Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare

Started by Smasandian5 pages

Yes it would.

I was trying to think what they could do. They already done:

1. WW2 in Europe
2. WW2 in Pacific
3. Cold War
4. Modern warfare
5. Future warfare

What's next? No idea.

Past warfare, obviously.

"Call of Duty: Trojan Ops". You know you want it.

I wouldn't mind them doing that sci-fi setting that got brought up.

Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare Trailer and Details Leaked
Footage from 2014's Call of Duty surfaces ahead of planned May 4 reveal.
http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/05/02/call-of-duty-advanced-warfare-trailer-and-details-leaked?utm_campaign=fbposts&utm_source=facebook

YouTube video

Someones been watching Elysium.

No.

Someone's been watching Titanfall.

Agreed. Kevin Spicey is boss though.

Yeah, he's a badass.

Not enough to get me interested in the game, though. It still looks like standard Call of Duty to me, perhaps with a little parkhour thrown into it. Plot looks dumb and generic.

idk. Frankly, I can't even think of what they could add to the game to make it fresh and worth buying. I'm just burnt out on shooters. Halo, CoD, Gears, etc.

All FPS's should take a nice, 5 year break or so after their third game.

Originally posted by Tzeentch
No.

Someone's been watching Titanfall.

Looks more Elysium to me with them suits.

No, you're right.

I was poking fun at the notion of them adding in wall-scaling and the like.

Knowing me I will probably still buy it for the SP.

I'm getting a Killzone vibe for some reason.

Meh. Couldn't be less interested. Just CoD trying to be Halo, Titanfall, Elysium, etc.

Kevin Spacey and the graphics look awesome, though.

Sledgehammer discusses a cancelled 3rd person Call of Duty title

http://www.playstationtrophies.org/news/news-13147-Sledgehammer-Discusses-Cancelled-Third-Person-Call-of-Duty-Title.html

wouldn't mind seeing that one be completed, Something different for the franchise.

3rd person would have made me snatch it up in a heartbeat.

YouTube video

Even though I know it's going to be another CoD but I do like the future type warfare. I can't think of a lot of frantic shooters that have that type of setting.

The graphics look really good and I like the gameplay. Wonder how all the additions and changes will workout in M, and if these changes will either make the franchise grow(is that even possible?) or piss off every single player.

Originally posted by BackFire
They actually changed quite a bit with Ghosts. They changed the way you level up, changed the way loadouts work, change the way you get new weapons. All of these changes didn't really work out very weoo. However, they also changed killstreaks and scaled them back, which was the one really good change they did in Ghosts. Unfortunately they also borked up the maps. There's a lot of bad maps in Ghosts. Many are too big and too open. You can go too long without encountering an enemy. Of course large maps like this also give way to annoying games where everyone is sniping. Most of the maps just don't flow as well as they did in Blops 2.

They really should stop with the annual releases. They won't - it's free money, but if they care about the longevity of the series they should. I think a bi-annual COD game would be good.

This post nicely sums up my thoughts, as well.

I really really really hate how wide open and large the maps are on Ghosts.

My son loved that single player, which is nice, I guess. I was shocked at the language, though...a bit rough for a 10 year old boy, imo.

I wonder if that was on purpose to compete with Battlefield.

I enjoy CoD single player. It's always a good 4-5 hours of fun. I always get Nov 11th off so I always get a day to run through the it.

http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/10/30/zombies-mode-leaked-in-call-of-duty-advanced-warfare

And just like that, I'm interested. This comes out next week, and it just managed to get onto my radar with this leak.

Zombies is back!