Nucleotide sequencing; combinatorics and optimization in designing genius prodigies
Who's to say this isn't already happening?
How would the few who're in control of the markets benefit from the world knowing about our ability to make designed people as opposed to randomly born people?
The rich need to be smarter than the poor to stay that way, if my children are smarter than your children my children can provide for me a better retirement home than yours.
Originally posted by Oneness
Who's to say this isn't already happening?
Me. Where's your evidence?
Originally posted by Oneness
How would the few who're in control of the markets benefit from the world knowing about our ability to make designed people as opposed to randomly born people?
How would even 1% of the population hide this from everyone else?
Originally posted by Oneness
The rich need to be smarter than the poor to stay that way, if my children are smarter than your children my children can provide for me a better retirement home than yours.
Not smarter, just richer. Intelligence isn't a direct link to wealth. After a certain point there's actually an inverse relationship between the two. The #1 factor in predicting your wealth is your parent's wealth. You don't need to be smart (though it helps), you just have to have a good start.
...
This belongs in the conspiracy forum imo. Usually there's at least one shady link providing a back story. Until there's something more concrete, this is just paranoid speculation.
Impressive title at least. 👆
Nature Vs. Nurture.
Your say there's a drop in productivity when needs are fulfilled. That is a perfectly reasonable and, for the most part, accurate summation. However, if you design certain traits, certain qualities - success builds confidence and when one is self-centered and driven only by obsession - there becomes an exponential need to accumulate more wealth in which the parents can feed on like nice fat ticks while the rest of the world literally has to empty their pockets to feed this fat tick.
Originally posted by Epicurus
^In his head. There's also a bunch of other stuff in his head, most of which would be enough to qualify him for a lifetime in a psych ward.
Sure. I'm not trying to engage him on every point, just drive home the central idea that opinions need evidential justification to be taken seriously.
Re: Nucleotide sequencing; combinatorics and optimization in designing genius prodigies
Originally posted by Oneness
Who's to say this isn't already happening?How would the few who're in control of the markets benefit from the world knowing about our ability to make designed people as opposed to randomly born people?
The rich need to be smarter than the poor to stay that way, if my children are smarter than your children my children can provide for me a better retirement home than yours.
No. We are nowhere even close to being able to do this.
I'm not paranoid, I've merely embraced the fact that money is the central driving force for a Dystopia; a gap and pleasure, wealth, and physical health between the rich and the poor that makes the social caste of Ancient Egypt seem euphoric.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
No. We are nowhere even close to being able to do this.
Perhaps funding was cut off so an MK-ultra esque, privately funded group could research it with compensation liken to the collective wealth of the Rothchilds.
If you were being paid billions of dollars every 5 years among hundreds other eminent scientists to diligently sequence nucleotides, would you ask why?
And how long do you think it would take before they've found a combination that makes Einstein, Brad Pitt and Usain Bolt put together?
I couldn't say for sure - but given the resources, time-spent, and organization, that's something you only saw during the manufacturing of war-machines during WWII and the multi-staged nuclear stockpile created during the Cold War with Russia.
After 40 years you'd think these private researchers constantly being pulled in fresh out of their PhDs would be so far ahead of the scientific community at this point in time. 4 decades to be precise.
This is obsolete knowledge. Next it was radical stem-cell based DnA alteration to get a better result through genetic modification in life than a preconceived life predisposed to be superior but unaltered, at least in the nature aspect, throughout nurture/life. The advantage of genetic manipulation includes shape-shifting into the perfect form and preventing senescence, the magic of the stem-cells of children in the womb. When this happens one day, it will be covered up and the rest of the scientific community will not be founded to make the same discovery and share it publicly.
Now we'd be more into mind-uploading.
But the king of all human-enhancement is finding a way to make synthetic neurons fire off as slowly as real neurons to replace every nerve and neuron in the networks with the human brain and nervous system. Uploading a consciousness merely creates a new nigh-immortal life-form with the consciousness of the man it's based on. That man is still subject to death and disease, unlike if you replaced all of his cells with synthetic counterparts. The product of this will be far more capable than merely an uploaded mind, it would be physically superior as well as linked into the grid and all information and knowledge humanity holds.