Originally posted by RobtardI am saying the baby had protective magic against Voldemort. The Orc didn't have any protective magic against Gandalf protecting them. Ignoring the context of the feat is trolling. Context. It matters, dummy.
Quanchi thinks infant Harry Potter > LoTR Orcs. That sir, is a fanboi.
Originally posted by RobtardVoldemort defeated Harry later. Harry did nothing though his mother did. Context.
Context: Voldermort is a dumbass who didn't do his homework against Harry Potter, not once, but twice; why baby Harry kicked his ass and then teen Harry kicked his ass years later.Keep ignoring context though.
Orcs making Gandalf hide up trees or flee isn't impressive. They didn't have magic protecting them either.
What did I ignore ?
Originally posted by Lestov16The a Hogwarts shield sure was.
When did he do this? Dumbledore's shields weren't as powerful as the ones Gandalf used against Sauron, and Vold needed the Elder Wand to break the Hogwarts shield.
The elder wand resisted him so he did it despite the wand resisting him making the feat more impressive. It cracked as a result.
Context.
😂
Originally posted by RobtardIt kept hundreds of wizards at bay and disintegrated those who ran into it.
The Hogwarts shield keep wizards at bay. Gandalf's shield resisted the Balrog and Sauron for a time. /screenfeatsergo It's going to take Voldermort a very long time to get through Gandalf's shield and he'll be TK'd to death before that.
Gandalf wins again via screen feats. /thread
No, it won't since his feat is a lot more impressive than Sauron's against a weaker Gandalf.
Gandalf loses via screen feats. Saruman beat his ass with tk.
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=p1Vyhve9gtg
Saruman beat him very quickly. He didn't have his shields there now did he ?
😂