Gandalf vs. Magneto

Started by quanchi1129 pages

Originally posted by Robtard
You claimed what Gandalf did to all those Goblins and wooden structure was little more than a "violent push".

YouTube video

You know nothing, go back under your bed.

Yes, as it had the same affect of just the force behind it. No real damage by itself just knocked off their feet. You said it killed by force alone.

Go sit down when your wife allows you to.

Originally posted by The_Tempest
To be fair, Magneto's power does rely on the environment. So an environment without metal or limited metal doesn't really constitute a neutral one.

Agreed

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, as it had the same affect of just the force behind it. No real damage by itself just knocked off their feet. You said it killed by force alone.

Go sit down when your wife allows you to.

😂 Keep downplaying, 'just a violent push':

YouTube video

Seriously, get back under your bed, you're terrible at this with your downplaying tactics.

Originally posted by The_Tempest
To be fair, Magneto's power does rely on the environment. So an environment without metal or limited metal doesn't really constitute a neutral one.
Rob is biased so he will do anything to be biased.

Originally posted by Robtard
Did you notice that the arena wasn't set previously.

You just assumed it would be in an environment that heavily favors Magneto instead of a neutral one, cos you're a silly ponce.

So now that the environment has been set, Gandalf loses right?

Originally posted by Robtard
😂 Keep downplaying, 'just a violent push':

YouTube video

Seriously, get back under your bed, you're terrible at this with your downplaying tactics.

It is. No one was killed. That was your claim. Who has tk killed by force alone ?

Why would I sit down after you embarrassed yourself ?

YouTube video

/thread

Rob will run soon again.

I don't think Mags' vastly greater feats (in terms of scale) necessarily land him the win either, though.

Consider Quicksilver vs. Magneto. Magneto is undoubtedly the more powerful mutant in terms of scope and scale and ability to render destruction. The only mutants demonstrably stronger in the cinematic X-Men universe are the Phoenix and Shaw. But Quicksilver is inarguably the more effective combatant despite his inexperience and lack of lethal intent because he could defeat Magneto before Magneto could land a blow.

You can't always go with raw power.

Originally posted by The_Tempest
I don't think Mags' vastly greater feats (in terms of scale) necessarily land him the win either, though.

Consider Quicksilver vs. Magneto. Magneto is undoubtedly the more powerful mutant in terms of scope and scale and ability to render destruction. The only mutants demonstrably stronger in the cinematic X-Men universe are the Phoenix and Shaw. But Quicksilver is inarguably the more effective combatant despite his inexperience and lack of lethal intent because he could defeat Magneto before Magneto could land a blow.

You can't always go with raw power.

I agree but he is more ruthless, as well as more formidable than Gandalf by far. He has power, ruthlessness, greater feats, and a greater average portrayal than Gandalf who usually runs from orcs.

Originally posted by The_Tempest
I don't think Mags' vastly greater feats (in terms of scale) necessarily land him the win either, though.

Consider Quicksilver vs. Magneto. Magneto is undoubtedly the more powerful mutant in terms of scope and scale and ability to render destruction. The only mutants demonstrably stronger in the cinematic X-Men universe are the Phoenix and Shaw. But Quicksilver is inarguably the more effective combatant despite his inexperience and lack of lethal intent because he could defeat Magneto before Magneto could land a blow.

You can't always go with raw power.

QS vs Magento, Mags would lose. Its a no contest. He was a statue just like everyone else in the room.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
So now that the environment has been set, Gandalf loses right?

Depends, it seems to favor Magneto heavily, being in a junkyard.

But if Gandalf gets first attack (which is likely), that could mean the end for Magneto, getting slammed back and sent flying into a pile of scrap might well kill a 70ish year old man, if not it should incapacitate him.

Originally posted by Robtard
Depends, it seems to favor Magneto heavily, being in a junkyard.

But if Gandalf gets first attack (which is likely), that could mean the end for Magneto, getting slammed back and sent flying into a pile of scrap might well kill a 70ish year old man. if not incapacitate him.

So before when the environment favored Gandalf, you claimed victory, now its equal playing field and you cry about it?

He can fly, has helmet and can manipulate magnetic fields. You already stated Mag was more powerful in you're previous posts.

Originally posted by Robtard
Depends, it seems to favor Magneto heavily, being in a junkyard.

But if Gandalf gets first attack (which is likely), that could mean the end for Magneto, getting slammed back and sent flying into a pile of scrap might well kill a 70ish year old man, if not it should incapacitate him.

Why is Gandalf getting the first attack in likely ?

Originally posted by Time Immemorial

So before when the environment favored Gandalf, you claimed victory, now its equal playing field and you cry about it?

He can fly, has helmet and can manipulate magnetic fields. You already stated Mag was more powerful in you're previous posts.

When did the environment ever favor Gandalf here?

Mags does have more raw power than Gandalf, that doesn't mean an automatic win though, especially when either can one-shot each other.

Originally posted by Robtard
Mags does have more raw power than Gandalf, that doesn't mean an automatic win though, especially when either can one-shot each other.
Who has Gandalf oneshotted ?

Originally posted by Robtard
Mags does have more raw power than Gandalf, that doesn't mean an automatic win though, especially when either can one-shot each other.

Gandalf was not even able to one shot Saruman? Why can he now one shot Mag?

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Gandalf was not even able to one shot Saruman? Why can he now one shot Mag?
Exactly. Evidence contradicts his silly made up claims.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Gandalf was not even able to one shot Saruman? Why can he now one shot Mag?

Here you go, guess you missed it the first 2 times. See those Goblins flying, now imagine that was a 70ish year old man's body and he's flying in a junk yard.

YouTube video

Originally posted by Robtard
Here you go, guess you missed it the first 2 times. See those Goblins flying, now imagine that was a 70ish year old man's body and he's flying in a junk yard.

YouTube video

We see his attacks against an older man. I posted the video. Quit speculating when we evidence of him going up against an older man already.