Originally posted by DigiI've heard people use this expression several times but don't get it it. Judging by the context of the post you're saying that Fisk will beat Lester. But "Wilson's fight to lose" sounds like Fisk's going to take a beating. Can someone explain?
This is Wilson's fight to lose.
Originally posted by SamZED
I've heard people use this expression several times but don't get it it. Judging by the context of the post you're saying that Fisk will beat Lester. But "Wilson's fight to lose" sounds like Fisk's going to take a beating. Can someone explain?
It means if Fisk loses, its because he messed up badly.
Like how Thanos subconscously loses.
In other words, he will not lose because of anything Bullseye does.
Originally posted by SamZED
I've heard people use this expression several times but don't get it it. Judging by the context of the post you're saying that Fisk will beat Lester. But "Wilson's fight to lose" sounds like Fisk's going to take a beating. Can someone explain?
Just an expression. Like if someone is a much better sports team...they won't lose because of anything the other team does. They'll only lose if they come out flat and play a horribly sub-par game. It's theirs to lose. But they're the better team, and should be considered the favorite. Same with Fisk.