Gregor Clegane vs Movie Villains

Started by NemeBro6 pages

Originally posted by quanchi112
Explain how this applies to a fictional matchup in this thread. More importantly explain what you believe he will do in character in the versus threads and support it.

Can't wait to tear you apart.

I suppose this would happen:

Originally posted by quanchi112
You are ignoring the circumstances of what actually took place and falsely applying the same set of circumstances to all fights.

Again, I don't have to break down the character for you but in this case I will to quench your obsession for the time being. His arrogance, his sense of personal belief in himself, his sense of purpose, and determination.

He doesn't just talk the talk like so many of you on here. I say I'm going yo do something I do it. You like most coward ***** from the sidelines while you never achieve your goals or follow through with anything. I am who I am both inside this board and outside. My sense of purpose and who I am is undeniable whereas you are like the masses. You do what every else does regardless of if you enjoy it or not. I bet at this point you don't even know anymore.

Strawman, so ignoring.

Copying basically what I said, since you failed to grasp the basics of what makes up Oberyn's character and people laughed at you. Not clever. Not clever at all.

And a vapid rant about yourself. You're having another tough day it seems.

Originally posted by Robtard
Strawman, so ignoring.

Copying basically what I said, since you failed to grasp the basics of what makes up Oberyn's character. Not clever.

And a vapid rant about yourself. You're having another tough day it seems.

You shouldn't say ignoring you should say not understanding because clearly you don't.

No, you're like the others. Just sit on the sidelines and say he should have done this or that without ever doing anything for yourself. What a horrible role model you are. I hope they don't seek to emulate you.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You shouldn't say ignoring you should say not understanding because clearly you don't.

No, you're like the others. Just sit on the sidelines and say he should have done this or that without ever doing anything for yourself. What a horrible role model you are. I hope they don't seek to emulate you.

Grammar-rage at maximum. You are having a very rough day today.

ps Maybe just copy me verbatim next time?

Originally posted by Robtard
Grammar-rage at maximum. You are having a very rough day today.

ps Maybe just copy me verbatim next time?

You are the one who can't grasp anything but that wouldn't indicate a rough day just an average day for yourself.

Ps. Nice job conceding you're a an terrible role model and coward.

Haha.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You are the one who can't grasp anything but that wouldn't indicate a rough day just an average day for yourself.

Ps. Nice job conceding you're a an terrible role model and coward.

Haha.

"a an", just awful. Grammar-rage overload it seems.

But do let me know if you need any more insights into Oberyn's character, since you missed them all. He's actually a decent character beyond the exterior aspects you focused on.

Originally posted by NemeBro
I suppose this would happen:

not quite the same w/o that orgasmic screaming.

Stops at 3

Originally posted by Robtard
"a an", just awful. Grammar-rage overload it seems.

But do let me know if you need any more insights into Oberyn's character, since you missed them all. He's actually a decent character beyond the exterior aspects you focused on.

The same old girlish responses about grammar. You don't have anything between your legs. Your wife took it a long time ago.

You asked what I liked about him. I said so. I not doing a paper on all of his characteristics to appease your obsession with characters I like. Get a life and grow a pair. You cry like a woman all the time.

Originally posted by Robtard
This is probably true, great character; would make a poor MVF combatant for stated reasons. He'd get an opponent down and then Munson it all away.

Nah.

CIS is off, by default, in vs. threads. Only if the OP specifies the combatants fight in character would that apply to a vs. thread.

Even in character he doesn't toy with his victims in this manner. He wanted to get a confession and said he would end it as soon as he did. Since there is no plot or audience for him to entertain he doesn't toy with his victim. One can't apply the situational circumstances from this fight to a one on one versus thread fight. That is silly.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Nah.

CIS is off, by default, in vs. threads. Only if the OP specifies the combatants fight in character would that apply to a vs. thread.

Did you at least get the "Munson" reference. All that really matters.

Where does it state that CIS is off by default in vs threads...because according to this, CIS is on.

Character Induced Stupidity, or CIS, on the other hand, refers to any natural mental limitations that characters impose upon themselves and reduce their ability to use their own skills and powers effectively. Unlike PIS, CIS does not occur because the plot requires it, but because the character is genuinely that dumb. Examples of the CIS-afflicted include characters such as Rhino or Jar Jar Binks. Events of CIS are not exempt from debates.
Originally posted by Silent Master
"Character Induced Stupidity, or CIS, on the other hand, refers to any natural mental limitations that characters impose upon themselves and reduce their ability to use their own skills and powers effectively. Unlike PIS, CIS does not occur because the plot requires it, but because the character is genuinely that dumb. Examples of the CIS-afflicted include characters such as Rhino or Jar Jar Binks. Events of CIS are not exempt from debates.

...and thats that.

cry more quan-she.

Originally posted by Robtard
Did you at least get the "Munson" reference. All that really matters.
Your kingpin joke aside I have already thoroughly decimated your horrible logic in a versus matchup. Go ask the brains in the family, your wife.

wait...so are you asserting that CIS is turned off in this forum? did someone inform impediment? someone probably should, to avoid further confusion. we wouldnt want imp making any decisions which go over quan's head.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
wait...so are you asserting that CIS is turned off in this forum? did someone inform impediment? someone probably should, to avoid further confusion. we wouldnt want imp making any decisions which go over quan's head.
Use a cap every once in a while you heathen. I'm not a stickler for grammar but to see your childish, gibberish time after time can be annoying. I argue in character and based off logic and reasoning. You use self serving logic from thread to thread. I remain consistent while you wouldn't know consistency if it bit you in your bloated face.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Use a cap every once in a while you heathen. I'm not a stickler for grammar but to see your childish, gibberish time after time can be annoying. I argue in character and based off logic and reasoning. You use self serving logic from thread to thread. I remain consistent while you wouldn't know consistency if it bit you in your bloated face.

so basically established forum rules are forfeit so that you may continue with this particular campain of attention whoring?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Your kingpin joke aside

I have already thoroughly decimated your horrible logic in a versus matchup.

Go ask the brains in the family, your wife.

So you can google.

Strawman tactics again.

"You have a smart wife!", what a horrible burn, clown.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
so basically established forum rules are forfeit so that you may continue with this particular campain of attention whoring?
Oh go cry somewhere else. I have always been up front and consistent with how I argue. You're always so visibly shaken by the things I do.