Originally posted by Emperordmbthat was before her "Prime" we never got to see her prime but of what we have seen. Her performance against Pre Visla was better than his performance against TPM maul and we already know that Pre Visla put up a good fight against TCW maul who is better than TPM Maul
I'm going with Kenobi on this one. His performance against Maul is better than her performance against Grievous.
Tano.
Kenobi's performance against Maul was simply him going on a rampage with no consideration of his own safety. It initially caught Maul off guard, but he quickly recovered and had Kenobi in a hole moments later. During the earlier stages of the fight remember how easily Maul constantly dismissed Kenobi while fighting off Jinn.
Originally posted by WildBantha88
that was before her "Prime" we never got to see her prime but of what we have seen. Her performance against Pre Visla was better than his performance against TPM maul and we already know that Pre Visla put up a good fight against TCW maul who is better than TPM Maul
Originally posted by NewGuy01
Tano.Kenobi's performance against Maul was simply him going on a rampage with no consideration of his own safety. It initially caught Maul off guard, but he quickly recovered and had Kenobi in a hole moments later. During the earlier stages of the fight remember how easily Maul constantly dismissed Kenobi while fighting off Jinn.
He kicked him in the head, what, three times?
Originally posted by Emperordmb1. I watched that fight and he did not seem to be fooling around. People just want to underrate Ahsoka, first with the Visla was drunk theory and now the Visla wasn't taking it seriously
Vizsla clearly was not trying nearly as hard against Ahsoka as he was against Maul first of all. Secondly, Maul would've taken out Vizsla in the first ten seconds of their fight had it been a pure contest of martial prowess.
2. As far as the lightsaber duel went, Visla was doing very well against Maul. He was clearly not as good but he wasn't a push over.
Originally posted by WildBantha88
1. I watched that fight and he did not seem to be fooling around. People just want to underrate Ahsoka, first with the Visla was drunk theory and now the Visla wasn't taking it seriously2. As far as the lightsaber duel went, Visla was doing very well against Maul. He was clearly not as good but he wasn't a push over.
2. Vizsla would've gotten taken out in ten seconds if he didn't have his jet pack. That being said, he still did better than Savage did, so props to him.
I always assumed that Maul could have killed Vizsla at any time, but chose to beat him "honorably" so that he could obtain the loyalty of Death Watch.
I would say that Ahsoka, at her age, surviving a 1-on-1 encounter with Grievous is pretty impressive (even though most of it was her hiding and running away).
I would also imagine she has more experience and is more battle hardened than TPM Kenobi.
A rage induced Kenobi managed to stand up to Maul for a little while.
A rage/Dark Side induced Tano managed to moderately annoy Anakin and Obi-Wan. Sure, she was no match for them, but they had difficulty incapacitating her.
Kenobi going toe-to-toe with Maul is very impressive, but I'm leaning towards Ahsoka.
Originally posted by red8she didn't even stand a chance against obi wan and anakin they where just blocking her moves
I always assumed that Maul could have killed Vizsla at any time, but chose to beat him "honorably" so that he could obtain the loyalty of Death Watch.I would say that Ahsoka, at her age, surviving a 1-on-1 encounter with Grievous is pretty impressive (even though most of it was her hiding and running away).
I would also imagine she has more experience and is more battle hardened than TPM Kenobi.
A rage induced Kenobi managed to stand up to Maul for a little while.
A rage/Dark Side induced Tano managed to moderately annoy Anakin and Obi-Wan. Sure, she was no match for them, but they had difficulty incapacitating her.Kenobi going toe-to-toe with Maul is very impressive, but I'm leaning towards Ahsoka.