Originally posted by Tzeentch
Why is sexual wish-fullmilment for adolescent cent viewers inherently distasteful, Bardock-sempai?
I don't think it's inherently distasteful, but in light of the media landscape we have to live with and particularly at the expense of the character in question I find it distasteful.
Originally posted by Robtard
Well, no. They flipped it with the female being the one. But okay.
If I recall correctly he asked for a kiss in return for letting her out. Which is already pretty messed up, reducing her to a sex object. Obviously the princess in this case is not a person in distress for being held hostage for weeks, she's just a sexual reward for the main character. I understand that what you said is the intention, I just don't think it's empowering, it's more the opposite, same old sexism, and I found it distasteful, as stated previously.
Originally posted by Bardock42She is a sex object, you vagina fart.
I don't think it's inherently distasteful, but in light of the media landscape we have to live with and particularly at the expense of the character in question I find it distasteful.If I recall correctly he asked for a kiss in return for letting her out. Which is already pretty messed up, reducing her to a sex object. Obviously the princess in this case is not a person in distress for being held hostage for weeks, she's just a sexual reward for the main character. I understand that what you said is the intention, I just don't think it's empowering, it's more the opposite, same old sexism, and I found it distasteful, as stated previously.
Well, she was pretty cool standing up to Samuel L. Jackson, so something more in that vein, she could have aided Eggsy in some way. Or just being rescued without the line.
Really just been one of the NPC characters that Eggsy doesn't **** as a reward for winning....because that's just so overdone.
The movie is very good in portraying female characters generally though, I think. And the platonic friendship between Eggsy and Roxy is great and refreshing.