The Science Myth

What's a Sorgo?

Originally posted by Robtard
Is he an AC sock? The self back-patting, claims of not caring (while caring), insisting he's entertaining and false arrogance is very similar to 2007 AC.

I claimed to not care about specific things. I never said I was apathetic generally, otherwise I wouldn't be responding. Is there legitimacy to your pun-like username, or what?

I'm still waiting for your retort. I won't held my breath, lest I pass out and f*cking die.

I've responded to you several times. If you don't know who I'm socking by now, I'd doubt you could even put a cube block through a cube-shaped hole, at this point.

Originally posted by The Renegade
No, we won't. I don't argue anything of importance on KMC, particularly with most of the members here. I communicate with the members I fancy on other websites/software. I have had "meaningful" debates with people I don't know well/strangers but not here. This place is a disaster. I assert that it always has been.

I can be entertaining. It ends there. No, not because of "trolling." That's the hasty label that will be attached to this back-and-forth I've had with a few of you. It's to be expected, though.

I take this website and it's members as seriously as it does itself and myself. No, you do not have to like me. No one said or implied to did. You probably won't. I'm not a likable individual to most.

Pffft, you don't seem like someone who would have a meaningful debate. You are getting really boring real quick.

Originally posted by Robtard
What's a Sorgo?

Like AC but gayer.

Originally posted by BackFire

But I enjoy the misery my antics create.

Ditto! We share a lot.

Want to trade dungeon photos of eleven year olds?

Originally posted by BackFire
Like AC but gayer.

Flaming, dude. Like your ****ing Kings getting railed.

Originally posted by Dramatic Gecko
Pffft, you don't seem like someone who would have a meaningful debate. You are getting really boring real quick.

I'm not your entertainment center. You're mine.

I don't care what you think I seem like from a handful of posts regarding a debate about semantics, honestly.

Originally posted by BackFire
Like AC but gayer.

So he's a tracer is what you're saying. How unoriginal.

Eleven year olds? Shameful. Single digit age only, for me.

My Kings are just making it interesting. By losing horribly.

Originally posted by BackFire
He's Sorgo.

But I enjoy the misery my antics create.

This explains much.

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
This explains much.

Whatever it explains should already be common knowledge by now.

Like Sorgo's love for black men.

Originally posted by BackFire
Eleven year olds? Shameful. Single digit age only, for me.

My Kings are just making it interesting. By losing horribly.

I wanted a cross into hebephilia. I mean. can't you round a bit? Excessively, perhaps?

Yeah, about as interesting as the Bruins/Canucks finals in '11.

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
This explains much.

Do you wanna get smacked, Janus?

Originally posted by The Renegade

I don't care what you think I seem like from a handful of posts regarding a debate about semantics, honestly.

Point taken. Get more interesting sock. Entertain me.

Originally posted by The Renegade
Yeah, about as interesting as the Bruins/Canucks finals in '11.

So it's going seven games, is what you're saying?

Originally posted by BackFire
So it's going seven games, is what you're saying?

Yeah, mathematically. In spirit, it's basically a sweep.

Also, is there something wrong with loving black men?

Not "wrong". Just "disgusting".

Originally posted by The Renegade
I wanted a cross into hebephilia. I mean. can't you round a bit? Excessively, perhaps?

Yeah, about as interesting as the Bruins/Canucks finals in '11.

Do you wanna get smacked, Janus?

Nah. I am a self-fulfilling prophecy though:

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
Meanwhile, under the radar, BWR is bastardizing the burden of proof again.

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
Nah. I am a self-fulfilling prophecy though:

It in the guy's signature. How can you even cope with that? It's one thing to argue with those who accept that logic exists but don't understand it and it's another to deal with those that reject it entirely.

Originally posted by BackFire
Not "wrong". Just "disgusting".

A difference without a distinction, Gary Glitter.

I've had my fill of BWR for the time being, the lolz unfortunately died quickly.

Originally posted by The Renegade
A difference without a distinction, Gary Glitter.

I guess that makes sense for you, since you're an idiot who doesn't understand the meaning of words.

Originally posted by BackFire
I guess that makes sense for you, since you're an idiot.

^ You, Chris.

Originally posted by The Renegade
I claimed to not care about specific things. I never said I was apathetic generally, otherwise I wouldn't be responding.

Is there legitimacy to your pun-like username, or what?

I'm still waiting for your retort. I won't held my breath, lest I pass out and f*cking die.

I've responded to you several times. If you don't know who I'm socking by now, I'd doubt you could even put a cube block through a cube-shaped hole, at this point.

Make up your mind already.

You're the first poster to ever try and use my screen name as an insult. You get more originality points.

Nothing left to retort to. You were utterly confused at worse, or just being a pedantic ninny at best. <--- factual facts

You assume like I should automatically know who "Sorgo" was in here, when you were previously crying about having to make assumptions. Feel silly, feel silly now. Do you think you were important or something.

These are the facts: In your ignorance you bit off more than you could chew and you got mauled in return. Don't feel bad though, I'm known as "The Old Lion" around these parts, you're just a statistic. If anything take a positive out of it, you now know what a "qualifier" is; that's more than you knew yesterday.