Originally posted by StoicTechnically, breaking boards is a matter of power, which is strength x speed. As such, potentially, a faster puncher could break more boards than a stronger one.
That still doesn't remove the fact that the guy breaking the boards required a certain level of strength in order to break those boards. If we were to only use combat feats, guys like Shang Chi, would be top tier. I agree with SIA on this, there needs to be a happy medium.
Regardless, yes, a combo would be ideal. But the OP seemed to present an 'either-or' option.
Really I think Space Cheese is more important because it gives a basis to which to rate combat fts on. If there was no space cheese fts and only combat fts, then we would not truly know how much powerful one character is just they are able to beat said character in combat not them going all out. If that makes any sense.
Good idea for a thread.
I second what Sin said.
Also combat feats can be used to judge characters power levels as well even though PIS/jobbing occurs. For example for every time say Cap is shown beating Hulk there are 5 examples with Hulk stomping the entire Avengers team with Cap being among them. Doesn't take much logic to realize that Cap in general is many tires below Hulk even though he's beaten him that one time. And space cheese feats simply compliment what we already figured out by ourselves.
Originally posted by -Pr-
"Space cheese" is a horrible name, especially with how a lot of the feats actually happen on Earth.They both have importance, but "cheese" (stupid ****ing name), is less important obviously.
Originally posted by carver9
Stop hating on my terms.
Originally posted by -Pr-
Then come up with better ones.
Originally posted by carver9
I couldn't think of a better name for it. 😠By the way, rarely see you online anymore.
nchef - Non Combat High End Feat/s
I hereby proclaim the phrase "space cheese feat", forever stricken hence forth from these here KMC forums...