Harry potter and Dumbledore vs Iron man and War machine

Started by KingD195 pages

I'm sorry. What about the Harry Potter Movieverse was so fundamentally different from the books that that quote no longer holds credence?

Was it how they were both pretty much exactly the same?

That must be it.

Originally posted by KingD19
I'm sorry. What about the Harry Potter Movieverse was so fundamentally different from the books that that quote no longer holds credence?

Was it how they were both pretty much exactly the same?

That must be it.

I didn't read the books but from what I have been told he wasn't aware of the Horcruxes being destroyed whereas in the movies he knew immediately. Movie feats only, old sport.

Originally posted by maxivitopowe
there is always the reducto spell
but if that fails then the wizards are boned

How destructive is that? :hmm

Originally posted by quanchi112
I didn't read the books but from what I have been told he wasn't aware of the Horcruxes being destroyed whereas in the movies he knew immediately. Movie feats only, old sport.

Okay first, seriously? Him knowing pieces of his soul were being destroyed is such a huuuuge difference that it makes gun toting people no longer a threat? I'm gonna need a citation on that.

Second, I never said anything about feats, but if we wanna talk feats.

Iron Man uses his laser that cut through reinforced titanium like a hot knife through butter in 2 seconds.

Iron Man and War Machine simply punch them and send them flying.

Iron Man and War Machine use repulsors, which send them flying.

Iron Man shoots his tank missile that blows them both up.

Iron Man and War Machine use their Unibeams.

I could go on. And since pretty much every spell will uselessly bounce off their armor, and with their human reaction time they can't dodge anything...the Brits lose to America...again.

Originally posted by KingD19
Okay first, seriously? Him knowing pieces of his soul were being destroyed is such a huuuuge difference that it makes gun toting people no longer a threat? I'm gonna need a citation on that.

Second, I never said anything about feats, but if we wanna talk feats.

Iron Man uses his laser that cut through reinforced titanium like a hot knife through butter in 2 seconds.

Iron Man and War Machine simply punch them and send them flying.

Iron Man and War Machine use repulsors, which send them flying.

Iron Man shoots his tank missile that blows them both up.

Iron Man and War Machine use their Unibeams.

I could go on. And since pretty much every spell will uselessly bounce off their armor, and with their human reaction time they can't dodge anything...the Brits lose to America...again.

So you admit that is a huge difference with the books so my point is proven. They are different. Quit citing the books when we are discussing the movies.

Nope. Dumbledore easily wrecks them with his fire spell he used on the Inferi. 🙂

Iron Man suits went down easily in part three.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So you admit that is a huge difference with the books so my point is proven. They are different. Quit citing the books when we are discussing the movies.

Nope. Dumbledore easily wrecks them with his fire spell he used on the Inferi. 🙂

Iron Man suits went down easily in part three.

That's not enough of a difference to make anything the creator of the books and a very big part of the creative process when it came to the movies lose credibility. Sensing his soul being destroyed now means bullets can't hurt him...that's what your saying right?

And the suits went down easily because Tony was just making them to make them. They were pieces of crap for the most part and that was pointed out as he was exhausted and not thinking straight as he built them. But look how well War Machine stood up to punishment as well as his real armor.

Also, if you're comparing Dumbledore's fire spell to Extremis soldiers who can insta-melt high grade steel and spit magma...well that's actually normal for you. Wizard schlong so far down your throat it's cutting off oxygen to your brain.

Originally posted by KingD19
That's not enough of a difference to make anything the creator of the books and a very big part of the creative process when it came to the movies lose credibility. Sensing his soul being destroyed now means bullets can't hurt him...that's what your saying right?

And the suits went down easily because Tony was just making them to make them. They were pieces of crap for the most part and that was pointed out as he was exhausted and not thinking straight as he built them. But look how well War Machine stood up to punishment as well as his real armor.

Also, if you're comparing Dumbledore's fire spell to Extremis soldiers who can insta-melt high grade steel and spit magma...well that's actually normal for you. Wizard schlong so far down your throat it's cutting off oxygen to your brain.

That is only one difference which is huge. There are others. They are different. They are based off the books. Think.

Magical fire. We see in part three the suits easily go down. You don't even debate under the rules.

Movie Dumbledore solos.

Originally posted by quanchi112

Magical fire. We see in part three the suits easily go down. You don't even debate under the rules.

So you're going to ignore the scenes showing that the suits were hastily and poorly put together just because Tony couldn't sleep and needed something to occupy his time?

Also do you have any evidence that shows how hot the fire burned? Inferi are bad against fire, but the temperatures the Extremis reached(actually belching magma) is far above any sort of normal looking fire unless you can prove it's similar in temperatures.

Wizards are not immune to bullets, lasers, missiles or repulsors.

Which is why any of Iron mans armors would solo.

Originally posted by KingD19
So you're going to ignore the scenes showing that the suits were hastily and poorly put together just because Tony couldn't sleep and needed something to occupy his time?

Also do you have any evidence that shows how hot the fire burned? Inferi are bad against fire, but the temperatures the Extremis reached(actually belching magma) is far above any sort of normal looking fire unless you can prove it's similar in temperatures.

I am saying that despite that his suits can't hold up against Dumbledore's for and his absolute mastery of this spell.

I have the suits being destroyed and his fire burning through water.

🙂

Re: Harry potter and Dumbledore vs Iron man and War machine

Originally posted by DrDeadpool
Tony and Colonel find themselves in a weird place then face these two wizards , which team wins?

They might be able to take down one IM suit, likely Rhodes since he's not as quick and smart as Stark. The other suit kills the wizards.

The Iron Men win majority.

Seriously? Dumbledore can teleport and turn their armor to sand with Reducto. After that he can do whatever he likes: Crucio, Avada Kadavra, turn them into kettles and make tea in them, etc..

Also, wizards seem to be able to disable muggle electronics easily, see: that barkeeper who shut off a car alarm with a flick of his wand.

Or alternatively the suits just shoot the wizards dead.

Dumbledore can just twist them into a bloody ball of metal and flesh. The suits can be manipulated like anything else.

"Accio arc reactors!"

The Iron Men can't stop this.

I'm pretty sure missiles, lasers, and bullets are faster than an old man's mouth.

How can Dumbledore say "Accio arc reactors!" when he doesn't even know that arc reactors exist?

Originally posted by quanchi112
I didn't read the books but from what I have been told he wasn't aware of the Horcruxes being destroyed whereas in the movies he knew immediately. Movie feats only, old sport.

IIRC, he learnt of Harry and co's plot to destroy the horcruxes only after he was made aware of the theft at Gringotts in the second part of the film. Which is exactly how it went down in the books as well.

Heck, the books actually go so far as to say that he can't feel it when a horcrux is destroyed, as the pieces of soul have been detached for so long that he no longer feels as a human does.

Originally posted by Silent Master
How can Dumbledore say "Accio arc reactors!" when he doesn't even know that arc reactors exist?

General knowledge, no?