Originally posted by DarthDuelist9
Isn't Darth Bane automatically superior to any of the ancients?
Lol. Shot down you cred in one-hit son. You were spouting that good shit before about quotes not being legit if they didn't align with the primary material.
To go from such a pearl of wisdom to questioning Bane > Vitiate.
GTFO
Originally posted by Ziggystardust
Lol. Shot down you cred in one-hit son. You were spouting that good shit before about quotes not being legit if they didn't align with the primary material.To go from such a pearl of wisdom to questioning Bane > Vitiate.
GTFO
First of all, I never said that the quote itself wasn't legit but the interpretation of the quote, quite a big difference. Secondly, the quote regarding Darth Bane is mentioned in Fact File, which doesn't mention the Old Republic era so no Bane isn't superior to Vitiate but it should still apply to the ancient Sith (Kun, Ragnos, ...).
Dooku on par with Malgus.
Hmm. Do you see Dooku capable of holding Vader+ level guy, another Jedi, and another being at the same time in a Force choke?
Post-vanilla HoT was already capable of resisting weakened Vitiate's Force power enough to drop him in close quarters, etc. I went through that case millions of times...