed to be the greatest "story" with Mandrakk feeding on the narrative of DC itself, and then consider that DC has had to reboot it's continuity twice in spite of Superman's great story, that Cosmic Armor has bad fuel and would lose.

So Galactus wins due to not having company wide retcons based on poor sales fueling his ultimate weapon.

Celestial muzzle ftw.

^lol as good a reason as any i've heard for taking g+un.

Originally posted by MF DELPH
I say Galactus. Partly because I think the Cosmic Armor was a stupid plot invention to begin with, and mainly because, if I take it's in story meta-literary capabilities regarding it being fueled by Superman's "story", which is supposed to be the greatest "story" with Mandrakk feeding on the narrative of DC itself, and then consider that DC has had to reboot it's continuity twice in spite of Superman's great story, that Cosmic Armor has bad fuel and would lose.

So Galactus wins due to not having company wide retcons based on poor sales fueling his ultimate weapon.

Celestial muzzle ftw.

That's ****ing stupid.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It isn't. We go by abilities, feats not random hyperbolic statements alone.

oh gosh the idiocity with this guy. he didnt read about cosmic armor sups he doesnt know about him but he is using the same lame excuse all people use, bla bla hyperbole bla bla not impressed.

Originally posted by MF DELPH
I say Galactus. Partly because I think the Cosmic Armor was a stupid plot invention to begin with, and mainly because, if I take it's in story meta-literary capabilities regarding it being fueled by Superman's "story", which is supposed to be the greatest "story" with Mandrakk feeding on the narrative of DC itself, and then consider that DC has had to reboot it's continuity twice in spite of Superman's great story, that Cosmic Armor has bad fuel and would lose.

So Galactus wins due to not having company wide retcons based on poor sales fueling his ultimate weapon.

Celestial muzzle ftw.

wow thats seriously a stupid post. you think galactus wins because you dont like the cosmic armor? that sure is one hell of an argument you got there 😬

Originally posted by MF DELPH
I say Galactus. Partly because I think the Cosmic Armor was a stupid plot invention to begin with, and mainly because, if I take it's in story meta-literary capabilities regarding it being fueled by Superman's "story", which is supposed to be the greatest "story" with Mandrakk feeding on the narrative of DC itself, and then consider that DC has had to reboot it's continuity twice in spite of Superman's great story, that Cosmic Armor has bad fuel and would lose.

So Galactus wins due to not having company wide retcons based on poor sales fueling his ultimate weapon.

Celestial muzzle ftw.

Makes sense.

Everyone else, you're ignoring the part where he said it was MAINLY due to the weaknesses of the Supes story.

gawd people can be thick.....lol

I'd like to see Cosmic Armor Superman destroy and recreate a multiverse 😄

Originally posted by JuggernautMania
oh gosh the idiocity with this guy. he didnt read about cosmic armor sups he doesnt know about him but he is using the same lame excuse all people use, bla bla hyperbole bla bla not impressed.

Man, I almost bit Quanchi's bait, but didn't.

I guess this is what being an adult feels like.