Avengers: Age of Ultron vs Batman vs Superman: Dawn of Justice

Started by steverules_23 pagesPoll

Which movie will do better?

Avengers: Age of Ultron vs Batman vs Superman: Dawn of Justic

Avengers 2 has a release date of May 2015 whilst Batman v Superman has a release date of May 2016 which'll be year later obviously. So my question is, which movie do you think will do better? I know Batman v Superman isn't the JLA movie...but it kinda is. I know we're still quite a while a way from both movies but there's no harm in getting the ball rolling a little early and this thread was bound to pop up at some point.

I think Avengers will do better.
Might be close, though. Avengers is the one i'm looking forward to most, personally.

Quality-Wise Avengers 2 should be better. Whedon said part one wasn't anything spectacular and plans to do a much better job on the second. If whedon considers The Avengers unspectacular, I can't imagine how ****ing amazing part two is gonna be. Also, Bats v Supes doesn't inspire much confidence.

Box Office wise idk. Everyone will have to watch Batman vs Superman, while the Avengers hype would have died down. Avengers box office should have longer legs if it's better quality though, and I think it will be.

Avengers 2 will definitely make more moolah WW.

The real question of which will make more is SW7 vs A: AoU.

Originally posted by ares834
Avengers 2 will definitely make more moolah WW.

The real question of which will make more is SW7 vs A: AoU.

Oh, Avengers will make way more than Star Wars. After those shitty prequels, Star Wars hype is at a low

Not to mention the retconning of the EU

Only the smallest fraction of fans cared about the EU. Plus they are die hards and are pretty much guaranteed to see the new films anyway.

Originally posted by Firefly218
Oh, Avengers will make way more than Star Wars. After those shitty prequels, Star Wars hype is at a low

You are seriously underestimating the power of nostalgia and the OT cast returning. These movies aren't sequels to the PT but are direct sequels to the OT. They will pull in a ton of money.

Avengers will most likely make more money.

I just hope that SvB is good, and makes enough money to make them commit to more movies.

Originally posted by ares834
Avengers 2 will definitely make more moolah WW.

The real question of which will make more is SW7 vs A: AoU.

Funniest part is Disney owns both Star Wars and Avengers so they will be laughing their asses off to the bank.

Avengers by a light year.

Age of Ultron will be leagues better..

Avengers has the advantage right now.

SvsB has potential I hope the do not **** it up.

I'm glad I live in a world where I can see both and be happy about life.

Originally posted by Lestov16
Not to mention the retconning of the EU

I understand that they said its no longer cannon but the way I look at it is that its just a separate...and better universe lol

I think Avengers will make a lot more then Dawn of Justice. Granted im sure there will be a good bit of people that see both but unless Dawn of Justice is spectacular and merits everyone going to see it more then once it wont even be close imo.

Originally posted by Firefly218
Oh, Avengers will make way more than Star Wars. After those shitty prequels, Star Wars hype is at a low

Star Wars hype is NOT at an all time low. What planet ate you living on where no one gives a crap about the announcement of Episode VII? The real Question is if JJ Abrams has what it takes to make a movie that should easily make A Billion Plus World Wide.

Originally posted by Impediment
Avengers by a light year.

And a Kessel run!

Originally posted by DARTH POWER
Star Wars hype is NOT at an all time low. What planet ate you living on where no one gives a crap about the announcement of Episode VII? The real Question is if JJ Abrams has what it takes to make a movie that should easily make A Billion Plus World Wide.

I never said Star Wars hype is at an all time low . I said Star Wars hype is at a low - which just means that it's relatively weak. Still massive, but not at its epitome, or not teaching its potential. Lots of people were put off by the horrid prequels. Learn to read bro. Those stress wrinkles must be distorting your vision.

Originally posted by Firefly218
I never said Star Wars hype is at an [B]all time low . I said Star Wars hype is at a low - which just means that it's relatively weak. Still massive, but not at its epitome, or not teaching its potential. [/B]

I don't care if you're claiming it's at an all time low, or just very low.

You never implied at all that it was still massive. Don't try and make out you were saying something completely different now that you're being called out on what you said.

Originally posted by Firefly218
Lots of people were put off by the horrid prequels.

Strange because I don't remember the first 2 "horrid prequels" stopping Revenge of the Sith earning money, but suddenly the new film following what's generally considered the best of the prequels, and a film which is bringing back the OT Cast, has suddenly got really low hype due to the Prequels? Sure.

But I'm not surprised since it is quite a rare occurrence for you to actually make sense.

Originally posted by Firefly218
Learn to read bro. Those stress wrinkles must be distorting your vision.

Learn to think about what you're writing before you write it. Oh and.. Just learn anything at all useful.

I never said Star Wars hype was very low, I said it was at a low. The hype is still very high, but relative to other huge blockbusters, especially Avengers 2 and bats vs supes, it's weaker. Makes sense now?

Also, the first two horrible prequels put a sizable damper on the box office of Revenge of Sith. RoS earned a meager 380 million worldwide. Those numbers can't compete with a box office Mammoth like Avengers or the first on-screen pairing of bats, supes and WW.