Superman vs Voldermort

Started by Time Immemorial22 pages

Superman vs Voldermort

Reeves/Routh Superman vs Voldermort

This is a quan bait thread, isn't it?

Any Superman can blitz his ass before he can think

Voldemort, easily.

😐

Originally posted by juggerman
😐
?

Why? Just why?

Originally posted by juggerman
Why? Just why?
Me ?

Supes just outright stomps.

lmao, Superman can fly fast enough to turn back earth's rotation, which should be relativistic at least, whereas Voldemort has no feats above peak human in reactions. Good luck trying to think a thing before you're blitzed and grinded to powder

Originally posted by God Cloth Seiya
Supes just outright stomps.
Based on ?

Faster, stronger, more durable, better feats.

Originally posted by God Cloth Seiya
Faster, stronger, more durable, better feats.
Voldemort kills him with one spell. We see Superman tagged left and right by very slow attacks. Watch him stand around and get tagged by the Richard Pryor machine, Zod, etc.

Crucio also works. Durability can't save him from these magical attacks, noob.

MOS superman isn't weak against magic noob.

Every single kryptonion is faster than voldemort.

Originally posted by God Cloth Seiya
MOS superman isn't weak against magic noob.

Every single kryptonion is faster than voldemort.

What magic has he faced to make that claim ?

Superman has been hit by much slower attacks than what Voldemort possesses.

Superman gets tagged left and right by very slow attacks. Evidence, bro.

What "slow attacks" have hit Superman

Even then, it'd be a low showing, since Supes has flown around the earth so fast he turned it back around

Originally posted by StealthRanger
What "slow attacks" have hit Superman

Even then, it'd be a low showing, since Supes has flown around the earth so fast he turned it back around

Richard Pryor machine attack, manhole throw, truck slamming into him, etc.

He didn't do so in combat so irrelevant.

lolobviouslowshowings

Knew you were going to try and pull a "combat speed" argument. I'm honestly curious to see how you prove such a thing

Of course knowing you it'll be a "it looked slow so it is slow" argument amirite?

Originally posted by StealthRanger
lolobviouslowshowings

Knew you were going to try and pull a "combat speed" argument. I'm honestly curious to see how you prove such a thing

Of course knowing you it'll be a "it looked slow so it is slow" argument amirite?

You want me to ignore the showings due to bias. We accept all showings, buttercup.

You don't show someone sprinting and then ignorantly say they fight at this speed.

What are you talking about ?

Originally posted by quanchi112
You want me to ignore the showings due to bias. We accept all showings, buttercup.

You don't show someone sprinting and then ignorantly say they fight at this speed.

What are you talking about ?

No, it's called positive feedback, where we take the upper end showings and assume it to be an accurate portrayal of their abilities. Most debating sites, this one included use it

Since fiction is riddled with low ends, if you want to nitpick and use a true mean we get shit like city block skyfathers, street level DBZ characters. Reason why verses like Marvel, DC. WH40K, DBZ and most other verses are considered as powerful as they are (favoring use of high end showings)

Can, will and just did. Are you honestly trying to say that Superman cannot percieve his own flight? Or that he slows himself down a million times intentionally when he's fighting someone worth a shit (like say, Zod)