Bills (DBZBOTG) & Asura vs. Thanos & Darkseid

Started by ZebusKing9 pages

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
I don't think any DBZ character could actually destroy a star, lol. It'd be much more likely they'd destroy each planet in the solar system individually, thus 'destroying it', if a DBZ character were to do so, like what Buu was doing, teleporting around breaking things.

Cell's claim doesn't mean much.

It's more on the lines of throwing DBZ fans a bone. I let them have their solar system claim, not that it means much.

Originally posted by ZebusKing
I already read it, you haven't apparently. The blast from Galactus in Annihilation, the one that Surfer flew from, destroyed 3 solar systems.

THIS WAS CONFIRMED IN ANNIHILATION

http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/4/47437/1308821-galactusshockwave1oz9.jpg

No where in ANY comic does it state Galactus destroyed a galaxy. It stated that when Annihilation Wave across the galaxy was swept clean, NOT BY GALACTUS NUKING THE GALAXY.

Also where does it state that Omega is 2x as powerful as Galactus? I'm reading Infinity Abyss right now on Marvel Unlimited and Genis Vell states that Omega's power dwarfs the original, not that he's 2x as powerful.

More importantly, where does it state that Omega blasted Thanos at full power? Which someone claimed earlier? Oh yeah it never did

Thanos fanboys are almost as bad as DBZ fanboys when it comes to making sh*t up.


Your own oversized scan says that the "Galactus obliteration perimeter encompasses 3 star systems and does not slow down". Which means it was expanding beyond three solar systems.

Nope, the panels just stated that "it swept the galaxy clean".
http://i238.photobucket.com/albums/ff240/Branlactus/Raw%20power/thanos_004.jpg

You're one to talk about fanboys taking things out of context, given your severely lacking reading comprehension.

Originally posted by ZebusKing
No it doesn't. The only thing here that's been referenced is that the Annihilation Wave across the galaxy was destroyed.

What dumbasses are trying to imply is that Galactus blast single handedly destroyed the Annihilation Wave, which is utter horse shit.

[B]What actually happened was that Galactus destroyed the Annihilation Wave within a few solar systems. . The rest of the Annihilation Wave signed a treaty to back off the Kree. [/B]


Calm down, bruv. I understand that neither reading comprehension nor being truthful is your strongest suit, but no need to go all internet warrior over such a small issue.

Originally posted by Bro SMASH
I just want to know, how much DO you know about Asura?

Asura is a reminiscent of the four or six? armed hindi or buhdist demi god, he wrecks starfleets and busts planet sized bosses. Granted he does it like a boss but his feats a replicable by most everyone here, just not with as much screaming and quick time actioning. (he literally out does Dragon Ball in screaming... now that is acredible feat.)

Originally posted by Epicurus
Your own oversized scan says that the "Galactus obliteration perimeter encompasses 3 star systems and does not slow down". Which means it was expanding beyond three solar systems.

Nope, the panels just stated that "it swept the galaxy clean".
http://i238.photobucket.com/albums/ff240/Branlactus/Raw%20power/thanos_004.jpg

You're one to talk about fanboys taking things out of context, given your severely lacking reading comprehension.

Calm down, bruv. I understand that neither reading comprehension nor being truthful is your strongest suit, but no need to go all internet warrior over such a small issue.

Arguments over dude, I'm sorry it took you a week to conjure, type and formulate a post. Maybe that's why stupid people like yourself should stay off the internet.

1st of all you're making the assumption that Galactus destroyed the entire Annihilation Wave. I guess you didn't read the end of Annihilation when they signed a treaty with the Kree.

I guess you also didn't see freaking Nova, Phyla and dozens of others survive that same supposed galaxy destroying blast.

"Galaxy Swept Clean" Does this mean that every inch of the galaxy was destroyed?

No, you'd have to make the assumption that the Annihilation Wave was spread across the entire galaxy, which wasn't the case.

The difference between us, I actually read the comic, I actually know the context. YOU do not and trying to talk shit about reading comprehension when you didn't even read the comic in the first place is really back firing on you.

It doesn't matter anyway, Even if you still think the entire galaxy was engulfed by Galaxy, the argument originally made when The Tyrant was wanking Thanos was that Thanos survived a galaxy busting attack, which isn't remotely impressive considering he was already dead, and that it wasn't a concentrated blast and was spread out across the galaxy.

Considering this me throwing you a bone.

Originally posted by ZebusKing
Arguments over dude, I'm sorry it took you a week to conjure, type and formulate a post. Maybe that's why stupid people like yourself should stay off the internet.

1st of all you're making the assumption that Galactus destroyed the entire Annihilation Wave. I guess you didn't read the end of Annihilation when they signed a treaty with the Kree.

I guess you also didn't see freaking Nova, Phyla and dozens of others survive that same supposed galaxy destroying blast.

"Galaxy Swept Clean" Does this mean that every inch of the galaxy was destroyed?

No, you'd have to make the assumption that the Annihilation Wave was spread across the entire galaxy, which wasn't the case.

The difference between us, I actually read the comic, I actually know the context. YOU do not and trying to talk shit about reading comprehension when you didn't even read the comic in the first place is really back firing on you.

It doesn't matter anyway, Even if you still think the entire galaxy was engulfed by Galaxy, the argument originally made when The Tyrant was wanking Thanos was that Thanos survived a galaxy busting attack, which isn't remotely impressive considering he was already dead, and that it wasn't a concentrated blast and was spread out across the galaxy.

Considering this me throwing you a bone.


Maybe the internet means everything to you, but I actually have a life.

Nope, I know for a fact that he didn't destroy all of them because:
1)The Negative Zone constantly revives the dead, and
2)The Wave featured in Hickman's Fantastic Four, where Johnny Storm led them into battle against the Kree. Incidentally, they were getting their asses beaten by the Kree this time, and it too Galactus to save the day.

Plot. Nova has the Novaforce protecting him.

Read the scan. It says it all.

The difference between us is that you have not the first clue as to what powerlevel a fed Galactus operates upon. And he was fed here, since he performed that attack after absorbing the energy from those PC-containers.

Consider this me being generous enough not to e-stomp you like the annoying little e-cockroach you are, sock.

No one is denying that Galactus is capable of destroying a galaxy, he clearly is.

Only if that's what happened in Annihilation, which clearly isn't the case. Unless of course you still think the Annihilation Wave was in every inch of the galaxy when...it wasn't.

Galactus wasn't fed, Surfer had just freed him, where does it show him absorbing energy? Scans? Because it certainly isn't in Annihilation 5 or 6.

And here I thought you had read the comics.😂

The scans posted previously clearly state that the blast had reached 3 solar systems and was going beyond, and eventually spanned the galaxy. 😬

Thanos has survived a black hole. He has also survived shots from beings like the Maker and Odin. He also tanked a point blank scream from Black Bolt in Infinity. You know, the guy who can tear open a parsecs wide hole in space with his scream. It's pretty obvious that at his best he has insane durability feats.

Come on.

Originally posted by Epicurus
And here I thought you had read the comics.😂

The scans posted previously clearly state that the blast had reached 3 solar systems and was going beyond, and eventually spanned the galaxy. 😬

Thanos has survived a black hole. He has also survived shots from beings like the Maker and Odin. He also tanked a point blank scream from Black Bolt in Infinity. You know, the guy who can tear open a parsecs wide hole in space with his scream. It's pretty obvious that at his best he has insane durability feats.

Come on.

😆 😆

It never stated anything about spanning the galaxy. It stated that it encompassed 3 solar systems and wasn't slowing down. In case you're wondering the galaxies can contain anywhere from 400 billion to 100 trillion solar systems. Even if it was a small galaxy at the rate that blast was going it probably would of taken at minimum a few days to cover every inch of the galaxy. But again, his ability to destroy a galaxy isn't question here.

If this is the scan of Thanos surviving a black hole.

http://lounge.moviecodec.com/images/attachment/goku-vs-thanos-and-darkseid-23174.jpg

His ship was clearly outside the event horizon.

Thanos was knocked out by the Maker.

As far as Odin and Black Bolt go, no one said Thanos didn't have damage soak, the argument made was that Thanos can survive a galaxy busting attack which is out of context, because even if you wanted to assume Galactus did wipe out the galaxy the attack is spread out as oppose to a concentrated attack.

Originally posted by ZebusKing
😆 😆

It never stated anything about spanning the galaxy. It stated that it encompassed 3 solar systems and wasn't slowing down. In case you're wondering the galaxies can contain anywhere from 400 billion to 100 trillion solar systems. Even if it was a small galaxy at the rate that blast was going it probably would of taken at minimum a few days to cover every inch of the galaxy. But again, his ability to destroy a galaxy isn't question here.

If this is the scan of Thanos surviving a black hole.

http://lounge.moviecodec.com/images/attachment/goku-vs-thanos-and-darkseid-23174.jpg

His ship was clearly outside the event horizon.

Thanos was knocked out by the Maker.

As far as Odin and Black Bolt go, no one said Thanos didn't have damage soak, the argument made was that Thanos can survive a galaxy busting attack which is out of context, because even if you wanted to assume Galactus did wipe out the galaxy the attack is spread out as oppose to a concentrated attack.


This is stupid. You're going to great lengths to avoid admitting that it was a galactic-scale attack. I mean what's even the point of referencing the largest galaxy known on record?

You do realize that the blast was obviously expanding at an ftl rate? It encompassed 3 solar systems immediately after Galactus' ""Herald my Rage" proclamation. It's no surprise that it would wipe the galaxy clean within a matter of few hours.

Nope, his ship was disintegrated by the blast. Thanos survived the black hole with minimal injury to his own person, as he himself later admits to Gamora.

Their second encounter, he traded blows with her, tanked her hits and defeated her.

Okay, if you want to argue that the blast was spread out and not concentrated, I can understand that. But there is no need to lowball Galactus' feat for that matter.

No one is low balling Galactus, in fact I've already stated several times that it's in his ability to destroy a galaxy, the only thing that's questionable is that instance which a certain Thanos fan wanker brought up.

Even if it was going at a FTL rate it would of still taken a minimum of days if not longer to ecompass every corner of the galaxy.

No, his ship was clearly outside the event horizon. His ship was destroyed, he sustained damage, but there is absolutely no evidence that Thanos was in the black hole when it collapsed.

Originally posted by ZebusKing
No one is low balling Galactus

You are.
Originally posted by ZebusKing

Even if it was going at a FTL rate it would of still taken a minimum of days if not longer to ecompass every corner of the galaxy.

Nope, it wouldn't.
Originally posted by ZebusKing

No, his ship was clearly outside the event horizon. His ship was destroyed, he sustained damage, but there is absolutely no evidence that Thanos was in the black hole when it collapsed.

His ship was destroyed. He stated he survived the black hole. No need to add your own twist to the feat.

Originally posted by Epicurus
You are.

Nope, it wouldn't.

His ship was destroyed. He stated he survived the black hole. No need to add your own twist to the feat.

Except that I'm not, low balling would be claiming that Galactus would be unable to destroy a galaxy.

Yeah, it would. Do a bit of Googling and you'll come up with the same conclusion.

The black hole destroyed his ship, there is no evidence of him physically being inside the black hole. He survived it by being outside the event horizon.

Your wanking is getting out of hand, take it down a notch Jr.

Originally posted by ZebusKing
Except that I'm not

Yes you are.
Originally posted by ZebusKing

Yeah, it would. Do a bit of Googling and you'll come up with the same conclusion.

No I wouldn't.
Originally posted by ZebusKing

The black hole destroyed his ship, there is no evidence of him physically being inside the black hole. He survived it by being outside the event horizon.

He stated that he had a run-in with the black hole. Yes there is; his bloodied naked body. Stop adding your own stupid twist on the feat.
Originally posted by ZebusKing

Your wanking is getting out of hand, take it down a notch Jr.

Your trolling is getting out of hand, take it down a notch sock.

Originally posted by Epicurus
Yes you are.

No I wouldn't.

He stated that he had a run-in with the black hole. Yes there is; his bloodied naked body. Stop adding your own stupid twist on the feat.

Your trolling is getting out of hand, take it down a notch sock.

You need to look up the definition of low balling. Low balling would be saying that Galactus is unable to destroy a galaxy which no one has stated.

If you're too stupid to do the actual calculations, light would take a bit under 11 hours to cross one solar system, now try doing that with at a minimum of a few hundred million.

He stated he had a run in with a black hole. His ship is CLEARLY Outside the Event Horizon.

He doesn't have to be inside the black hole. Being in vicinity of it alone would cause his ship to disintegrate and cause him damage.

Did he take damage? Yes, was he directly in the black hole which Thanos wankers like yourself are implying? NO.

Come back with some actual evidence next time, if I read any more of your fan fic then I'm accepting this as your concession.

Originally posted by ZebusKing
You need to look up the definition of low balling.

Why, when I have an excellent example of it right here in this thread in the form of your post?
Originally posted by ZebusKing

If you're too stupid to do the actual calculations, light would take a bit under 11 hours to cross one solar system, now try doing that with at a minimum of a few hundred million.

FTL means faster than light. I love it when self-proclaimed forum math geniuses try to do their ridic number crunching. Always good for a laugh.
Originally posted by ZebusKing

He stated he had a run in with a black hole. His ship is CLEARLY Outside the Event Horizon.

Do you not understand what having a run with a black hole means? His ship was destroyed.
Originally posted by ZebusKing

He doesn't have to be inside the black hole. Being in vicinity of it alone would cause his ship to disintegrate and cause him damage.
It would cause his ship to disintegrate, why would it cause him damage? Especially when high heralds have operated inside black holes without getting so much as a scratch.
[QUOTE=14735708]Originally posted by ZebusKing
[B]
Did he take damage?

From the black hole, yes.
Originally posted by ZebusKing

Come back with some actual evidence next time, if I read any more of your fan fic then I'm accepting this as your concession.

Says the sock-troll who pretends that he reads comics, and likes to put his own twist on feats.😂

It was stated that the blast already engulfed 3 solar systems. How long do you think it was between Galactus launching his attack and the time he destroyed 3 solar systems? Even if it was only a few seconds it would of still taken days to engulf every inch of the galaxy.

You don't have to be a math genius to know this. These are facts you're apparently too stupid to acknowledge even though you can reach the same conclusion through 10-15 seconds of Googling.

Yes he was damaged by the black hole, but he was OUTSIDE the black hole as well.

He didn't need to be inside the black hole to sustain any damage. He only needed to be within proximity of the Event Horizon and his ship still would been destroyed and he still would of taken damage.

Trying to put a twist on feats...ironic coming from the tard who keeps insisting that Thanos was actually IN a black hole when it was destroyed even though the scan shows the complete opposite.

Thanos wankers love making up fan fic. Can't wait to see what hot garbage you'll come up with next. 😂

User banned by Badabing, permanently

Reason: Sock/Troll

I hate my precognitive abilities.

Arguments done Epicurus, you've been beaten, let it go now. Regurgitating the same debunked nonsense isn't going to help you. It's just going to justify the rep Thanos wankers have earned.

Another dupe? :hmm

Originally posted by MDFreeman
Arguments done Epicurus, you've been beaten, let it go now. Regurgitating the same debunked nonsense isn't going to help you. It's just going to justify the rep Thanos wankers have earned.

I am willing to bet that you can last a whole month without getting permabanned again for socking, sock.