Originally posted by StoicIt happens to all of the characters, the only reason that it hasn't happened more to Firelord is because his appearances are ew and far between. There was certainly context to Cannonball beating him, and I bet the hit that Gladiator took from Cannonball would have KO'd Firelord, after all Gladiator's own punch was redirected back at him due to Cannonballs peculiar power. I brought up Speedball, because he did a similar move on Terrax. My point? All characters get beaten up. The Silver Surfer was subdued by the Black Panther, Cap KO'd the Hulk, Juggernaut was clowned by Longshot, Ultraboy was clowned by the Karater Kid... the list goes on, and on.
This however has no bearing on Gladiator at his best taking on Firelord if we lose the low ball moments. Gladiator was also on a team that always appeared to be oppressive, and plot dictated his losses most of the time. I fail to see how a softy like Firelord would possess enough strength to beat someone nearly twice his strength.
but you didnt answer me. why are you calling firelord losing to spider man an OK feat. however gladiator losing to guys like gambit and canonball suddenly is PIS? firelord on average is always portrayed as a herald. he took out surfer and thor. gladiator? only lose to guys like those never did once gladiator defeated someone on thor caliber or hulk. gladiator is a joke.
you are just like everybody here like to throw the word lowballing. however how is it lowballing gladiator when he always gets beat up by everyone? if i am lowballing then show me all his great feats. on top of each good feat there are 3 to 5 feats of him getting his ass beat by low healds and even metas. lowballing is when you discredit a character of his high and normal showigns and only choose his low. however i am adressing gladiators overall most showings, thats no lowballing.
by fighting feats firelord did better in fights vs the top guns than gladiator.
Originally posted by JuggernautMania
but you didnt answer me. why are you calling firelord losing to spider man an OK feat. however gladiator losing to guys like gambit and canonball suddenly is PIS? firelord on average is always portrayed as a herald. he took out surfer and thor. gladiator? only lose to guys like those never did once gladiator defeated someone on thor caliber or hulk. gladiator is a joke.you are just like everybody here like to throw the word lowballing. however how is it lowballing gladiator when he always gets beat up by everyone? if i am lowballing then show me all his great feats. on top of each good feat there are 3 to 5 feats of him getting his ass beat by low healds and even metas. lowballing is when you discredit a character of his high and normal showigns and only choose his low. however i am adressing gladiators overall most showings, thats no lowballing.
by fighting feats firelord did better in fights vs the top guns than gladiator.
Originally posted by tkitna
Didn't Hercules beat the living shit out of Firelord though? I must go search for some pics.
Originally posted by tkitna
I guess he just punched him and knocked some sense into him. I don't have the scan before this so I cant remember what it was all about. Oh well.Taking Gladiator
srug
Originally posted by JBL
Do you know the difference between powerful and strength? Silver Surfer is powerful.... Kurse is strong.
Also I can't help but laugh at Gladiator's DNA being involved in creating a clone somehow translating in Gladiator's strength feats. What's next, X-man being created by Scott and Jean and being far more powerful than Jean without PF translating into Scott being a better telepath than Jean?
facepalm
Originally posted by abhilegendCan you understand anything? Gladiators DNA contributed the STRENGTH of the clone, Thanos is not 4x stronger than himself.... Who's DNA gave Warrior his strength? Thanos ( think before you answer ) or Gladiator? Who do you think gave kid gladiator his strength? His mother? 馃檮
So Thanos+Gladiator=Almost as powerful as Thanos. What did Gladiator contribute actually?Also I can't help but laugh at Gladiator's DNA being involved in creating a clone somehow translating in Gladiator's strength feats. What's next, X-man being created by Scott and Jean and being far more powerful than Jean without PF translating into Scott being a better telepath than Jean?
facepalm
Originally posted by JBL
Can you understand anything? Gladiators DNA contributed the STRENGTH of the clone, Thanos is not 4x stronger than himself.... Who's DNA gave Warrior his strength? Thanos ( think before you answer ) or Gladiator? Who do you think gave kid gladiator his strength? His mother? 馃檮
馃槀
Pretty great logic right there.
Originally posted by abhilegendChrist... Omega ate planet after planet, how powerful do you think he will get??? Thats why thanos called him a mistake.... Thanos is powerful and Galactus is powerful... combine the two and yes he will be more powerful than galactus plus all he did was eat planets back to back getting even more powerful. Combine thanos and gladiator and you get gladiators biggest asset.... STRENGTH.Who knew Thanos was as powerful as Galactus.